Traditional vs Rogerian Argument Flashcards

Basic Strategy

• Traditional Argument emphasizes stating a claim with supporting reasons and refuting opposing arguments.
• Rogerian Argument promotes mutual understanding by presenting the opponent's claim as valid before offering a counterpoint.

Ethos

• In Traditional Argument, the writer builds credibility by showing fair-mindedness, competence, and goodwill.
• Rogerian Argument enhances ethos by empathizing with the opponent, fostering a sense of shared character.

Logos

• Traditional Argument relies on logical reasoning to establish claims and dismantle opposing viewpoints.
• Rogerian Argument analyzes the context in which both sides' positions may hold validity, focusing on explanation rather than confrontation.

Pathos

• Traditional Argument engages emotions through evocative language to reinforce the writer's stance.
• Rogerian Argument takes a calmer approach, using neutral language to diffuse emotional tensions on both sides.

Goal

• Traditional Argument aims to change the opponent's mind to achieve victory in the debate.
• Rogerian Argument strives for collaboration, encouraging both sides to consider change and work towards beneficial solutions.

Use of Argument Techniques

• Traditional Argument employs established frameworks like the Toulmin Model, utilizing claims of fact, value, and policy backed by various forms of evidence.
• Rogerian Argument rejects rigid structures, opting for connection through empathy to avoid perceived threats.

Explore the key differences between Traditional and Rogerian arguments with these flashcards. Understand various terms like Basic Strategy and Ethos, and learn how each argument style approaches claims and rebuttals.