What is a primary criticism of the Audio-Lingual Method?
Understand the Problem
The question asks for a primary criticism of the Audio-Lingual Method, a language teaching methodology. We need to identify the main drawback of this method from the given options.
Answer
The Audio-Lingual Method is criticized for its limited focus on real-world communication and over-reliance on rote memorization.
A primary criticism of the Audio-Lingual Method is its limited focus on real-world language use and communicative competence. It overemphasizes controlled practice and rote memorization, hindering students' ability to apply their language skills in authentic communication scenarios.
Answer for screen readers
A primary criticism of the Audio-Lingual Method is its limited focus on real-world language use and communicative competence. It overemphasizes controlled practice and rote memorization, hindering students' ability to apply their language skills in authentic communication scenarios.
More Information
The Audio-Lingual Method (ALM) was widely used in the mid-20th century, particularly in the United States, but its popularity declined as more communicative approaches to language teaching emerged.
Tips
A common mistake is to only focus on one criticism, but the method has multiple significant drawbacks that are often interconnected.
Sources
- Criticisms of the Audio-Lingual Method | ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ITTT - teflonline.net
- Audio-lingual method - Wikipedia - en.wikipedia.org
- The Audio-Lingual Method: history, usage, pros and cons - grade-university.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
