Dual Process Theories and Affect Misattribution PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by IntricatePrehistoricArt
Tags
Summary
This document provides an overview of dual process theories like impression formation, attribution models, elaboration likelihood model, and heuristic-systematic model. It covers attitude-behavior models, prejudice, and stereotypes using the affect misattribution procedure (AMP) model. The document summarizes key concepts, general procedure, and experimental overview.
Full Transcript
**1. Dual Process Theories Overview** - Dual process theories divide mental processes into **automatic** (quick, unconscious) and **controlled** (deliberate, effortful) categories. - Early models addressed specific phenomena (e.g., impression formation), while generalized models so...
**1. Dual Process Theories Overview** - Dual process theories divide mental processes into **automatic** (quick, unconscious) and **controlled** (deliberate, effortful) categories. - Early models addressed specific phenomena (e.g., impression formation), while generalized models sought domain-independent principles. - Formalized models use mathematical techniques to analyze the joint contributions of automatic and controlled processes. **2. Phenomenon-Specific Models** - **Impression Formation**: Explores how stereotypes or category-based information dominate early impressions but can shift to person-specific details under certain conditions. - **Attribution Models**: Explain how people infer others\' traits or motives (e.g., the \"fundamental attribution error\"). - Examples: - **Two-Stage Model (Trope, 1986)**: Includes automatic behavior identification followed by controlled dispositional inference. - **Three-Stage Model (Gilbert, 1998)**: Adds situational correction, emphasizing cognitive effort to adjust initial judgments. **3. Persuasion Dual Models** - Models like the **Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)** and **Heuristic-Systematic Model (HSM)** describe when people rely on superficial cues (automatic processing) versus in-depth argument analysis (controlled processing). **4. Attitude-Behavior Models** - The **MODE Model (Fazio, 1990)** examines how motivation and opportunity affect whether attitudes guide behavior automatically or through deliberation. **5. Prejudice and Stereotyping** - **Dissociation Model (Devine, 1989)** highlights the automatic activation of stereotypes and the effortful rejection of prejudicial beliefs. - Research on **weapon bias** shows how stereotypes influence split-second decisions, revealing that even well-intentioned individuals can exhibit biases unintentionally. **6. Generalized Dual Models** - **System 1 and System 2 Processing (Kahneman, 2003)**: - System 1 is intuitive, fast, and automatic. - System 2 is logical, slow, and deliberate, often monitoring or adjusting System 1 outputs. **7. Formalized Models** - These models, like **Process Dissociation (Jacoby, 1991)**, quantify how automatic and controlled processes interact, particularly under tasks with opposing influences. **8. Applications and Criticisms** - Applications include addressing societal issues like prejudice through bias-reduction strategies (e.g., cognitive training, counter-stereotypic thinking). - Criticisms include reliance on conceptual frameworks without novel empirical predictions. Lesson 10: Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) ------------------------------------------------ ### **Step 1: Key Concepts** 1. **Misattribution**: - **Definition**: Mistaking the source of an emotional reaction (e.g., a reaction caused by a prime is mistakenly attributed to something else). - Example: Feeling tense because of a loud noise but attributing it to the people around you. 2. **Projection**: - **Definition**: A type of misattribution where the source is within oneself, but the reaction is attributed externally. - Example: Feeling nervous and assuming someone else is upset with you. 3. **Affect**: - **Definition**: A basic emotional reaction (pleasant or unpleasant). ### **Step 2: General Procedure of AMP** 1. **Setup**: - Participants are shown a **prime** (an image or object) designed to elicit a positive or negative reaction. - Next, they see a neutral, ambiguous **target** (e.g., a Chinese pictograph or abstract symbol). 2. **Task**: - Participants are asked to judge the target (pleasant or unpleasant). - **Instruction**: Ignore the prime and focus only on the target. 3. **Goal**: - Measure how the emotional reaction caused by the prime influences the judgment of the target. - This demonstrates **affective transfer**---the emotional impact of the prime gets \"projected\" onto the target. ### **Step 3: Key Assumptions of AMP** - **Affective Transfer**: Participants unintentionally project their feelings from the prime onto the target. - **Implicit Nature**: - Participants are not asked to report attitudes directly. - Even when warned to avoid bias, misattribution still occurs, showing it is unintentional. ### **Step 4: Experiments Overview** #### Experiment 1--4: - **Purpose**: Test the replicability and reliability of AMP. - **Findings**: - Priming effects were strong and resistant to warnings. - Factors like longer prime-target intervals reduced, but did not eliminate, the priming effect. #### Experiment 6 (Measuring Racial Attitudes): 1. **Design**: - Participants saw primes (images of Black or White individuals) followed by ambiguous Chinese pictographs. - Task: Judge the pictograph as \"pleasant\" or \"unpleasant.\" - Conditions: With or without a warning about potential bias. 2. **Findings**: - White participants judged targets more positively after White primes than Black primes. - Warnings had no effect on reducing bias. - Highly motivated participants showed a mismatch between their explicit (self-reported) and implicit (AMP) racial attitudes. ### **Step 5: Why Does AMP Work?** 1. **Automatic Processes**: - AMP taps into quick, automatic evaluations that are hard to control. - The effects occur even when participants are warned or instructed to avoid bias. 2. **Efficient and Rapid**: - Judgments are made very quickly, preventing deliberate thought. 3. **Unawareness**: - Participants are often unaware that their judgments are influenced by the prime. ### **Step 6: Key Lessons from AMP** 1. **Automaticity**: - AMP reveals implicit attitudes that participants might not admit or even realize they hold. 2. **Resilience to Warnings**: - Even explicit warnings to avoid bias do not stop the effects of priming. 3. **Measuring Implicit Attitudes**: - AMP is particularly useful for exploring sensitive topics like racial bias, where explicit self-reports might be unreliable. ### **Step 7: Conclusion** - AMP highlights how unconscious emotional reactions (affect) can influence judgments in ways people cannot control. - It is a powerful tool for studying implicit attitudes and understanding how automatic processes shape social cognition. Lesson 11-12: Attention and Encoding ------------------------------------ ### **Step 1: What Are Attention and Encoding?** 1. **Attention**: - **Definition**: Whatever occupies your focus or consciousness. It is selective and involves effort. - **Two Components**: - **Direction**: What you focus on. - **Intensity**: How much mental effort you dedicate. - **Key Role**: Determines what enters thought and memory. 2. **Encoding**: - **Definition**: The process of transforming an external stimulus into an internal representation. - **Key Role**: Influences how we interpret, store, and later recall information. - **Attention**: You notice their face and voice. - **Encoding**: You remember their smile as \"friendly\" or \"kind.\" ### **Step 2: What Attracts Attention in Social Contexts?** 1. **Faces**: - Faces are key to social interaction and are automatically noticed. - **Gaze**: - Direct gaze grabs attention faster than averted gaze (Macrae et al., 2002). - Averted gaze also directs our attention (e.g., following someone's gaze to see what they're looking at). 2. **Face Perception**: - **Holistic Processing**: We perceive faces as a whole, not as individual parts (eyes, nose, etc.). - **Inversion Effect**: Recognizing inverted faces is much harder, as it disrupts holistic processing. - **Spontaneous Trait Inferences**: - We instantly infer traits from facial expressions (e.g., an angry face = \"hostile\"). - Judgments made in just 100 milliseconds can predict outcomes like elections (Todorov et al., 2005). 3. **Baby Faces**: - **Traits of Baby-Faced Adults**: - Perceived as warm, naive, and less dominant. - **Evolutionary Perspective**: - Baby-like features trigger caregiving instincts, which can influence judgments of adults with such features. 4. **Salience**: - Salient stimuli stand out because they are unique in their context (e.g., being the only woman in a male-dominated meeting). - **Effects**: - Salience leads to extreme evaluations (positive or negative). - Salience amplifies attention and influences impressions. 5. **Vividness**: - **Definition**: Stimuli that are emotionally interesting, imagery-provoking, or close in time/space. - **Example**: A vivid story about a plane crash may stick with you more than a statistic about crashes. - **Impact**: Surprisingly, vivid stimuli often have less impact on judgments than expected. ### **Step 3: Accessibility** 1. **Definition**: The readiness with which a category or concept comes to mind. - Influenced by: - **Recency**: Recently activated concepts (e.g., \"adventurous\" after reading about explorers). - **Frequency**: Regularly activated concepts (e.g., \"trustworthy\" for a probation officer who evaluates honesty daily). 2. **Priming**: - **Definition**: Exposure to one stimulus influences how you interpret subsequent stimuli. - **Example**: - Priming \"politeness\" makes someone wait longer before interrupting. - **Situational Accessibility**: - Concepts primed before encoding (e.g., \"hostility\") influence how ambiguous behavior is interpreted. 3. **Chronic Accessibility**: - Some categories are always accessible due to frequent activation or personal history. - **Example**: An individual who values honesty might interpret ambiguous actions as honest or dishonest automatically. ### **Step 4: Assimilation vs. Contrast** 1. **Assimilation**: - **Definition**: Interpreting a stimulus consistently with the activated category. - **Example**: After discussing \"daylight,\" you interpret \"light\" as brightness. 2. **Contrast**: - **Definition**: Interpreting a stimulus as opposite to the activated category. - **Example**: If primed with \"hostility\" using extreme examples like \"Dracula,\" you might judge a target as less hostile to create contrast. 3. **Conditions**: - **Assimilation**: Likely when stimuli are ambiguous or priming is subconscious. - **Contrast**: Likely when priming is obvious or the stimulus is unambiguous. ### **Step 5: Summary of Key Insights** - **Attention** determines what we focus on and ultimately encode into memory. - **Encoding** transforms external stimuli into internal representations, influenced by attention, accessibility, and priming. - **Priming** shapes interpretation and memory, both in the short and long term. - **Faces** and social stimuli like salience and vividness are strong drivers of attention, but their impact varies. - **Accessibility**---recent, frequent, or chronic---profoundly influences perception and memory.