Utilitarianism and Crime

They must have intended for the harmful actions to occur

They must have done something wrong that affirms or encourages the harmful actions (correct)

There must be a direct causal link between their actions and the harm

They must have been physically present when the harm occurred

To define the scope of criminal law and protect legal interests (correct)

To promote restorative justice over punitive measures

To prioritize the protection of individual rights over societal interests

To ensure that all crimes are punished equally

The Doctrine of Legal Goods limits the scope of criminal law, while the harm principle expands it (correct)

The Doctrine of Legal Goods focuses on protecting societal interests, while the harm principle focuses on individual rights

There is no conceptual difference between the two

The Doctrine of Legal Goods is broader in scope than the harm principle

<p>Only if less intrusive means are insufficient for protection</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>To protect legal interests and ensure peaceful coexistence</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>The ultima ratio principle</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>The Doctrine of Legal Goods</p> Signup and view all the answers