Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is a key ethical expectation of valuers to maintain their professional status?
Which of the following actions would be considered improper conduct for a valuer?
What must a valuer provide to be accepted as an expert witness in court?
Which principle should a valuer NOT follow according to the code of professional conduct?
Signup and view all the answers
What constitutes improper self-promotional advertising for a valuer?
Signup and view all the answers
Why is consistency in valuations important for valuers?
Signup and view all the answers
What should a valuer do promptly when there is a change in their personal circumstances?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following actions signifies an ethical breach by a valuer?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the primary purpose of cross-examination in legal proceedings involving valuers?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following is NOT a suggestion for giving evidence in court?
Signup and view all the answers
In which case was the importance of logical deductions in valuations highlighted?
Signup and view all the answers
What criteria must hearsay evidence meet in legal proceedings to be considered admissible?
Signup and view all the answers
Under what circumstance can a valuer be found guilty of improper conduct?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the role of re-examination in the court proceedings involving valuers?
Signup and view all the answers
What should valuers avoid during cross-examination?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following describes a condition under which a valuer can be suspended?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
The Legal Relationship Between the Valuer and the Instructing Party
- Valuers are expected to uphold ethical standards and be competent in providing valuation services.
Code of Professional Conduct
- Follow professional conduct rules even when valuing properties outside their home country
- Disclose any pecuniary interests in properties they value
- Ensure their name appears on all accounts related to property valuation.
- Notify the Council of any changes in address or employment promptly.
Improper Conduct
- Performing work reserved for valuers contingent on the outcome of a dispute or litigation.
Conduct Constituting Improper Conduct
- Undertaking valuations without proper qualification.
- Self-promotional advertising that is misleading or derogatory.
- Maliciously harming another valuer's reputation or business.
- Criticizing or disparaging another valuer's work without legal basis.
- Undermining another valuer's engagement without consent.
- Sharing fees improperly.
- Accepting remuneration from unauthorized parties.
- Disclosing confidential information without consent.
- Soliciting professional employment through commissions.
The Valuer as an Expert Witness
- Valuers may give expert evidence in court to explain valuations or provide opinions on property value.
- Must disclose qualifications and experience to be accepted as an expert.
- Must have full and precise instructions from the client, usually through legal representatives.
Evidence Format
- Ensure valuations are logical and based on factual data.
- Consistency in valuations is critical; previous valuations may need to be produced.
- Must understand legal requirements for valuations, especially in expropriation cases.
Legal Process Involvement
- Valuers assist legal advisers in case preparation and may advise during cross-examinations.
- A comprehensive, motivated valuation report is essential.
- Evidence must be relevant and admissible according to legal standards.
Court Procedures
- Evidence is presented in a structured format: evidence in chief, cross-examination, and re-examination.
- Cross-examination is critical and aims to discredit the valuer’s evidence.
Suggestions for Giving Evidence
- Answer questions directly to the judge, not opposing counsel.
- Maintain courtesy and respect in court.
- Be honest; do not guess or speculate.
- Prepare thoroughly to anticipate questions.
- Knowledge of legal aspects of valuation is essential for credibility.
Re-examination
- Conducted by the valuer's legal team to clarify previous evidence.
- Hearsay evidence is generally inadmissible unless it meets specific criteria.
Important Case References
- Union Government v Jackson (1956): Importance of logical deductions in valuations.
- Davey v Minister of Agriculture (1979): Critique of excessive evidence and the need for relevance.
- Lornadown Investments v Minister van Landbou (1977): Hearsay evidence related to buyer/seller considerations.
- Southern Transvaal Buildings v Administrator Transvaal (1979): Limitations on using another valuer's conclusions.
Conclusion
- Valuers must navigate a complex legal landscape while maintaining high ethical standards and professionalism.
- Their role as expert witnesses requires thorough preparation, an understanding of legal principles, and the ability to provide credible, fact-based evidence in court.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Explore the essential ethical standards and conduct codes that valuers must adhere to within their profession. The quiz covers the legal relationship between valuers and instructing parties, along with the implications of improper conduct. Test your knowledge of the rules governing valuation practices and professional integrity.