Podcast
Questions and Answers
Which theoretical perspective most accurately synthesizes the multifaceted nature of workplace violence, incorporating physical, psychological, and organizational dimensions while accounting for both intentional and unintentional acts?
Which theoretical perspective most accurately synthesizes the multifaceted nature of workplace violence, incorporating physical, psychological, and organizational dimensions while accounting for both intentional and unintentional acts?
- Le Run's definition, focusing on poorly controlled aggression, refined to distinguish between physical, verbal, and psychological manifestations, thus excluding organizational factors.
- Benghozi's definition, centered on the intrusive nature of violence and its infringement on personal integrity, broadened to encompass only physical and psychological acts, ignoring unintentional harm.
- Frappat's linear model, which underscores the primacy of physical force and resultant damages as the singular determinant of violence.
- Michaud's construct, expanded to include unintentional physical acts and integrating Jauvin's organizational violence framework, complemented by Hirigoyen's insights on harassment. (correct)
Considering the interplay between individual and systemic factors in the manifestation of workplace violence, which intervention strategy demonstrates the most robust approach to mitigating its occurrence?
Considering the interplay between individual and systemic factors in the manifestation of workplace violence, which intervention strategy demonstrates the most robust approach to mitigating its occurrence?
- Conducting a comprehensive organizational audit to identify systemic stressors and inequities, followed by the implementation of targeted interventions to address root causes, alongside individual support services. (correct)
- Implementing mandatory anger management workshops for employees with a history of aggressive behavior, coupled with enhanced security measures to deter physical altercations.
- Establishing a confidential reporting system for incidents of harassment and aggression, combined with sensitivity training programs aimed at fostering a culture of respect and inclusivity.
- Enforcing zero-tolerance policies for all forms of workplace violence, coupled with disciplinary actions against perpetrators, while providing counseling services for victims.
Given the evolving landscape of workplace dynamics and the increasing prevalence of remote work arrangements, how can organizations effectively adapt existing frameworks for addressing workplace violence to ensure the safety and well-being of employees in virtual environments?
Given the evolving landscape of workplace dynamics and the increasing prevalence of remote work arrangements, how can organizations effectively adapt existing frameworks for addressing workplace violence to ensure the safety and well-being of employees in virtual environments?
- By exclusively focusing on physical security measures for employees' home offices, such as providing self-defense training and installing surveillance cameras.
- By expanding the definition of workplace violence to include cyberbullying, online harassment, and virtual forms of aggression, and developing specific policies and reporting mechanisms to address these issues. (correct)
- By assuming that traditional workplace violence prevention strategies are equally effective in virtual environments and requiring employees to adapt accordingly.
- By implementing virtual monitoring software to track employees' online interactions and identify instances of cyberbullying or harassment.
In the context of organizational violence, which strategy would MOST effectively address the insidious normalization of microaggressions and systemic inequities that perpetuate a hostile work environment?
In the context of organizational violence, which strategy would MOST effectively address the insidious normalization of microaggressions and systemic inequities that perpetuate a hostile work environment?
Considering the legal and ethical obligations of employers to provide a safe working environment, what preemptive measure demonstrates due diligence in mitigating the risk of foreseeable workplace violence?
Considering the legal and ethical obligations of employers to provide a safe working environment, what preemptive measure demonstrates due diligence in mitigating the risk of foreseeable workplace violence?
Which of the following responses exemplifies the MOST sophisticated understanding of the nuanced interaction between physical and psychological violence in the workplace, particularly in contexts where direct physical aggression is infrequent?
Which of the following responses exemplifies the MOST sophisticated understanding of the nuanced interaction between physical and psychological violence in the workplace, particularly in contexts where direct physical aggression is infrequent?
Given the limitations of purely reactive approaches to workplace violence, which prospective analytical framework would MOST effectively identify emergent patterns of conflict and prevent escalation to acute incidents?
Given the limitations of purely reactive approaches to workplace violence, which prospective analytical framework would MOST effectively identify emergent patterns of conflict and prevent escalation to acute incidents?
Considering the legal definitions of workplace harassment in the Republic of Korea and the economic incentives for addressing workplace violence globally, which statement most accurately encapsulates the multi-faceted responsibilities of a multinational corporation operating in both regions?
Considering the legal definitions of workplace harassment in the Republic of Korea and the economic incentives for addressing workplace violence globally, which statement most accurately encapsulates the multi-faceted responsibilities of a multinational corporation operating in both regions?
Given the evolving international recognition of a safe and healthy work environment as a fundamental right and the legal frameworks in Albania and Porto Rico, what strategic approach should a forward-thinking human resources (HR) department adopt to ensure comprehensive protection against workplace misconduct?
Given the evolving international recognition of a safe and healthy work environment as a fundamental right and the legal frameworks in Albania and Porto Rico, what strategic approach should a forward-thinking human resources (HR) department adopt to ensure comprehensive protection against workplace misconduct?
Considering the varied definitions of workplace harassment and violence across different national contexts (e.g., Republic of Korea, Mexico, Ireland), and the overarching emphasis on a 'safe and healthy work environment' as a fundamental right, how should a global organization harmonize its policies to ensure comprehensive protection against workplace misconduct?
Considering the varied definitions of workplace harassment and violence across different national contexts (e.g., Republic of Korea, Mexico, Ireland), and the overarching emphasis on a 'safe and healthy work environment' as a fundamental right, how should a global organization harmonize its policies to ensure comprehensive protection against workplace misconduct?
Given the legal obligations for employers to protect their personnel and prevent workplace harassment, and considering the range of potential scenarios outlined in Ireland's Code of Practice (e.g., supervisor to employee, client to employee), how can an organization most effectively cultivate a culture of accountability and respect?
Given the legal obligations for employers to protect their personnel and prevent workplace harassment, and considering the range of potential scenarios outlined in Ireland's Code of Practice (e.g., supervisor to employee, client to employee), how can an organization most effectively cultivate a culture of accountability and respect?
Considering the economic arguments in favor of addressing workplace violence and harassment, alongside the potential legal ramifications such as civil liability in Porto Rico, what metrics should an organization prioritize to evaluate the efficacy and return on investment (ROI) of its workplace safety initiatives?
Considering the economic arguments in favor of addressing workplace violence and harassment, alongside the potential legal ramifications such as civil liability in Porto Rico, what metrics should an organization prioritize to evaluate the efficacy and return on investment (ROI) of its workplace safety initiatives?
Within the framework defined by the Bureau International du Travail and the WHO (2000), what nuanced delineation distinguishes 'physical violence' from 'psychological violence' in the workplace, especially considering the potential for overlap in manifestations?
Within the framework defined by the Bureau International du Travail and the WHO (2000), what nuanced delineation distinguishes 'physical violence' from 'psychological violence' in the workplace, especially considering the potential for overlap in manifestations?
Considering the European Commission's (1995) definition of workplace violence, what critical element differentiates an 'incident' from a systemic issue of workplace abuse, thereby necessitating distinct intervention strategies?
Considering the European Commission's (1995) definition of workplace violence, what critical element differentiates an 'incident' from a systemic issue of workplace abuse, thereby necessitating distinct intervention strategies?
How does 'mobbing,' as a form of workplace harassment, conceptually differ from 'bullying,' and what implications does this distinction hold for designing effective preventative measures and remediation strategies within organizations?
How does 'mobbing,' as a form of workplace harassment, conceptually differ from 'bullying,' and what implications does this distinction hold for designing effective preventative measures and remediation strategies within organizations?
In the context of Jauvin's (2003) categories of workplace sexual violence, how does the nuance between 'sexual threats' and 'sexual attacks' influence the perceived severity, legal ramifications, and psychological impact on the victim, especially when considering the spectrum of non-physical and physical transgressions?
In the context of Jauvin's (2003) categories of workplace sexual violence, how does the nuance between 'sexual threats' and 'sexual attacks' influence the perceived severity, legal ramifications, and psychological impact on the victim, especially when considering the spectrum of non-physical and physical transgressions?
In the context of inter-individual conflicts at work, which statement most accurately reflects the nuanced interplay between hierarchical status, perception of violence, and legal considerations, assuming a legal system prioritizing both justice and contextual understanding?
In the context of inter-individual conflicts at work, which statement most accurately reflects the nuanced interplay between hierarchical status, perception of violence, and legal considerations, assuming a legal system prioritizing both justice and contextual understanding?
According to Lempen (2006), how does the 'quid pro quo' form of sexual harassment fundamentally differ from the creation of a 'hostile work environment,' and what are the critical legal and ethical considerations distinguishing these two forms in organizational policy and judicial proceedings?
According to Lempen (2006), how does the 'quid pro quo' form of sexual harassment fundamentally differ from the creation of a 'hostile work environment,' and what are the critical legal and ethical considerations distinguishing these two forms in organizational policy and judicial proceedings?
In the context of workplace violence, beyond the immediately visible physical and psychological impacts, what subtler, long-term organizational consequences might arise from unchecked incidents of aggression, harassment, or intimidation, and how might these manifest across diverse facets of organizational function and culture?
In the context of workplace violence, beyond the immediately visible physical and psychological impacts, what subtler, long-term organizational consequences might arise from unchecked incidents of aggression, harassment, or intimidation, and how might these manifest across diverse facets of organizational function and culture?
Considering the dynamics of workplace harassment, how does an organization's structure, coupled with management's approach, impact the prevalence and nature of such behaviors, assuming a workforce composed of individuals with varying degrees of resilience and susceptibility to stress?
Considering the dynamics of workplace harassment, how does an organization's structure, coupled with management's approach, impact the prevalence and nature of such behaviors, assuming a workforce composed of individuals with varying degrees of resilience and susceptibility to stress?
Given Lewin's framework, how do different management styles modulate the risk and manifestation of workplace harassment, accounting for the complex interactions between power dynamics, role ambiguity, and leadership inaction, and assuming a diverse workforce with varying psychological needs?
Given Lewin's framework, how do different management styles modulate the risk and manifestation of workplace harassment, accounting for the complex interactions between power dynamics, role ambiguity, and leadership inaction, and assuming a diverse workforce with varying psychological needs?
Considering the legal ramifications of workplace misconduct, how does the intent behind a 'joke' with sexual undertones influence its admissibility as evidence in a harassment case, particularly when assessing whether such humor contributes to a hostile work environment, irrespective of its subjective interpretation by different employees?
Considering the legal ramifications of workplace misconduct, how does the intent behind a 'joke' with sexual undertones influence its admissibility as evidence in a harassment case, particularly when assessing whether such humor contributes to a hostile work environment, irrespective of its subjective interpretation by different employees?
What are the critical, yet often overlooked, intersections between workplace violence, organizational culture, and systemic inequities, and how might these intersecting factors synergistically exacerbate the risk and impact of violence, particularly for marginalized or vulnerable employee populations?
What are the critical, yet often overlooked, intersections between workplace violence, organizational culture, and systemic inequities, and how might these intersecting factors synergistically exacerbate the risk and impact of violence, particularly for marginalized or vulnerable employee populations?
If an organization is experiencing a high rate of inter-individual conflicts, including instances of perceived harassment, what multi-faceted approach should HR prioritize to reduce the impact using a multi-modal analytical approach?
If an organization is experiencing a high rate of inter-individual conflicts, including instances of perceived harassment, what multi-faceted approach should HR prioritize to reduce the impact using a multi-modal analytical approach?
Considering the interplay among diverse forms of workplace violence, the impact of organizational culture, and the role of leadership in setting ethical standards, which intervention strategy would most effectively preempt escalating conflicts?
Considering the interplay among diverse forms of workplace violence, the impact of organizational culture, and the role of leadership in setting ethical standards, which intervention strategy would most effectively preempt escalating conflicts?
In the sphere of sexual harassment prevention within organizations, what advanced strategies—beyond traditional training programs and policy implementations—can be deployed to foster a culture of respect and inclusivity, particularly in addressing the more subtle, insidious forms of harassment that may not be explicitly codified in existing legal frameworks?
In the sphere of sexual harassment prevention within organizations, what advanced strategies—beyond traditional training programs and policy implementations—can be deployed to foster a culture of respect and inclusivity, particularly in addressing the more subtle, insidious forms of harassment that may not be explicitly codified in existing legal frameworks?
In the context of workplace harassment, what specific attributes of 'laissez-faire' management render it especially conducive to fostering such behaviors, and how can HR intervene?
In the context of workplace harassment, what specific attributes of 'laissez-faire' management render it especially conducive to fostering such behaviors, and how can HR intervene?
How might the principles of restorative justice be applied within an organizational context to address inter-individual conflicts, particularly in situations that do not meet the threshold for formal disciplinary action but nonetheless disrupt workplace harmony?
How might the principles of restorative justice be applied within an organizational context to address inter-individual conflicts, particularly in situations that do not meet the threshold for formal disciplinary action but nonetheless disrupt workplace harmony?
Considering the evidence that workplace conflicts are associated with diminished productivity and increased employee turnover intentions, what strategic interventions can an organization deploy to mitigate these adverse outcomes and foster a more resilient and engaged workforce?
Considering the evidence that workplace conflicts are associated with diminished productivity and increased employee turnover intentions, what strategic interventions can an organization deploy to mitigate these adverse outcomes and foster a more resilient and engaged workforce?
Given the complexities inherent in diagnosing and addressing workplace harassment, what methodological rigor should underpin investigations to effectively overcome challenges posed by subjectivity, power dynamics, and potential biases? Assuming a robust legal framework and ethical guidelines, what investigative approach is most appropriate?
Given the complexities inherent in diagnosing and addressing workplace harassment, what methodological rigor should underpin investigations to effectively overcome challenges posed by subjectivity, power dynamics, and potential biases? Assuming a robust legal framework and ethical guidelines, what investigative approach is most appropriate?
Assuming an organization is committed to fostering a psychologically safe work environment and preventing workplace violence, what integrated metrics should it prioritize to holistically assess the effectiveness of its interventions and identify areas for continuous improvement, moving beyond traditional indicators?
Assuming an organization is committed to fostering a psychologically safe work environment and preventing workplace violence, what integrated metrics should it prioritize to holistically assess the effectiveness of its interventions and identify areas for continuous improvement, moving beyond traditional indicators?
Within the framework of Hirigoyen's (1998) characterization of perpetrators of violence, which of the following constellations of traits most accurately reflects the sine qua non of a narcissistic pervert's disposition?
Within the framework of Hirigoyen's (1998) characterization of perpetrators of violence, which of the following constellations of traits most accurately reflects the sine qua non of a narcissistic pervert's disposition?
Considering the dual risk profiles of violence victims identified by Vartia (1996), Coyne et al. (2000), and Zapf (1999), what nuanced interplay between individual characteristics and environmental factors most accurately elucidates the heightened vulnerability of the 'hard' profile?
Considering the dual risk profiles of violence victims identified by Vartia (1996), Coyne et al. (2000), and Zapf (1999), what nuanced interplay between individual characteristics and environmental factors most accurately elucidates the heightened vulnerability of the 'hard' profile?
How does the concept of 'survictimization,' as articulated by Filizzola & Lopez (1995) and Chappell & Di Martino (1998), interface with Desrumaux et al.'s (2005) findings regarding the perception of responsibility in repeat victimization within organizational contexts?
How does the concept of 'survictimization,' as articulated by Filizzola & Lopez (1995) and Chappell & Di Martino (1998), interface with Desrumaux et al.'s (2005) findings regarding the perception of responsibility in repeat victimization within organizational contexts?
In what way does Fattah's (1971) exploration of victimogenic predispositions—encompassing bio-physiological, psychological, and social determinants—complicate the etiological understanding of workplace violence, and what are the ethical ramifications of incorporating such factors into preventative strategies?
In what way does Fattah's (1971) exploration of victimogenic predispositions—encompassing bio-physiological, psychological, and social determinants—complicate the etiological understanding of workplace violence, and what are the ethical ramifications of incorporating such factors into preventative strategies?
To what extent does Lerner's (1980) Just World Theory (JWT) elucidate the cognitive biases underlying the attribution of blame to victims of workplace violence, and how does the interplay between perceived victim fragility and assigned responsibility manifest within organizational power dynamics?
To what extent does Lerner's (1980) Just World Theory (JWT) elucidate the cognitive biases underlying the attribution of blame to victims of workplace violence, and how does the interplay between perceived victim fragility and assigned responsibility manifest within organizational power dynamics?
In what critical manner do individual, organizational, and societal factors interact to shape the landscape of workplace violence, and how can the interplay between these factors inform the development of more efficacious and holistic preventative interventions?
In what critical manner do individual, organizational, and societal factors interact to shape the landscape of workplace violence, and how can the interplay between these factors inform the development of more efficacious and holistic preventative interventions?
Given the variability in perpetrator and victim profiles, what Bayesian analytical approach could be employed to iteratively refine predictive models of workplace violence, accommodating both individual and organizational variables while minimizing false positives and maximizing intervention efficacy?
Given the variability in perpetrator and victim profiles, what Bayesian analytical approach could be employed to iteratively refine predictive models of workplace violence, accommodating both individual and organizational variables while minimizing false positives and maximizing intervention efficacy?
Considering the interactional nature of workplace violence, what specific organizational interventions could most effectively mitigate the impact of inter-individual conflicts arising from disparate conflict resolution styles and personality clashes, while simultaneously fostering a culture of mutual respect and psychological safety?
Considering the interactional nature of workplace violence, what specific organizational interventions could most effectively mitigate the impact of inter-individual conflicts arising from disparate conflict resolution styles and personality clashes, while simultaneously fostering a culture of mutual respect and psychological safety?
Given the pervasive influence of organizational culture on the manifestation of workplace violence, what multifaceted approach could an organization adopt to proactively cultivate a culture characterized by psychological safety, mutual respect, and ethical leadership, thereby mitigating the risk of both overt and subtle forms of aggression?
Given the pervasive influence of organizational culture on the manifestation of workplace violence, what multifaceted approach could an organization adopt to proactively cultivate a culture characterized by psychological safety, mutual respect, and ethical leadership, thereby mitigating the risk of both overt and subtle forms of aggression?
How might advanced computational modeling, incorporating elements of system dynamics and agent-based simulation, be employed to forecast the cascading effects of specific workplace violence interventions across diverse organizational strata, accounting for feedback loops, emergent behaviors, and the propagation of norms?
How might advanced computational modeling, incorporating elements of system dynamics and agent-based simulation, be employed to forecast the cascading effects of specific workplace violence interventions across diverse organizational strata, accounting for feedback loops, emergent behaviors, and the propagation of norms?
Flashcards
Violence (General)
Violence (General)
An act that harms physical, moral, cultural, or symbolic integrity.
Aggression
Aggression
Intentional actions aimed at causing harm to another person.
Maltreatment
Maltreatment
Behaviors considered inappropriate or excessive.
Harassment
Harassment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Urban Violence
Urban Violence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Workplace violence
Workplace violence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Physical Violence (Workplace)
Physical Violence (Workplace)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Psychological Violence (Workplace)
Psychological Violence (Workplace)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Workplace Violence (EU Definition)
Workplace Violence (EU Definition)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Deviant Behaviors (Workplace)
Deviant Behaviors (Workplace)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Mobbing
Mobbing
Signup and view all the flashcards
Bullying
Bullying
Signup and view all the flashcards
Abusive Sexual Behaviors
Abusive Sexual Behaviors
Signup and view all the flashcards
Quid Pro Quo Harassment
Quid Pro Quo Harassment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Hostile Work Environment
Hostile Work Environment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Perverse Narcissist
Perverse Narcissist
Signup and view all the flashcards
"Weak" Victim Profile
"Weak" Victim Profile
Signup and view all the flashcards
"Tough" Victim Profile
"Tough" Victim Profile
Signup and view all the flashcards
Sur-Victimization
Sur-Victimization
Signup and view all the flashcards
Victimogenic Predispositions
Victimogenic Predispositions
Signup and view all the flashcards
Just World Theory
Just World Theory
Signup and view all the flashcards
Attributing Fault to the Victim
Attributing Fault to the Victim
Signup and view all the flashcards
Organizational factors influencing workplace violence
Organizational factors influencing workplace violence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Inter-individual Conflicts
Inter-individual Conflicts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Organization of Work
Organization of Work
Signup and view all the flashcards
Workplace Tension
Workplace Tension
Signup and view all the flashcards
Social Support at Work
Social Support at Work
Signup and view all the flashcards
Hierarchical Harassment
Hierarchical Harassment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Organizational Dysfunction & Harassment
Organizational Dysfunction & Harassment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Authoritarian Management
Authoritarian Management
Signup and view all the flashcards
Laissez-faire Management
Laissez-faire Management
Signup and view all the flashcards
Laissez-faire consequences
Laissez-faire consequences
Signup and view all the flashcards
Violence & Work Organization
Violence & Work Organization
Signup and view all the flashcards
Isolation
Isolation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Hostility from Superiors
Hostility from Superiors
Signup and view all the flashcards
Workplace Harassment (South Korea)
Workplace Harassment (South Korea)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Workplace Violence (Mexico)
Workplace Violence (Mexico)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Workplace Bullying (Ireland)
Workplace Bullying (Ireland)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Right to a Safe Workplace
Right to a Safe Workplace
Signup and view all the flashcards
Legal Obligations (Workplace Safety)
Legal Obligations (Workplace Safety)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- Emna Bechrifa is a medical doctor and resident in occupational medicine
Definition of Violence
- Michaud (1986) defines violence as an act that undermines physical and moral integrity, possessions, or cultural and symbolic participation
- Le Run Jean-Louis (2012) states violence results from poorly controlled aggression, whether physical, verbal, or psychological
- Benghozi (2010) defines violence, whether physical, psychological, or sexual, as intrusive and harmful to one's integrity
- Frappat (2000) defines violence solely as physical, involving the use of force and resulting harm
Types of Violence
- Physical violence involves the use of force, which causes physical harm
- Psychological harm involves behaviors which affect moral and emotional state
Specific Forms of Violence
- Aggressions intend to cause harm
- Inappropriate or excessive behaviors are considered as mistreatment (Spratlen, 1994)
- Harassment is a repetitive conduct that impairs dignity and psychological or physical health
Contextual Violence
-
Can occur in domestic settings (Lapierre, 2010)
-
Can occur in urban settings (Collovald, 2001)
-
Can occur in the workplace (Courcy, Brunet & Savoie, 2004)
-
Can occur in an organizational setting (Jauvin, 2003)
-
There are two main categories of violence
-
Physical violence: includes physical attacks and unintentional harm
-
Psychological violence: includes verbal and nonverbal actions that are meant to wound
Definitions of Violence
- Violence involves the use of force that causes either physical, sexual, or psychological damage
- Psychological violence is the use of authority that harms personal development (Bureau International du Travail & OMS, 2000)
- Any incident involving offensive behavior, dangers, or attacks in a professional environment is violence (Commission européenne, 1995)
Workplace Violence
- Workplace violence includes violations of organizational norms
- Harassment: Targeted exclusion repeated by a group
- Bullying: Intimidation involving difference in power
- Isolated acts: Examples of sexual harassment
Sexual Harassment
Jauvin, 2003 Categories:
- Abusive sexual behaviors
- Sexual threats: Example, threatening unwanted touching or a non-consensual acts
- Sexual assault: Example, undoing a colleague’s bra strap
- Deviant sexual behaviors
- Sexual harassment: Explicit messages or ambiguous gestures
Forms of Sexual Harassment (Lempen, 2006):
- Sexual bribery: Requesting sexual favors in order for work advancement
- Uncomfortable climate: Creating an intimidating or oppressive environment using conduct which gives sexual innuendo, even without intending to harm
Violence: Examples
- Physical Violence includes physical attacks and contact
- Psychological violence includes any form of verbal violence, humiliation, intimidation, or threats
- Psychological violence also involves making fun of someone's family, sexual orientation, gender identity, and race
- Setting impossible goals or deadlines, changing work schedules, intentionally withholding information, & social exclusion are all also violence
Workplace Violence is psychology
- According to Courcy & Savoie (2003), workplace violence is a violation of organizational policies by a member of that organization with the intent to harm other members
Factors of Workplace Violence
- Workplace violence is influenced by individual factors
- Workplace violence is influenced by organizational factors
- Workplace violence is influenced by societal factors
Individual Factors of Violence
-
Several studies reveal that women are victims of moral harassment more often
-
Other data show no marked differences in gender
-
Individuals of the same sex tend to endure more abuse (Geuzaine & Faulx, 2003)
-
Author Characteristics
-
Are likely to have psychological/addictive disorders
-
Tend to have type-A behavior
-
Are seen as narcissists by Hirigoyen.
Victim Characteristics
- High-risk groups are passive, and have little self-worth, where those that are strong get labeled as instigators (Vartia, 1996; Coyne et al., 2000; Zapf, 1999)
Key Concept
- A previous victim is more prone to be victims to the violence again
- Past abuses may have caused predisposition of person aggressed
- Persons who have been previously harassed are seen as personally responsible
Victim Characteristics Theory
- Fattah (1971) states that victims provoke due to their personality. This violence is rooted bio-socially and psychologically, it does reduce a harasser's liability
The Just World belief
-
The victim is to credit for what happened in order to feel the world is just, especially if seen as weak
-
It is crucial to recognize that workplace violence is fostered through several causes
Organizational Elements
- Interpersonal arguments
- Workplace structure
- Management Style
- Organizational Culture
Conflicts in Employees
- The Workplace:
- Tension from workplace can increase with the stress of work
Social support
- Violence reduces when those working together have great social support.
Hierarchy
- Violence is shown to decrease as the hierarchy lessens; however the workplace is more critical of the same actions from supervisors (Keegan, 1995)
- Those in authority who show harassment are viewed more harshly, apart from those with existing mental problems
Workplace structure
- Workplace violence is possibly the result of how the organization and management acts
- The result of the company's mental limits is that harassment is viewed as alienation
- Developing harassment is simple to do in the workplace due to poor structures
3 types of administration (Lewin, 1939)
- 1 Authoritative administration
- 2 Management that involves doing nothing at all
- 3 Democratic administrators
Pathogenic administrative technics (Pezé-Grenier, 2019)
- Make an unbalance of roles
- Involve excessive control and abusive verifications
Leadership:
- Psychological harrasment isn't seen with fair collaborative management (Skogstad et al., 2011).
Workplace Norms
- Each company has values that impact those they work with
- If administration does not show action, violence in the workplace escalates
- Workplace aggression increases in highly competitive situations
The working environment of current day
- Hierarchal supervision escalates from those who are not involved to being involved in their jobs
Support system for individuals
- Social system is effective in stopping harassment.
New work shifts
- The workforce is usually either now called:
- Neo-Taylorism which takes over a heritage for their workers
- Post-Taylorism which is dominated through the workers
Taylorism in 20th century
- The industrial work became more psychological
- Naturally the factory looks at
- The look for security over anything else
- Is careless and Fraudless
Toyotism of 80s
- The main goal that
- Automatic control as possible
- Time is always important
- Teamwork with everyone
- Management under stress
The results
- Time to adjust is impossible causing a reduction in relationships among their employees causing massive destruction in team work, all while the individuals feel isolated
Workplace laws
- Canada defines actions that will cause harm physically from mental stand point
- The republic of Korea will allow management to step in if there is an issue
- Mexico will see violence acts that impact workers health
- Ireland put laws of harassment at the work
The law covers
- Managers for doing wrongs to a worker
- Works harming the manager
- Worker to worker damage
- Costumer attacking worker
Workplace economic standings
- Work safety impacts workers safety while
- Having obligation to protect works
Business ethics
- A business with non violence promotes the company
- Any accidents result in finical loss and revenue
- Having good business
- Lure good works
- Loyal clients
- Market value
5 Factors of an economic work
- Have diligence
- Make sure of a secure work place with no issue
- Have output of work to produce
- Hire all talented workers
Ways To Handle Harassment
- Review current partnership
- Identify all risk
- Create a good plan
Harassing warning
- A lot do not report harassment
- Many do not act until something happens
- Violence happens by not accepting the issue
There are a few signals
- Employees always switch up
- Violent acts are now the new common
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
Explore theoretical perspectives on workplace violence, including physical, psychological, and organizational dimensions. Examine strategies for mitigating violence and adapting frameworks for remote work. Address microaggressions and systemic inequities to foster safe work environments.