Traditional vs Rogerian Argument Flashcards

Questions and Answers

What is a basic strategy of a traditional argument?

Using descriptive language

Understanding the opponent's claim

Creating cooperation

Establishing the claim and proving it (correct)

What does ethos refer to in the context of traditional arguments?

Establishing the writer's character and credibility (correct)

Changing the opponent's mind

The use of logic to appeal to reason

Evoking emotions through language

In a Rogerian argument, how does the writer use logos?

By establishing claims with reason

By appealing to emotions

By changing the opponent's mind

By analyzing the conditions for both sides' validity (correct)

What is the goal of a traditional argument?

To change the opponent's mind Signup and view all the answers

What approach does a writer take in a Rogerian argument regarding argument techniques?

Focuses on connecting empathetically Signup and view all the answers

What is represented by the term 'pathos' in traditional arguments?

Arousing emotion through evocative language Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Basic Strategy

Traditional Argument emphasizes stating a claim with supporting reasons and refuting opposing arguments.
Rogerian Argument promotes mutual understanding by presenting the opponent's claim as valid before offering a counterpoint.

Ethos

In Traditional Argument, the writer builds credibility by showing fair-mindedness, competence, and goodwill.
Rogerian Argument enhances ethos by empathizing with the opponent, fostering a sense of shared character.

Logos

Traditional Argument relies on logical reasoning to establish claims and dismantle opposing viewpoints.
Rogerian Argument analyzes the context in which both sides' positions may hold validity, focusing on explanation rather than confrontation.

Pathos

Traditional Argument engages emotions through evocative language to reinforce the writer's stance.
Rogerian Argument takes a calmer approach, using neutral language to diffuse emotional tensions on both sides.

Goal

Traditional Argument aims to change the opponent's mind to achieve victory in the debate.
Rogerian Argument strives for collaboration, encouraging both sides to consider change and work towards beneficial solutions.

Use of Argument Techniques

Traditional Argument employs established frameworks like the Toulmin Model, utilizing claims of fact, value, and policy backed by various forms of evidence.
Rogerian Argument rejects rigid structures, opting for connection through empathy to avoid perceived threats.

Description

Explore the key differences between Traditional and Rogerian arguments with these flashcards. Understand various terms like Basic Strategy and Ethos, and learn how each argument style approaches claims and rebuttals.