Whatever Happened to Justice Ch 37

The belief that all members of a group are responsible for the actions of a few, even if they were not involved or opposed to those actions.

The tendency for a nation to expand its territory or influence, often leading to conflict with other nations.

A political leader who uses deception and manipulation to instigate war, often by portraying it as beneficial to the nation's interests.

The idea that it is acceptable to choose a less harmful option, even if that option is still morally questionable.

The act of forcibly taking possession of another nation's property, often as a consequence of war.

The severe weakening of a nation's economy, often due to war or economic policies that cause widespread poverty.

The use of threats, intimidation, or violence to suppress dissent or opposition within a nation.

The act of starting or provoking a war, directly or indirectly, often through political manipulation or military aggression.

A historical code of honor for soldiers that focused on protecting non-combatants and upholding ethical conduct.

The practice of killing innocent civilians during war, often referred to as collateral damage.

The idea that the deliberate killing of an innocent person is morally wrong, even in the context of war.

A system where the majority's decision holds power, sometimes leading to disregard for individual rights and moral considerations.

The use of advanced technology like laser-guided bombs combined with a lack of ethical consideration for civilian lives.

The transition from a time when wars primarily involved soldiers to an era where civilians are frequent targets.

The ethical principle that the killing of innocent people in war is morally unacceptable, regardless of their nationality or involvement.