Do you agree with New London's reasoning about being 'too bright'? Do you agree with the judge's decision that it was not discriminatory to not hire people who are highly intellige... Do you agree with New London's reasoning about being 'too bright'? Do you agree with the judge's decision that it was not discriminatory to not hire people who are highly intelligent? Why or why not? How would you have determined the cognitive ability requirements for this job?
Understand the Problem
The question is discussing the evaluation of New London's hiring practices for police officers based on cognitive ability and intelligence. It requires an opinion on the validity of their reasoning and the judge's ruling, along with a potential approach to establishing cognitive requirements for the job.
Answer
Many disagree with the reasoning; cognitive requirements should reflect job needs.
It seems many people disagree with New London's reasoning and the judge's decision. Not hiring based on intelligence could be seen as unjust. Cognitive requirements should match the job's needs, focusing on skills that enhance police work without arbitrary limits on intelligence.
Answer for screen readers
It seems many people disagree with New London's reasoning and the judge's decision. Not hiring based on intelligence could be seen as unjust. Cognitive requirements should match the job's needs, focusing on skills that enhance police work without arbitrary limits on intelligence.
More Information
The decision sparked debate about hiring practices and discrimination. Critics argue that excluding candidates for being 'too bright' may overlook talented individuals who could excel in police work.
Tips
Avoid making arbitrary intelligence constraints; focus on holistic role requirements.
Sources
- HRD301 Chapter 5 Activity - HRD301A Applied Case Study City of ... - studocu.com
- New London Case Study Read the City of ... - Transtutors - transtutors.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
