B24 MED - Legal Framework PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by AthleticSilver740
NUS Faculty of Law
Tags
Related
Summary
This document covers the legal framework related to mediation. It discusses legal sources, the basis of mediation, the Mediation Act 2017, and conduct of lawyers. Various cases and practice directions are also mentioned.
Full Transcript
Lecture 3 - legal framework - A. Legal Sources - B. Basis of Mediation - ❖ By Agreement - ❖ By Statutes or Subsidiary Legislation - ❖ By Court's / Authorised Body's Directions - **[ Rules of Court (O. 5, r. 3)]** - Personal Data Protection Act 2012, s 48G - Where a...
Lecture 3 - legal framework - A. Legal Sources - B. Basis of Mediation - ❖ By Agreement - ❖ By Statutes or Subsidiary Legislation - ❖ By Court's / Authorised Body's Directions - **[ Rules of Court (O. 5, r. 3)]** - Personal Data Protection Act 2012, s 48G - Where a Party declines ADR - C. Mediation Act 2017 - s3 Mediation Act - What is mediation - s6 Mediation Act applicability of the Mediation Act - s8 Mediation Act - Stay of proceedings - s9 Mediation Act - Confidentiality - s10 Mediation Act - Without Prejudice privilege - Mariwu Industrial Co (S) Pte Ltd v Dextra Asia Co Ltd \[2006\] 4 SLR(R) 807 at \[24\] - Greenline-Onyx Envirotech Phils, Inc v Otto Systems Singapore Pte Ltd \[2007\] 3 SLR(R) 40 - Mediated Settlement Agreement - checklist - Subject to contract doctrines - s12 Mediation Act - Mediation Agreement recorded as consent order - s12(3) and (4) Mediation Act - s2 Mediation Act - **[Requirements]** of the Mediated Settlement Agreement - Mediated settlement Agreement in **[Family law]** - s12 (5) Mediation Act - **[Enforcement]** of Settlement Agreement - D. Conduct of Lawyers - PD 53 - Duty to advise on ADR and associated cost orders - Lock Han Chng Jonathan (Jonathan Luo Hancheng) v Goh Jessiline \[2007\] SGCA 56 - Maxx Engineering v PQ Builders Pte Ltd \[2023\] SGHC 71 - **[Court cannot force parties to mediate]** - E. Conduct of Parties and Costs Consequences - Rules of Court 2021, O. 5, r. 1 and r. 2 - **[The mindset now is before you start litigation, think about settling.]** - Rules of Court 2021, O. 21, r. 2(2)(a) - **[face costs consequences for rejecting mediation]** - Supreme Court Practice **[Directions 53]** and **[Appendix D]** - State Courts Practice **[Directions 34]** - The **[Test]** of whether a party has unreasonably refused ADR - Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil \[2023\] EWCA Civ 1416 - **[Stay of proceedings in favour of mediation]** - Nigel Witham Ltd v Smith and another \[2008\] EWHC 12 (TCC), at \[32\] "\[32\] - **[identify the happy medium]** - PGF II SA v OMFS Co 1 Ltd \[2014\] 1 WLR 1386 at \[34\] - **[silence towards ADR is unreasonable]** - Legis Point LLC v Tay Choon Ai \[2018\] 3 SLR 1269 - **[cost of mediation work is considered in party-to-party cost]**