Artificial Intelligence: Uninformed Search, Problem Solving by Searching

Document Details

ContrastyAcer6410

Uploaded by ContrastyAcer6410

Khalifa University of Science and Technology

Tags

artificial intelligence search algorithms problem solving uninformed search

Summary

This document explores uninformed search strategies in artificial intelligence. It covers breadth-first search, depth-first search, and related algorithms. The document examines the search space as a tree and discusses the evaluation criteria for various search strategies.

Full Transcript

Artificial Intelligence Solving Problems by Searching Uninformed search Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› 1. Introduction to Search ◼ Search is one of the most powerful approaches to problem solving in AI ◼ Search is a universal problem solving...

Artificial Intelligence Solving Problems by Searching Uninformed search Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› 1. Introduction to Search ◼ Search is one of the most powerful approaches to problem solving in AI ◼ Search is a universal problem solving mechanism that ◼ Systematically explores the alternatives ◼ Finds the sequence of steps towards a solution Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Introduction to Search: Popular Classical Problem Domains ◼ 8-puzzle ◼ Block World ◼ Tower of Hanoi ◼ Travelling Salesperson ◼ Missionaries and ◼ Crossword Puzzle Cannibals ◼ Crypt-arithmetic ◼ Vacuum World ◼ Wheel of Fortune ◼ Chess, Bridge, etc Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Search paradigms ◼ Uniformed search ◼ Blind, naïve ◼ Brute force ◼ Informed search ◼ Guided with heuristics ◼ Optimal Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› 2. Defining a Search Problem ◼ State Space: described by an initial state and the set of possible actions available (operators). ◼ A path is any sequence of actions that lead from one state to another. ◼ Goal test: applicable to a single state problem to determine if it is the goal state. ◼ Path cost: relevant if more than one path leads to the goal, and we want the shortest (the least cost) path. Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› 2.1 Toy Problems (1) 8-puzzle problem Fig 4.1 ◼ Initial State: The location of each of the 8 tiles in one of the nine squares ◼ Operators: blank moves (1) Left (2) Right (3) Up (4) Down ◼ Goal Test: state matches the goal configuration ◼ Path cost: each step costs 1, total path cost = no. of steps Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Toy Problems (2) 8-queens problem Fig 4.2 ◼ Initial State: Any arrangement of 0 to 8 queens on board. ◼ Operators: add a queen to any square. ◼ Goal Test: 8 queens on board, none attacked. ◼ Path cost: not applicable or Zero (because only the final state counts). Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› 2.2 Real-world Problems ◼ Route Finding - computer networks, automated travel advisory systems, airline travel planning. ◼ VLSI Layout - A typical VLSI chip can have as many as a million gates, and the positioning and connections of every gate are crucial to the successful operation of the chip. ◼ Robot Navigation - rescue operations ◼ Mars Pathfinder - search for Martians or signs of intelligent lifeforms ◼ Time/Exam Tables Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Simple Example ◼ Easiest to first look at simple examples based on searching for route on a map. School Factory Hospital Newsagent Library church Park University ◼ How do we systematically and exhaustively search possible routes, in order to find, say, route from library to university? Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› 3. Search Strategies ◼ Breadth-first search ◼ Depth-first search ◼ Depth-limited search ◼ Bi-directional search Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› General Search Problem graph Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Criteria for Evaluating Search Strategies Each of the search strategies are evaluated based on: ◼ Completeness: is the strategy guaranteed to find a solution when there is one? ◼ Time complexity: how long does it take to find a solution ◼ Space complexity: how much memory does it need to perform the search? ◼ Optimality: does the strategy find the highest- quality solution when there are several solutions? Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Tree Search Space ◼ The set of all possible states reachable from the initial state defines the search space. ◼ We can represent the search space as a tree. library school hospital park newsagent factory university church Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Tree Search Space parent node library Level 0 (root) children node school hospital Level 1 park newsagent factory Level 2 university church Level 3 edges Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Tree search complexity ◼ Parameters ◼ b: branching factor ◼ m:tree depth ◼ d: tree depth of the solution ◼ l: search depth limit Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Breadth first search Explore nodes in tree order: library, school, hospital, factory, park, newsagent, uni, church. (conventionally explore left to right at each level) library school hospital ◼ park newsagent factory university church Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Algorithm for breadth first ◼ keep track of the list of nodes found, but for which routes from them have yet to be considered. ◼ E.g., [school, hospital] -have found school and hospital in tree, but not yet considered the nodes connected to these. ◼ List is sometimes referred to as an agenda. But implemented using a queue. ◼ Queue : A list where nodes are added to the end of the list but removed from the front (first in -first out) Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Algorithm for breadth first: ◼ Start with queue = [initial-state] and found=FALSE. While queue not empty and not found do: Remove the first node N from queue. If N is a goal state, then found = TRUE. Find all the successor nodes of N, and put them on the end of the queue. End While Means nodes of the subsequent level Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Algorithm for breadth first: Exercise : Apply manually this algorithm on the previous tree and observe the evolution of the queue. And count the number of iterations in that algorithm Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Breadth-First Search Features ◼ Completeness: Yes ◼ Time complexity: bd ◼ Space complexity: bd ◼ Optimality: Yes Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide ‹#› Depth-First Search ◼ DFS always expands one of the nodes at the deepest level of the tree. ◼ The search only go back once it hits a dead end (a nongoal node with no expansion) ◼ DFS have modest memory requirements, it only needs to store a single path from root to a leaf node. ◼ For problems that have many solutions, DFS may actually be faster than BFS, because it has a good chance of finding a solution after exploring only a small portion of the whole space. Depth-first search ◼ Nodes explored in order: library, school, factory, hospital, park, newsagent, university. library school hospital park newsagent factory university church Algorithms for depth first ◼ Similar to BS but using a stack instead of a queue ◼ Stack: a list where node are added to front of to the list and also removed from the front of the list (first in-last out) Algorithm for depth first: ◼Start with stack = [initial-state] and found=FALSE. While stack not empty and not found do: Remove the first node N from stack. If N is a goal state, then found = TRUE. Find all the successor nodes of N, and put them on the end of the stack. End(While) Depth first ◼ One problem with DFS is that it can get stuck going down the wrong path. ◼ Many problems have very deep or even infinite search trees. ◼ DFS should be avoided for search trees with large or infinite maximum depths. ◼ It is common to implement a DFS with a recursive function that calls itself on each of its children in turn. Depth first: ◼ Completeness: No ◼ Time complexity: bd ◼ Space complexity: bd (better than BFS) ◼ Optimality: No ◼ DFS may suffer from non-termination when the length of a path in the search tree is infinite Artificial Intelligence – Solving Problems by Searching Slide 26 Algorithm for depth first: Exercise : Apply manually this algorithm on the previous tree. Observe the evolution of the stack , and count the number of iterations in that algorithm Searching Graphs ◼ Generally a tree cannot represent all the possible action in the search space. ◼ For example : We cannot get to the same node by different routes We cannot move in circles and get back from nodes we started from ◼ Such actions can be represented however using a Graph Searching Graphs: problems with simple tree search algorithms ◼ Simple tree search algorithms are not appropriate for arbitrary graphs, they might cause Repeat searching same nodes of the graph Infinite loops Searching Graphs: Example of Search repetition library Consider this graph corresponding to maps with one-way streets, but more that one route to the school hospital pahramcy park newsagent Apply the simple depth- factory first algorithm, and observe how the search progresses. Count the Pharmacy church number of iterations university Cafeteria Union Searching Graphs: Improved search techniques ◼ The simple search techniques can be improved by avoiding exploring the nodes that have been already visited ◼ For example by storing the visited nodes in a list or an array, that will be checked at each iteration Searching Graphs: Improved depth-first techniques ◼ Start with stack = [initial-state], found=FALSE, ◼ Visited = [ ] ◼ While stack not empty and not found do: ◼ Remove the first node N from stack ◼ If N is not in visited then ◼ Add N to visited ◼ If N is a goal state, then found = TRUE. ◼ Find all the successor nodes of N, and put them on the end of the stack. ◼ End if ◼ End(While) Searching Graphs: Improved depth-first techniques ◼ Exercise: Apply the improved version of the depth first algorithm to the previous graph. ◼ Observe the search progress and count the number of iterations. Returning the path ◼ So far the algorithms just indicate whether or not a goal (target state) exists. They do not actually return the successful path. ◼ How we can extract the path? One way: Add an agenda for paths (list of paths) Breadth first: returning the path ◼ Start with Q_node = [initial-state] ◼ Q_path =[ initial_path], and found=FALSE. While Q_node not empty and not found do: Remove the first node N from Q_node. Remove the first path P from Q_Path. If N is a goal state, then found = TRUE. Find all the successor nodes of N, and push them in Q_node. Find all the successor nodes of the path P, and put them in Q_path End(While) Breadth first: returning the path ◼Q_path =[ initial_path], and found=FALSE. While Q_path node not empty and not found do: Remove the first path P from Q_Path. Take the last Node N in the path Q If N is a goal state, then found = TRUE. Find all the successor nodes of the N path P, and append each to Q_path End(While) Returning the path Example: In the previous breadth first algorithm. The agenda contains initially [ {l} ] l: library After the first iteration: [{l,s}, {l,h} ] After the second iteration [ {l,s,f}, {l,h} ] After the third iteration [ {l,h,n}, {l,h,p} ,{l,s,f} ] Depth first: returning the path ◼ Start with S_node = [initial-state] ◼ S_path =[ initial_path], and found=FALSE. While S_node not empty and not found do: Remove the first node N from Q_node. Remove the first path P from Q_Path. If N is a goal state, then found = TRUE. Find all the successor nodes of N, and push them in S_node. Find all the successor nodes of the path P, and put them in S_path End(While)

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser