What can be concluded about the Bhagwandas and Entores cases in relation to revocation?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking for an analysis of the Bhagwandas and Entores cases concerning the principle of revocation in contract law. It seeks to identify which conclusion best summarizes their implications, particularly in terms of communication methods and acceptance in contracts.
Answer
The Bhagwandas case endorsed Entores' principle that revocation is possible only before acceptance is complete.
The final answer is that the Bhagwandas case endorsed the principle of the Entores case regarding communication and acceptance of offers; revocation can only occur before acceptance is complete.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is that the Bhagwandas case endorsed the principle of the Entores case regarding communication and acceptance of offers; revocation can only occur before acceptance is complete.
More Information
The cases are significant in the development of contract law, especially regarding the modernization of communication methods like instantaneous communication. They outline rules about when acceptance is complete, affecting revocation possibilities.
Tips
A common mistake is confusing when the acceptance is considered complete, affecting the timing when revocation is allowed.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
