Why were the courtiers not on good terms with the Emperor's brother-in-law?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ca77/1ca77a70a6dc0f78906cffc3056bd42cfa8d084d" alt="Question image"
Understand the Problem
The question asks why the courtiers of an emperor were not on good terms with the emperor's brother-in-law. We must select the most plausible reason from the given multiple-choice options.
Answer
The answer is (A): The Emperor used to only heed his brother-in-law's advice.
The courtiers were not on good terms with the Emperor's brother-in-law because the Emperor only heeded his brother-in-law's advice. So the answer is (A).
Answer for screen readers
The courtiers were not on good terms with the Emperor's brother-in-law because the Emperor only heeded his brother-in-law's advice. So the answer is (A).
More Information
This question is likely derived from a reading comprehension exercise, where understanding the dynamics between characters is key to answering correctly.
Tips
Carefully consider the context of the question. Eliminate options that don't directly address the reason for the courtiers' animosity. Ensure the answer aligns with typical power dynamics in a court setting. Consider the impact of the Emperor's reliance on his brother-in-law.
Sources
- Aptitude Questions-Oriental Bank of Commerce(OBC) Placement ... - placement.freshersworld.com
- Test of English Language / Passage Reading. | Getpreparedexams - dvpjal.wordpress.com
- Oriental Bank of Commerce Probationary Officers solved English ... - jagranjosh.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information