Express the square numbers lying between 200 and 300 as the product of two consecutive natural numbers increased by 1.

Understand the Problem

The question is asking to find square numbers that fall between 200 and 300 and express them as the product of two consecutive natural numbers with an additional increment of 1. We will identify the square numbers in the specified range and then determine if they can be represented in the required form.

Answer

There are no square numbers between 200 and 300 that satisfy the conditions given.
Answer for screen readers

There are no square numbers between 200 and 300 that can be expressed as the product of two consecutive natural numbers with an additional increment of 1.

Steps to Solve

  1. Identify the square numbers between 200 and 300

First, we need to find the natural numbers whose squares are within the range of 200 to 300. The square root of 200 is approximately $14.14$ and the square root of 300 is approximately $17.32$. Thus, we will check the squares of the integers from 15 to 17:

$$ 15^2 = 225 $$

$$ 16^2 = 256 $$

$$ 17^2 = 289 $$

The square numbers between 200 and 300 are 225, 256, and 289.

  1. Express square numbers as products of consecutive integers

Next, we will express each square number found as the product of two consecutive natural numbers plus 1. We can represent this mathematically as:

$$ n(n + 1) + 1 = n^2 + n + 1 $$

Now we'll check each of the square numbers:

  • For $225$: We set up the equation $n(n + 1) + 1 = 225$:

$$ n(n + 1) = 224 \quad \Rightarrow \quad n^2 + n - 224 = 0 $$

Now we can use the quadratic formula:

$$ n = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} = \frac{-1 \pm \sqrt{1 + 896}}{2} = \frac{-1 \pm 30}{2} $$

We get two potential solutions for $n$:

$$ n = \frac{29}{2} \text{ (not an integer)} \quad \text{and} \quad n = -15.5 \text{ (not a natural number)} $$

This means 225 cannot be expressed as the product of two consecutive numbers plus one.

  • For $256$: We set up the equation $n(n + 1) + 1 = 256$:

$$ n(n + 1) = 255 \quad \Rightarrow \quad n^2 + n - 255 = 0 $$

Using the quadratic formula:

$$ n = \frac{-1 \pm \sqrt{1 + 1020}}{2} = \frac{-1 \pm 32}{2} $$

This gives us:

$$ n = 15.5 \text{ (not an integer)} \quad \text{and} \quad n = -16.5 \text{ (not a natural number)} $$

Thus, 256 cannot be expressed this way.

  • For $289$: We set up the equation $n(n + 1) + 1 = 289$:

$$ n(n + 1) = 288 \quad \Rightarrow \quad n^2 + n - 288 = 0 $$

Using the quadratic formula:

$$ n = \frac{-1 \pm \sqrt{1 + 1152}}{2} = \frac{-1 \pm 34}{2} $$

This gives us:

$$ n = 16.5 \text{ (not an integer)} \quad \text{and} \quad n = -17.5 \text{ (not a natural number)} $$

Therefore, 289 cannot be expressed as a product of consecutive integers plus one.

  1. Conclusion about square numbers

After evaluating all three square numbers (225, 256, and 289), we find that none of them can be expressed as the product of two consecutive natural numbers with an increment of 1.

There are no square numbers between 200 and 300 that can be expressed as the product of two consecutive natural numbers with an additional increment of 1.

More Information

Square numbers are numbers that can be expressed as the square of an integer. In this case, all the square numbers within our specified range proved to not fit the criteria given in the question. It is an interesting exercise in exploring properties of numbers.

Tips

  • Failing to check whether the roots found in the quadratic equation are natural numbers.
  • Confusing products of natural numbers with other forms of numbers.
Thank you for voting!
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser