Competitive Strategy: Analyzing Industries and Competitors PDF

Document Details

FoolproofColosseum2766

Uploaded by FoolproofColosseum2766

Harvard Business School

Michael Porter

Tags

competitive strategy industry analysis business strategy management

Summary

This document summarizes Michael Porter's *Competitive Strategy*, a seminal work in strategic management. The book provides a framework for analyzing industries and competitors, outlining enduring fundamentals and the five forces model to understand competition. The document emphasizes the enduring importance of industry structure in explaining profitability, the choices between low cost and differentiation, and the need for consistent strategic positioning.

Full Transcript

**Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors: A Detailed Summary** **Introduction (1998)** Michael Porter\'s *Competitive Strategy* revolutionized the field of strategic management by providing a systematic and rigorous framework for analyzing industries and competit...

**Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors: A Detailed Summary** **Introduction (1998)** Michael Porter\'s *Competitive Strategy* revolutionized the field of strategic management by providing a systematic and rigorous framework for analyzing industries and competitors. Eighteen years after its initial publication, the book\'s relevance remains undiminished, serving as a bedrock for understanding competition in an increasingly dynamic business environment. **The Enduring Fundamentals:** - **Competition\'s Significance:** The book emphasizes that competition, which was already intensifying globally in 1980, continues to be a defining characteristic of the modern business landscape. - **Addressing a Void:** *Competitive Strategy* provided crucial tools for managers tasked with strategic planning. Its frameworks helped dissect industries, assess rivals, and define unique competitive positions for businesses. - **New Direction for Economics:** Porter\'s work moved economic thinking beyond stylized models by acknowledging the heterogeneity of industries and the agency of managers in influencing competitive outcomes. Concepts like market signaling, switching costs, and barriers to entry became fertile avenues for further research. **What Has Changed, What Hasn\'t:** - **Unending Change:** Technological advancements, new management tools, and evolving government policies have continuously reshaped the business environment. Yet, the foundational principles of competition remain unchanged. - **Five Forces Framework\'s Enduring Power:** The five forces model transcends specific industry contexts, remaining relevant for analyzing diverse industries from high-tech to service sectors. It highlights the sources of value creation and division among industry players. - **Competitive Advantage:** The pursuit of superior profitability still hinges on achieving relative cost advantage or differentiation. While new practices like faster cycle times and total quality are important, their impact ultimately boils down to how they influence the five forces, a firm\'s relative costs, and its differentiation capabilities. **Enduring Debates and Porter\'s Responses:** - **Industry\'s Importance:** Counterarguments suggest that industry structure is inconsequential due to rapid changes. Porter maintains that both industry and individual firm position are essential, backed by empirical evidence demonstrating the significance of industry in explaining profitability and stock market performance. - **Stuck in the Middle:** Some critique the strict choice between low cost and differentiation. Porter clarifies that while absolute lowest cost and maximized differentiation are rarely compatible, companies should not neglect one dimension entirely in pursuit of the other. He emphasizes the pursuit of *operational effectiveness* without sacrificing strategic positioning. - **Flexibility vs. Strategy:** Arguments for prioritizing flexibility over defined strategies are countered by Porter\'s emphasis on the need for consistent strategic positions to achieve competitive advantage. Flexibility in strategic terms, he argues, makes it nearly impossible to excel in any particular strategy. **Part I: General Analytical Techniques** **Chapter 1: The Structural Analysis of Industries** Porter introduces the *Five Forces Framework* as the core of industry analysis. These forces collectively determine the intensity of competition and ultimately, the profitability potential of an industry. **The Five Forces:** 1. **Threat of Entry:** New entrants bring fresh capacity and the desire for market share. Six major barriers to entry are identified: - Economies of Scale - Product Differentiation - Capital Requirements - Switching Costs - Access to Distribution Channels - Cost Disadvantages Independent of Scale (proprietary technology, favorable raw material access, etc.) 2. **Intensity of Rivalry Among Existing Competitors:** Rivalry takes many forms, including price wars, advertising battles, and new product introductions. The likelihood of intense rivalry is greater when: - Competitors are numerous and/or equally balanced - Industry growth is slow - Fixed or storage costs are high - Differentiation or switching costs are low - Capacity additions occur in large increments - Competitors are diverse - Strategic stakes are high - Exit barriers are high 3. **Pressure from Substitute Products:** Substitutes limit industry profitability by setting a ceiling on prices. Substitute analysis requires identifying products that perform the same function as the industry\'s products, even in seemingly unrelated businesses. 4. **Bargaining Power of Buyers:** Buyers can force down prices, demand higher quality, and play competitors against each other. Buyer power is enhanced when: - Buyers are concentrated or purchase large volumes - Purchased products represent a significant fraction of buyers\' costs - Products are standardized or undifferentiated - Buyers face few switching costs - Buyers earn low profits - Buyers pose a credible threat of backward integration 5. **Bargaining Power of Suppliers:** Suppliers can exert power by raising prices or reducing quality. Conditions mirroring those for strong buyer power lead to strong supplier power. Labor is also a supplier and its power is influenced by organization (e.g., unionization) and skill scarcity. **Government\'s Influence:** Government policies impact all five forces, primarily by affecting entry barriers, but also by shaping industry growth, cost structures, and substitute positions. **Structural Analysis and Competitive Strategy:** - **Positioning:** A firm can choose a position where its capabilities provide the best defense against the existing competitive forces. - **Influencing the Balance:** Strategic moves can be made to alter the causes of the forces and improve a firm\'s relative position. - **Exploiting Change:** Industry evolution brings changes in structural conditions, creating opportunities for firms to adapt to the new competitive landscape before rivals recognize it. **Industry Definition and Strategy:** - While identifying the relevant industry is crucial, the book argues that the key to successful strategy is recognizing the broad sources of competition. Focusing on extended rivalry lessens the need for overly specific industry boundaries. - Industry definition differs from defining a firm\'s business. While an industry may be defined broadly, a firm may choose to compete in a narrower segment or even a group of related industries. **Chapter 2: Generic Competitive Strategies** Porter outlines three broad, internally consistent strategies for achieving a defendable position and outperforming competitors in the long run: **1. Overall Cost Leadership:** - Achieving the lowest cost position in an industry through functional policies focused on cost minimization. - Requires efficient-scale facilities, aggressive cost reductions from experience, tight cost control, avoidance of marginal customers, and minimized costs in R&D, service, sales, and advertising. - Provides defense against all five forces as competition erodes profits of less efficient firms first. - Often necessitates high market share, up-front capital investment, aggressive pricing, and acceptance of initial losses to build volume. **2. Differentiation:** - Creating a product or service perceived industry-wide as unique. - Achieved through design, brand image, technology, features, customer service, dealer network, or other dimensions. - Provides insulation from rivalry due to brand loyalty, creates entry barriers, mitigates buyer power, and places the firm in a favorable position against substitutes. - May require trade-offs with cost position if differentiation-creating activities are inherently costly. **3. Focus:** - Concentrating on a particular buyer group, product segment, or geographic market. - Achieves either differentiation from better meeting target needs, lower costs in serving the target, or both. - Provides defenses against the five forces within the narrow target market. - Necessitates a trade-off between profitability and sales volume as focus limits overall market share. **Stuck in the Middle:** - Firms failing to commit to any of the three generic strategies are \"stuck in the middle\" -- lacking the market share, cost position, or focus to compete effectively. - Leads to low profitability as the firm loses high-volume, low-price customers to cost leaders and high-margin customers to differentiated or focused firms. **Risks of the Generic Strategies:** - **Cost Leadership Risks:** Technological changes that nullify past investments, low-cost learning by newcomers, inability to see needed product or marketing changes, and cost inflation eroding price differentials. - **Differentiation Risks:** Cost differentials becoming too large, buyers\' need for differentiation falling, and imitation narrowing perceived differentiation. - **Focus Risks:** Cost differentials widening, narrowing differences between the target and the broader market, and competitors out-focusing the firm. **Chapter 3: A Framework for Competitor Analysis** Porter stresses the importance of understanding competitors beyond simply knowing their current strategies and capabilities. The framework for competitor analysis includes four components: **1. Future Goals:** - Understanding what is driving the competitor\'s behavior allows for predictions about its future actions, satisfaction with its current position, and reaction to external events or moves by other firms. - This involves analyzing stated and unstated goals, attitude toward risk, organizational values, and cultural factors. **2. Assumptions:** - Identifying a competitor\'s beliefs about itself and the industry reveals biases or blind spots that can be exploited strategically. - Analyzing past successes and failures, historical and emotional attachments, and perceptions of future demand and trends can uncover these assumptions. **3. Current Strategy:** - Articulating the competitor\'s key operating policies in each functional area and its approach to interrelating functions. - This may be explicit through formal planning documents or implicit through observing actual actions. **4. Capabilities:** - Assessing the competitor\'s strengths and weaknesses in each functional area and overall. - This involves analyzing its relative cost position, product quality, R&D capabilities, financial strength, organizational effectiveness, and ability to adapt to change and respond quickly. **Competitor Response Profile:** - Combining the four components helps predict the competitor\'s likely responses to various scenarios. - This includes anticipating offensive moves the competitor might initiate, assessing its defensive capabilities against various moves or events, and identifying its \"hot buttons\" or areas where it will respond aggressively. **Picking the Battleground:** - Strategic moves should be chosen where the firm has a distinctive advantage and competitors are ill-prepared to respond. - This involves understanding their goals, assumptions, and capabilities to anticipate and influence their reactions. **Competitor Intelligence System:** - The need for systematic competitor data collection is highlighted, including sources such as public reports, press coverage, customer and supplier intelligence, and employee insights. - Establishing a formal competitor intelligence system ensures efficient data gathering, analysis, and communication to decision-makers. **Chapter 4: Market Signals** Market signals -- actions by competitors that indicate their intentions, motives, or internal situation -- are crucial for enriching competitor analysis and guiding strategic decisions. **Types of Signals:** - **Prior Announcements of Moves:** Formal communications about future actions, often serving as preemptive moves, threats, tests of competitor sentiments, conciliatory gestures, or communication with the financial community. - **Announcements of Results or Actions After the Fact:** Disclosure of information, sometimes selectively or even misleadingly, to influence competitor behavior. - **Public Discussions of the Industry by Competitors:** Commentary on industry conditions, forecasts, and competitor moves, revealing assumptions and often containing implicit pleas for cooperation or price discipline. - **Competitors\' Discussions of Their Own Moves:** Explanations or discussions aimed at justifying actions, communicating commitment, or deterring others from following. - **Competitors\' Tactics Relative to What They Could Have Done:** The specific choices of strategic variables, such as price, advertising levels, and capacity additions, signal motives and intentions. - **Manner in Which Strategic Changes Are Implemented:** Timing, location, and initial target of strategic changes can distinguish between aggressive moves and those seeking industry-wide benefit. - **Divergence from Past Goals or Industry Precedent:** Deviations from historical patterns signal potential shifts in strategy or competitive intentions. - **The Cross-Parry:** Responding to a competitor\'s move in one area with a move in a different area, indirectly signaling displeasure and raising the threat of retaliation. - **The Fighting Brand:** Introduction of a brand to punish or threaten a competitor, often serving as a warning or deterrent. - **Private Antitrust Suits:** Signals of displeasure, harassment, or delaying tactics, particularly when filed by weaker firms against stronger ones. **Using History and Avoiding Distraction:** - Studying a competitor\'s history of signaling and actions can improve the accuracy of signal interpretation. - While signals can be subtle and open to misinterpretation, ignoring them altogether is akin to ignoring competitors. Strategic decisions should be informed by a balanced approach to competitor analysis and signal interpretation. **Chapter 5: Competitive Moves** This chapter delves into the art of making effective competitive moves in oligopolistic settings, where firms are mutually dependent and actions often provoke reactions. **Industry Instability:** - The likelihood of competitive outbreaks is influenced by industry structure -- greater rivalry is expected in industries with numerous competitors, slow growth, high fixed costs, low differentiation, and high exit barriers. - Competitor analysis is crucial for understanding individual firm situations, probable moves, and their ability to defend against moves by rivals. - The flow of information among firms, including shared knowledge of industry conditions and the ability to signal intentions, also impacts stability. **Types of Moves:** - **Cooperative or Nonthreatening Moves:** Actions that do not jeopardize competitor goals, such as improving internal practices, making changes that benefit everyone if followed, or pursuing opportunities competitors will not match. - **Threatening Moves:** Actions that improve a firm\'s position at the expense of competitors, requiring careful consideration of the likelihood, speed, effectiveness, and toughness of retaliation. - **Defensive Moves:** Actions to deter or defend against competitor moves, including disciplining moves with immediate retaliation, denying a base to new entrants, or establishing credible commitments to retaliate. **Commitment:** - Commitment is crucial for both offensive and defensive moves. It communicates a firm\'s resources and intentions unequivocally, shaping competitor perceptions and deterring undesirable actions. - **Types of Commitment:** - Commitment to sticking with a move - Commitment to retaliating against competitor moves - Commitment to forgoing damaging actions (creating trust) **Communicating Commitment:** - Requires visible assets and mechanisms to carry out the commitment, a clear history of honoring past commitments, perceived inability to back down, and the ability to detect noncompliance. - Achieved through past behavior, building retaliatory resources, publicizing commitments, creating irreversible actions, and establishing monitoring systems. **Focal Points:** - In oligopolistic settings, identifying focal points -- prominent resting places on which competitive adjustments can converge -- helps coordinate competitor expectations and avoid disruptive battles. - This involves identifying desirable focal points early, simplifying industry variables to facilitate focal point identification, and strategically influencing the emergence of favorable focal points. **Information and Secrecy:** - Information is a key resource in making competitive moves. Selective disclosure can enhance signaling and communication of commitments, while excessive disclosure can aid competitors. **Chapter 6: Strategy Toward Buyers and Suppliers** Beyond the broad industry perspective, this chapter examines strategies for managing relationships with specific buyers and suppliers, emphasizing the strategic importance of these interactions. **Buyer Selection:** - Recognizing that buyer groups are heterogeneous, the choice of target customers becomes a crucial strategic variable, particularly in mature or undifferentiated industries. - **Characteristics of Good Buyers:** - Purchasing needs that match the firm\'s relative capabilities. - High growth potential. - Low intrinsic bargaining power and propensity to exercise it. - Low cost of servicing. - **Strategic Implications of Buyer Selection:** - Firms with cost leadership can sell to powerful, price-sensitive buyers. - Firms without cost or differentiation advantages must be selective to achieve above-average returns. - Firms can influence buyer characteristics through strategy, such as building switching costs or shifting the decision-maker to less price-sensitive individuals. - High-cost buyers can be eliminated if their other characteristics are not sufficiently attractive. **Broadening the Basis of Buyer Choice:** - Shifting buyer focus from purchase price to other dimensions where the firm has a distinctive advantage, such as responsive service, engineering assistance, or product features. - Redefining the product\'s function by highlighting additional factors like resale value, maintenance costs, and revenue-generating capacity. **Purchasing Strategy:** - The analysis of supplier power and the principles of buyer selection can guide purchasing strategies. - **Key Issues:** - **Stability and Competitiveness of Supplier Pool:** Choosing suppliers that will maintain or improve their competitive position. - **Optimal Degree of Vertical Integration:** Balancing the benefits and costs of internalizing supplier functions. - **Allocation of Purchases Among Qualified Suppliers:** Spreading purchases, creating competition, and maximizing bargaining power without becoming overly dependent on single suppliers. - **Creating Leverage with Chosen Suppliers:** Avoiding switching costs, promoting standardization, creating a threat of backward integration, and utilizing tapered integration where feasible. **Chapter 7: Structural Analysis Within Industries** This chapter extends the framework of structural analysis to explain performance differences among firms within the same industry. **Dimensions of Competitive Strategy:** - Firms employ diverse strategies along various dimensions, including specialization, brand identification, channel selection, product quality, technological leadership, vertical integration, cost position, service, price policy, leverage, and relationship with parent company and government. - These dimensions typically form internally consistent sets, leading to a variety of distinct strategies within an industry. **Strategic Groups:** - Firms with similar strategies along these dimensions form strategic groups, exhibiting similar market shares and responses to industry events. - Identifying strategic groups reveals how the five forces affect different firms within an industry and helps explain performance disparities. - **Mobility Barriers:** Analogous to entry barriers, mobility barriers deter firms from shifting strategic positions within an industry. These barriers are a major factor explaining persistent profitability differences among strategic groups. **Analyzing Strategic Groups:** - Mapping strategic groups based on key strategic dimensions reveals their competitive positions and interactions. - Analyzing mobility barriers protecting each group helps predict threats and potential shifts in firm positions. - Assessing the bargaining power of each group with buyers and suppliers sheds light on their relative profitability. - Evaluating each group\'s vulnerability to substitutes and rivalry from other groups highlights competitive pressures they face. **Determinants of Firm Profitability:** 1. Common industry characteristics affecting all firms equally. 2. Characteristics of the strategic group (mobility barriers, bargaining power, substitute vulnerability, and intergroup rivalry exposure). 3. Firm\'s position within its strategic group (degree of intragroup competition, relative scale, entry costs, and implementation ability). **Debunking Myths:** - **Market Share and Profitability:** The highest market share does not guarantee the highest profitability. In industries with limited scale economies or where differentiation or focus are key, smaller firms can outperform larger ones. - **Cost Leadership as the Only Sustainable Strategy:** While cost position is important, other viable strategies based on differentiation, focus, or other mobility barriers can also achieve superior profitability. **The Strategic Group Map as an Analytical Tool:** - Selecting strategic variables that define key mobility barriers and reflect strategic diversity. - Identifying mobility barriers protecting each group, analyzing marginal groups, charting strategic movement directions, analyzing trend impacts, predicting industry reactions, and assessing competitor responses. **Chapter 8: Industry Evolution** Industry evolution, driven by dynamic forces that create pressures for change, is a critical aspect of strategy formulation. **Basic Concepts:** - **Product Life Cycle:** While a useful starting point, the product life cycle has limitations as a predictor of industry evolution as it assumes a single, invariable pattern of change. - **Evolutionary Processes:** Analyzing the forces driving industry change, such as demographic shifts, changing needs, and technological innovations, provides a more robust framework for understanding and predicting evolution. **Driving Forces of Industry Evolution:** 1. **Long-Run Changes in Growth:** - Demographics - Trends in needs - Change in relative position of substitutes and complements - Penetration of the customer group 2. **Changes in Buyer Segments Served:** - Emergence of new segments - Segmentation of existing segments - Elimination of segments 3. **Buyers\' Learning:** - Reduced product differentiation as buyers become more sophisticated. - Increasing demands for warranty protection, service, and improved performance. 4. **Reduction of Uncertainty:** - Resolution of technological uncertainties. - Imitation of successful strategies and abandonment of unsuccessful ones. - Entry of larger, established firms. 5. **Diffusion of Proprietary Knowledge:** - Erosion of technological advantages through various mechanisms, including competitor observation, embodiment in capital goods, personnel turnover, and increased availability of specialized personnel. 6. **Accumulation of Experience:** - Potential for cost advantages based on cumulative volume, but dependent on the ability to keep experience proprietary. 7. **Expansion (or Contraction) in Scale:** - Widening of strategic options. - Increased economies of scale, capital requirements, and vertical integration. - Potential entry of larger firms. - Changes in supplier and buyer power. 8. **Changes in Input and Currency Costs:** - Direct effects on product costs and demand. - Indirect effects on cost curves, production organization, and global competition. 9. **Product, Marketing, and Process Innovation:** - Creation of new needs, enhanced differentiation, and cost reductions. - Shifts in mobility barriers and industry structure. 10. **Structural Change in Adjacent Industries:** - Changes in supplier and buyer power due to concentration, vertical integration, or shifting competitive methods. 11. **Government Policy Change:** - Direct effects through regulation of entry, competition, or profitability. - Indirect effects through product quality and safety standards, environmental regulations, and tariffs. 12. **Entries and Exits:** - New entrants bringing fresh resources and perspectives, potentially triggering structural changes. - Exiting firms reducing industry capacity and potentially increasing concentration. **Key Relationships in Industry Evolution:** - **Industry Consolidation:** Concentration is not inevitable. Consolidation is more likely when mobility barriers are high and exit barriers are low. - **Changing Industry Boundaries:** Structural changes often expand or contract industry boundaries, bringing new competitors or substitutes into play. - **Influence of Firm Strategies:** Firms can actively shape industry evolution through their strategic choices, investments, and responses to external forces. **Part II: Generic Industry Environments** **Chapter 9: Competitive Strategy in Fragmented Industries** This chapter focuses on the strategic challenges of competing in fragmented industries, where no single firm holds a significant market share or wields substantial influence. **Causes of Fragmentation:** - **Low Overall Entry Barriers:** A prerequisite for fragmentation, but usually accompanied by other factors: - **Absence of Economies of Scale or Experience Curve:** Limited potential for cost advantages based on size or cumulative volume. - **High Transportation Costs:** Limiting the radius a plant can economically service. - **High Inventory Costs or Erratic Sales Fluctuations:** Discouraging large-scale facilities and continuous operation. - **No Advantages of Size in Dealing with Buyers or Suppliers:** Limited bargaining power derived from size. - **Diseconomies of Scale:** Potential disadvantages of size in managing complex product lines, maintaining low overhead, or providing personalized service. - **Diverse Market Needs:** Fragmented buyer tastes and demand for specialized products. - **High Product Differentiation (Based on Image):** Limiting market share and allowing inefficient firms to survive. - **Exit Barriers:** Keeping marginal firms in the industry and discouraging consolidation. - **Local Regulation or Government Prohibition of Concentration:** Restricting firm size and market share. - **Newness of the Industry:** Limited time for firms to develop dominant positions. **Overcoming Fragmentation:** - **Create Economies of Scale or Experience Curve:** Through technological innovation or process improvements. - **Standardize Diverse Market Needs:** Through product or marketing innovations that coalesce buyer tastes or reduce the cost of standardized varieties. - **Neutralize or Split Off Fragmentation-Causing Aspects:** Decoupling production or service delivery from other aspects of the business through franchising, multiple brand names, or specialized labels. - **Make Acquisitions for Critical Mass:** Achieving a threshold share through acquisitions to gain scale advantages. - **Recognize Industry Trends Early:** Positioning to exploit trends that naturally drive consolidation, such as changing buyer needs or technological advancements. **Industries "Stuck" in Fragmentation:** - Fragmentation can persist due to firms lacking resources or skills, myopia or complacency, or lack of attention by outside firms with resources to drive consolidation. - Recognizing such \"stuck\" industries offers significant strategic opportunities for entrants who can overcome fragmentation without facing high entry costs or retaliation. **Coping with Fragmentation:** - **Tightly Managed Decentralization:** Maintaining small, autonomous operations with strong central control and performance-oriented compensation for local managers. - **"Formula" Facilities:** Designing and replicating efficient, low-cost facilities at multiple locations. - **Increased Value Added:** Enhancing differentiation through superior service, fabrication, or subassembly. - **Specialization by Product, Customer, or Order Type:** Focusing on specific product lines, customer groups, or order types to gain expertise and bargaining power. - **Focus on a Geographic Area:** Blanketing a specific region to achieve local economies of scale and market penetration. - **Bare Bones/No Frills:** Emphasizing low overhead, tight cost control, and price competitiveness. - **Backward Integration:** Lowering costs and creating a cost advantage over competitors. **Potential Strategic Traps:** - **Seeking Dominance:** Futile in fragmented industries unless the underlying causes of fragmentation can be altered. - **Lack of Strategic Discipline:** Essential for success as focus or specialization is crucial for navigating the intense competition. - **Overcentralization:** Counterproductive in industries requiring local management, personalized service, and quick response. - **Assuming Competitors Have the Same Overhead and Objectives:** Ignoring the unique characteristics of small, privately held firms with potentially lower costs and different goals. - **Overreacting to New Products:** Making excessive investments in response to initial high margins that quickly erode as competition intensifies. **Formulating Strategy:** 1. Conduct a comprehensive industry and competitor analysis. 2. Identify the causes of fragmentation and their relationship to industry economics. 3. Assess the potential for overcoming fragmentation through innovation or strategic change. 4. If fragmentation can be overcome, predict the consolidated industry\'s structure and determine the best defendable position for the firm. 5. If overcoming fragmentation is unlikely, choose the best strategy for coping with the fragmented structure, considering the firm\'s specific resources and capabilities. **Chapter 10: Competitive Strategy in Emerging Industries** Emerging industries, newly formed or redefined by technological advancements, changing costs, or emerging needs, present unique challenges and opportunities for strategy formulation. **The Structural Environment:** - **Technological Uncertainty:** Multiple competing product configurations and production technologies. - **Strategic Uncertainty:** Wide variety of strategic approaches and limited information about competitors, customers, and industry conditions. - **High Initial Costs but Steep Cost Reduction:** High costs due to low volume and newness, declining rapidly as firms gain experience and scale. - **Embryonic Companies and Spin-offs:** Prevalence of newly formed firms and firms created by personnel leaving existing companies to pursue new ideas. - **First-Time Buyers:** The marketing challenge of inducing substitution and educating buyers about the new product or service. - **Short Time Horizon:** Focus on immediate needs and expedient solutions, leading to the development of \"conventional wisdom\" based on chance or limited experience. - **Subsidy:** Government or other financial support, often creating instability and government involvement. - **Early Mobility Barriers:** - Proprietary technology - Access to distribution channels - Access to raw materials and skilled labor - Cost advantages from experience - Risk **Problems Constraining Industry Development:** - **Inability to Obtain Raw Materials and Components:** Shortages and high prices due to limited supplier capacity. - **Absence of Infrastructure:** Lack of established distribution channels, service facilities, trained personnel, or complementary products. - **Absence of Product or Technological Standardization:** Impeding supply, cost improvements, and customer confidence. - **Perceived Likelihood of Obsolescence:** Buyers waiting for technological progress and cost reductions to stabilize. - **Customers\' Confusion:** Multiplicity of product approaches and conflicting claims, raising perceived purchase risk. - **Erratic Product Quality:** Damaging industry image and credibility. - **Poor Image and Credibility with the Financial Community:** Affecting financing and customer credit availability. - **Regulatory Approval:** Delays and red tape in gaining regulatory recognition and approval. - **High Costs:** Requiring initial pricing below cost or limiting industry development. - **Response of Threatened Entities:** Industries producing substitutes, labor unions, or distribution channels resisting the new industry\'s growth. **Strategic Choices:** - **Shaping Industry Structure:** Influencing the rules of the game in areas like product policy, marketing, and pricing to achieve a favorable long-run position. - **Balancing Industry Advocacy and Self-Interest:** Cooperating to promote standardization, address quality issues, and build industry credibility while pursuing individual market position. - **Adapting to Shifting Mobility Barriers:** Preparing for the erosion of early barriers and the emergence of new ones, requiring capital commitments and strategic adjustments. - **Timing Entry:** - **Early Entry (Pioneering):** High risk, but potentially lower entry barriers and higher returns. - **Late Entry:** Lower risk, but potentially higher entry barriers and lower returns. **Tactical Moves:** - Secure early commitments from suppliers to ensure raw material availability. - Time financing to take advantage of favorable financial market conditions. **Coping with Competitors:** - Avoid excessive resource expenditure on defending high market share against competitors with limited long-term potential. - Consider encouraging entry by certain competitors through licensing or other means to foster industry development and build a known competitive landscape. **Techniques for Forecasting:** - Employ scenarios -- discrete, internally consistent views of future industry evolution -- to bound the range of possible outcomes and identify key events signaling which scenario is unfolding. - Consider multiple scenarios for product/technology evolution, market development, and competitive landscape, incorporating feedback loops and iteratively refining the forecasts. **Selecting Emerging Industries to Enter:** - Base entry decisions on a structural analysis, predicting the industry\'s ultimate structure and the firm\'s ability to create a defendable long-run position. - Consider factors beyond growth rate, current profitability, and ultimate market size, focusing on the attractiveness of the future industry structure and the firm\'s resources relative to evolving mobility barriers. **Chapter 11: The Transition to Industry Maturity** The transition to maturity, characterized by slowing growth and a shift in competitive dynamics, poses significant strategic and organizational challenges for firms. **Industry Change During Transition:** 1. **Increased Competition for Market Share:** Requires a new competitive mindset and reassessment of competitor behavior. 2. **Shift to Experienced, Repeat Buyers:** Demands a strategic focus on brand choice and differentiation. 3. **Emphasis on Cost and Service:** Necessitates cost-cutting measures, process improvements, and enhanced customer service capabilities. 4. **Topping-Out Problem in Capacity and Personnel:** Requires careful monitoring of capacity additions, strategic timing of investments, and adaptation to slower growth. 5. **Changes in Functional Methods:** Necessitates strategic reorientation or adjustments to cope with new manufacturing, marketing, distribution, and research approaches. 6. **Scarcity of New Products and Applications:** Requires a shift in R&D focus from innovation to refinement and standardization. 7. **Increased International Competition:** Demands adaptation to new competitors with different cost structures and goals. 8. **Falling Industry Profits:** Requires careful cost control, strategic repositioning, and a long-term perspective. 9. **Falling Dealer Margins but Increased Dealer Power:** Requires strategic attention to dealer relationships and management of channel power. **Strategic Implications:** - **Confronting the Strategic Dilemma:** Maturity often forces firms to choose among the generic strategies of cost leadership, differentiation, or focus. - **Sophisticated Cost Analysis:** Rationalizing the product mix and implementing accurate pricing based on detailed cost data become crucial. - **Process Innovation and Design for Manufacture:** Emphasizing cost-efficient manufacturing processes and designing products for ease of production gain importance. - **Increasing Scope of Purchases:** Focusing on increasing sales to existing customers through product upgrades, line extensions, or ancillary services. - **Acquiring Cheap Assets:** Exploiting opportunities to acquire distressed companies or liquidated assets at bargain prices to enhance cost position. - **Buyer Selection:** Identifying and locking in \"good\" buyers becomes essential as buyer sophistication and bargaining power increase. - **Exploiting Different Cost Curves:** Designing processes for flexibility and responsiveness to serve niche segments with custom orders or specialized needs. - **Competing Internationally:** Expanding into markets where the industry is at an earlier stage of development or where structural conditions are more favorable. - **Considering Disinvestment:** Evaluating whether strategic adjustments are justified, considering available resources and long-term industry profitability prospects. **Strategic Pitfalls:** 1. **Inaccurate Self-Perceptions and Industry Perceptions:** Failing to adapt assumptions about capabilities and industry dynamics to the changing environment. 2. **Caught in the Middle:** Continuing a strategy of compromise that becomes unsustainable as competition intensifies. 3. **The Cash Trap:** Investing to build share in a mature market with limited prospects for recouping investments. 4. **Giving Up Share Too Easily:** Sacrificing long-term market position for short-run profit preservation. 5. **Resisting Price Competition:** Failing to adapt to the increased importance of cost and price competitiveness. 6. **Resisting Changes in Industry Practices:** Clinging to outdated approaches to marketing, production, or distribution. 7. **Overemphasizing New Products:** Failing to shift focus from radical innovation to refinement and standardization of existing products. 8. **Clinging to \"Higher Quality\":** Using quality as an excuse to avoid price or marketing adjustments, even as buyers become more willing to trade quality for price. 9. **Overhanging Excess Capacity:** Pressures to utilize excess capacity leading to strategic compromises or inefficient investments. **Organizational Implications:** - **Shifting Competitive Focus:** Adapting organizational structure and systems to support new strategic priorities, such as cost control, customer service, and marketing effectiveness. - **Formalizing Control and Incentive Systems:** Implementing tighter budgeting, stricter controls, and performance-based incentives. - **Enhancing Coordination:** Increasing cross-functional and inter-unit coordination to achieve cost competitiveness and responsiveness. - **Managing Motivational Challenges:** - Scaling down expectations for financial performance and advancement opportunities. - Fostering discipline and a focus on efficiency. - Developing new motivational and reward mechanisms. - Placing greater emphasis on the human dimension and building internal loyalty. - Recentralizing control to enhance cost efficiency and coordination. **Industry Transition and the General Manager:** - The general manager faces a difficult adaptation to the new "way of life" in a mature industry, requiring new skills, a shift in priorities, and a change in organizational atmosphere. - **Potential Outcomes:** - Denial of transition and clinging to outdated strategies. - Leaving active management due to dissatisfaction or inadequate skills. **Chapter 12: Competitive Strategy in Declining Industries** This chapter tackles the often-overlooked strategic challenges of competing in declining industries, going beyond the simplistic \"harvest and divest\" advice. **Structural Determinants of Competition in Decline:** - **Demand Conditions:** - **Uncertainty:** Whether decline will continue or revitalize heavily influences rivalry. Uncertainty breeds aggressive attempts to hold position. - **Rate and Pattern of Decline:** Slow decline masks trends and increases uncertainty. Rapid decline facilitates capacity withdrawal. Erratic decline complicates trend analysis. - **Structure of Remaining Demand Pockets:** Profitability depends on the attractiveness of remaining segments. Segments with price-insensitive buyers, low bargaining power, immunity to substitutes, and strong mobility barriers offer better prospects. - **Causes of Decline:** Understanding the cause (technological substitution, demographics, shifts in needs) helps predict uncertainty levels and the attractiveness of remaining segments. - **Exit Barriers:** High exit barriers keep unprofitable firms in the market, intensifying rivalry and depressing profitability. Exit barriers can be: - **Economic:** Specialized assets with low liquidation value, high fixed costs of exit. - **Strategic:** Interrelatedness with other businesses, dependence on financial markets, vertical integration. - **Informational:** Difficulty in isolating performance of declining business. - **Managerial/Emotional:** Management\'s pride, loyalty, fear of career impact. - **Governmental/Social:** Job loss concerns, community pressure. - **Mechanism for Asset Disposition:** Selling assets within the industry (instead of retiring them) intensifies rivalry. Government subsidies artificially prolong the life of inefficient firms. - **Volatility of Rivalry:** Declining sales amplify factors that intensify rivalry (commoditization, high fixed costs, high concentration, strategic importance, balanced competition, uncertainty about relative strength). **Strategic Alternatives in Decline:** - **Leadership:** Aim to become the dominant firm in the remaining market, exploiting a favorable industry structure for decline. Requires aggressive investment to drive out competitors and secure a profitable end-game. - **Niche:** Identify and specialize in a structurally attractive segment, potentially employing tactics from the leadership strategy to reduce rivalry. - **Harvest:** Maximize short-term cash flow by minimizing investment and maximizing price realization or exploiting residual strengths. Requires favorable industry structure and inherent strengths to avoid share loss. - **Quick Divestment:** Sell the business early to maximize recovery value before decline is obvious and the market for assets softens. **Choosing a Strategy:** The optimal strategy depends on the industry structure for decline, the firm\'s relative strengths in remaining segments, its exit barriers, and its strategic needs. A favorable structure and strong position support leadership or niche strategies. An unfavorable structure or weak position favors harvest or quick divestment. Strategic needs can override these considerations. Early commitment to a strategy can create advantages. **Pitfalls in Decline:** - **Failure to Recognize Decline:** Optimism bias, narrow focus on substitutes, high exit barriers can prevent objective assessment. - **War of Attrition:** Fighting competitors with high exit barriers is usually disastrous and costly for all involved. - **Harvesting without Clear Strengths:** Firms without unique advantages risk rapid share loss and profit erosion when cutting investment, raising prices, or reducing service. **Preparing for Decline:** During maturity, minimize future exit barriers, focus on favorable segments, and build switching costs to improve position for decline. **Chapter 13: Competition in Global Industries** This chapter addresses the increasing prevalence of global industries, where competitive advantage in a given market is fundamentally affected by a firm\'s global position. **Sources and Impediments to Global Competition:** - **Sources of Global Competitive Advantage:** - **Conventional Comparative Advantage:** Factor cost or quality differences among countries. - **Economies of Scale/Learning Curves:** Benefits of larger volume or cumulative experience exceeding individual market sizes. - **Product Differentiation Advantages:** Enhanced reputation and credibility from global presence. - **Public-Good Character of Information/Technology:** Ability to leverage knowledge and technology across markets. - **Impediments to Global Competition:** - **Economic:** High transportation/storage costs, differing product needs, established distribution channels, local sales/repair requirements, sensitivity to lead times, complex market segmentation, limited global demand. - **Managerial:** Varied marketing tasks, intensive local service requirements, rapid technological change. - **Institutional:** Governmental impediments (tariffs, quotas, local content requirements, preferential treatment of local firms), perceptual/resource limitations of firms. **Evolution to Global Industries:** Triggered by environmental changes (increased scale economies, lower transportation costs, changing distribution channels, shifting factor costs, narrowing national differences, reduced government constraints) or strategic innovations by firms (product redefinition, segment identification, cost reduction for adaptations, design changes, production deintegration, overcoming resource/perceptual limitations). Access to the large U.S. market often plays a critical role in globalization. **Competition in Global Industries:** - **Industrial Policy and Competitive Behavior:** Home governments often play an active role in shaping strategy, supporting firms, and potentially influencing global market outcomes. Competitor analysis must consider the firm and its home government as a unit. - **Relationships with Host Governments:** Host governments can impede or support global firms. Firms must decide on their level of responsiveness to host government concerns. - **Systemic Competition:** Competition is viewed as a global system of interconnected positions. Firms may make defensive investments to prevent rivals from gaining systemic advantages. - **Difficulty in Competitor Analysis:** Limited data on foreign firms, complex institutional factors, systemic relationships complicate the process. **Strategic Alternatives in Global Industries:** - **Broad Line Global Competition:** Compete worldwide in the full product line, aiming for global cost leadership or differentiation. Requires substantial resources and a long-term commitment. - **Global Focus:** Target a specific industry segment globally, choosing segments with low impediments and defendable positions. - **National Focus:** Exploit national market differences to achieve a focused strategy in a particular country or region. - **Protected Niche:** Seek markets with government restrictions that exclude global competitors. Transnational coalitions, or cooperative agreements between firms from different countries, are increasingly prevalent in global industries. **Trends Affecting Global Competition:** Narrowing differences among countries, more aggressive industrial policies, national recognition and protection of distinctive assets, freer flow of technology, emergence of new large-scale markets, and increasing competition from newly developed countries are shaping the future of global competition. **Part III: Strategic Decisions** **Chapter 14: The Strategic Analysis of Vertical Integration** This chapter analyzes the decision to vertically integrate, going beyond the simple \"make or buy\" calculation. **Strategic Benefits of Vertical Integration:** - **Economies of Integration:** Cost savings from combined operations, internal control/coordination, improved information flow, avoidance of market transactions, stable relationships leading to specialized procedures and product adaptation. - **Tap into Technology:** Gaining critical knowledge of upstream or downstream technologies. - **Assure Supply and/or Demand:** Reduce uncertainty about access to inputs or markets, particularly important in capital-intensive industries. Requires transfer pricing that reflects market conditions to avoid inefficiencies and strategic distortions. - **Offset Bargaining Power:** Counteract the leverage of powerful suppliers or buyers, reveal true input costs and allow for input mix optimization. - **Enhanced Ability to Differentiate:** Control more elements of the production/distribution process to enhance value added and create differentiation. - **Elevate Entry/Mobility Barriers:** Competitive advantages from integration can deter entry and raise barriers to shifting strategic positions. - **Enter a Higher-Return Business:** Integrate into an adjacent industry with higher profit potential. Requires overcoming entry barriers and exceeding the firm\'s opportunity cost of capital. - **Defend Against Foreclosure:** Secure access to supplies or markets when competitors are integrated and foreclosing options. **Strategic Costs of Vertical Integration:** - **Cost of Overcoming Mobility Barriers:** Integration requires overcoming entry barriers into the adjacent industry. - **Increased Operating Leverage:** Higher proportion of fixed costs magnifies earnings fluctuations from cyclical demand or other disruptions. - **Reduced Flexibility:** Difficulty in changing suppliers or customers when internal units become uncompetitive or technology changes. - **Higher Exit Barriers:** Increased asset specialization, interrelationships, and emotional ties can lock firms into declining businesses. - **Capital Investment Requirements:** Integration consumes capital that has an opportunity cost elsewhere in the firm. Capital demands of integrated units can drain resources from other businesses. - **Foreclosure of Technology:** Integration can cut off access to R&D and know-how from independent suppliers or customers. - **Maintaining Balance:** Imbalances in capacity between stages can force the firm to sell/buy from competitors or sacrifice market position. - **Dulled Incentives:** Captive internal transactions can reduce performance incentives for both upstream and downstream units. The \"bad apple\" problem arises when a sick unit\'s problems spread to its healthy partner. - **Differing Managerial Requirements:** Vertically related businesses often require different management skills and organizational approaches. Applying a common approach can be detrimental. These benefits and costs should be considered in light of current and future industry structure. The possibility of achieving some benefits through long-term contracts should always be explored, particularly when the costs and risks of integration are high. **Tapered Integration:** Partial integration can reduce some costs and risks while retaining some benefits. It provides a credible threat of full integration and offers a detailed understanding of costs in the adjacent stage. However, it requires dealing with competitors and may increase coordination costs. **Quasi-Integration:** Strategies such as minority equity investments, loans, exclusive dealing agreements, and joint R&D can create a community of interest and achieve some benefits of integration without the full costs. **Illusions in Vertical Integration Decisions:** Avoid common misperceptions: 1. Strong market position automatically extends vertically. 2. Internal operations are always cheaper. 3. Integration into competitive businesses is advantageous. 4. Integration can save a strategically sick business. 5. Experience in one stage qualifies management for another. **Chapter 15: Capacity Expansion** This chapter addresses capacity expansion as a critical strategic decision, particularly in commodity businesses where overbuilding is a chronic problem. **Elements of the Capacity Expansion Decision:** 1. **Identify Options:** Consider size of additions, degree of vertical integration, and the influence of the firm\'s decision on competitors. 2. **Forecast Demand, Costs, and Technology:** Project future demand, input prices (accounting for potential price increases from capacity additions), and technological changes that might affect capacity requirements. Use scenarios to cope with uncertainty. 3. **Forecast Competitors\' Behavior:** Predict how each competitor will add capacity based on their expectations about demand, costs, and technology. Consider industry leadership and potential for preemption. 4. **Predict Industry Capacity and Market Shares:** Combine competitors\' and the firm\'s capacity additions to estimate industry supply, market shares, and resulting prices. 5. **Estimate Cash Flows:** Use predicted prices and costs to forecast cash flows from the investment. 6. **Check for Inconsistencies:** Revise the analysis to ensure a logical and internally consistent outcome based on rational competitor behavior. Uncertainty levels play a major role in determining the capacity expansion process. High uncertainty leads to an orderly process driven by differences in risk aversion. Low uncertainty promotes preemptive behavior, with firms racing to lock up market share, potentially leading to overbuilding. **Causes of Overbuilding Capacity:** - **Technological:** Lumpy capacity additions, economies of scale/learning curve, long lead times, increasing MES, changing production technologies. - **Structural:** High exit barriers, supplier/lender forcing, need to build credibility with buyers, integrated competitors, demand dependence on capacity share/age, local image and reputation importance. - **Competitive:** Large number of firms, lack of credible leadership, new entrants, first-mover advantages. - **Information Flow:** Inflation of future expectations, divergent assumptions, breakdown of market signaling, structural change, financial community pressure. - **Managerial:** Production orientation, asymmetric aversion to risk (greater penalty for undercapacity than overcapacity). - **Governmental:** Perverse tax incentives, desire for indigenous industry, pressure to maintain employment. **Checks Against Overbuilding:** Financing constraints, company diversification, infusion of finance-oriented management, higher capacity costs (e.g., pollution control), high uncertainty, past overcapacity problems. Firms can influence the capacity expansion process by signaling their intentions, influencing competitors\' expectations about demand or technology, and demonstrating commitment. **Preemptive Strategies:** A risky strategy where the firm seeks to lock up market share by adding large capacity early, potentially deterring competitors and entrants. **Conditions for Success:** - Large capacity expansion relative to expected market size. - Significant economies of scale/learning curve. - Credibility of the preempting firm in executing the strategy. - Ability to signal preemptive motive before competitors commit. - Willingness of competitors to back down. Preemptive strategies are risky against competitors with noneconomic goals, strategic commitments to the business, or superior staying power. **Chapter 16: Entry into New Businesses** This chapter analyzes the strategic decision to enter a new business, either through internal development or acquisition. Both approaches require overcoming entry barriers and managing competitor reactions. **Entry Through Internal Development:** - **Analyze Structural Entry Barriers and Retaliation:** Estimate the cost of overcoming structural barriers, the probability and severity of incumbent retaliation, and the likely duration of negative effects. - **Industries Prone to Retaliation (Risky Targets):** Slow growth, commodity products, high fixed costs, high concentration, incumbents with high strategic stakes, management attitudes prone to aggressive response. - **Favorable Industries for Internal Entry:** Industries in disequilibrium (new industries, rising entry barriers, poor information), industries with weak or slow incumbent response, industries where the firm has lower entry costs, industries where the firm can influence structure, industries that benefit existing businesses. **Generic Concepts for Entry:** Reduce product costs, buy in with low price, offer a superior product/service, discover a new niche, introduce a marketing innovation, leverage existing distribution relationships. **Entry Through Acquisition:** - **Efficient Market for Companies:** The price of an acquisition is set in the market for companies, which tends to eliminate above-average returns for the buyer. The seller\'s alternative of operating the business creates a floor price. - **Conditions for Profitable Acquisitions:** - Low floor price due to seller\'s circumstances or pessimism about future prospects. - Imperfections in the market for companies that prevent full price discovery: - Buyer has superior information. - Limited number of bidders. - Unfavorable economic conditions. - Sick selling company. - Seller has noneconomic objectives. - Unique ability of the buyer to operate the acquired business: - Distinctive ability to improve the seller\'s operations. - Industry meets criteria for internal entry (disequilibrium, weak retaliation). - Acquisition uniquely benefits the buyer\'s existing businesses. - **Irrational Bidders:** Carefully analyze the motives and situations of other bidders who may have unique advantages or noneconomic objectives that drive up prices beyond rational levels. **Sequenced Entry:** Entering a less desirable strategic group initially and then moving to the target group can lower entry costs and risks by accumulating knowledge and resources gradually and tempering competitor response. Firms should analyze potential sequenced entry paths and invest in mobility barriers to block them.

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser