Supreme Court Judgement on Same-Sex Marriages in India

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the main focus of the writ petitions filed by the two same-sex couples in the Supreme Court?

  • Challenging the constitutionality of the Special Marriage Act, 1954
  • Requesting recognition of foreign same-sex marriages in India
  • Seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriages in India (correct)
  • Advocating for amendments to the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Which acts were challenged along with the Special Marriage Act, 1954 in the petitions?

  • Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 and Anand Marriage Act, 1909
  • Indian Divorce Act, 1869 and Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936
  • Muslim Personal Law and Christian Marriage Act, 1872
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Foreign Marriage Act, 1969 (correct)

What rights did the petitioners argue were violated by the non-recognition of same-sex marriage?

  • Rights to property, freedom of religion, and privacy
  • Rights to education, freedom of assembly, and privacy
  • Rights to equality, freedom of expression, and dignity (correct)
  • Rights to healthcare, freedom of speech, and equality before law

How many judgments were delivered by the Supreme Court regarding the legal recognition of same-sex marriages?

<p>Four judgments (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the majority decision of the Supreme Court regarding legal recognition of same-sex marriages?

<p>3-2 (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Supreme Court ruled that there cannot be legal recognition for same-sex marriages

<p>3-2 majority</p> Signup and view all the answers

Supriyo Chakraborty and Abhay Dang

<p>first petition</p> Signup and view all the answers

Parth Phiroze Merhotra and Uday Raj Anand

<p>second petition</p> Signup and view all the answers

Non-recognition of same-sex marriage violates the rights to equality, freedom of expression and dignity

<p>petitioners' argument</p> Signup and view all the answers

Section 4(c) of th

<p>blank</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Supreme Court ruled that there cannot be legal recognition for ______ marriages

<p>same-sex</p> Signup and view all the answers

The first petition for legal recognition of same-sex marriages was filed by Supriyo Chakraborty and ______

<p>Abhay Dang</p> Signup and view all the answers

The second petition was by Parth Phiroze Merhotra and ______ Raj Anand

<p>Uday</p> Signup and view all the answers

The petitions were centred around the constitutionality of the Special Marriage Act, ______

<p>1954</p> Signup and view all the answers

The challenged enactments include the Hindu Marriage Act, ______

<p>1955</p> Signup and view all the answers

And the Foreign Marriage Act, 1969

<p>1955</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards are hidden until you start studying

Study Notes

  • Two same-sex couples, Supriyo Chakraborty and Abhay Dang, and Parth Phiroze Merhotra and Uday Raj Anand, filed writ petitions in the Supreme Court.
  • The petitions challenged the constitutionality of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, along with the Hindu Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act, 1969.
  • The petitioners argued that the non-recognition of same-sex marriage violates their rights to equality, freedom of expression, and dignity.
  • The Supreme Court delivered a single judgment regarding the legal recognition of same-sex marriages.
  • The majority decision of the Supreme Court ruled that there cannot be legal recognition for same-sex marriages.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser