Which Fibre Channel zoning method would be MOST suitable to minimize administrative overhead and disruption during frequent configuration changes?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking which Fibre Channel (FC) zoning method is most suitable for minimizing administrative overhead and disruption in a storage network with frequent configuration changes. We need to consider the characteristics of each zoning method (soft zoning, combined zoning, port zoning, and no zoning) and how they impact administrative effort and potential disruption during changes.
Answer
Peer zoning minimizes administrative overhead and disruption during frequent configuration changes.
Peer zoning (Target Driven Zoning) minimizes administrative overhead and disruption during frequent configuration changes. Autozone is other method to automate zoning of devices and reduce administrative overhead.
Answer for screen readers
Peer zoning (Target Driven Zoning) minimizes administrative overhead and disruption during frequent configuration changes. Autozone is other method to automate zoning of devices and reduce administrative overhead.
More Information
Peer zoning simplifies management by grouping initiators and targets into zones based on the target port, reducing the need to reconfigure zones when adding or removing initiators. Autozone automates the zoning process.
Tips
WWPN zoning can become cumbersome with frequent changes due to the need to update zones with each new device or modification. Avoid single-initiator zoning if scalability and ease of management are priorities.
Sources
- Cisco MDS 9000 Series Fabric Configuration Guide, Release 8.x - cisco.com
- NimbleOS 5.2: Simplify Fibre Channel Deployments with Target ... - community.hpe.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
