Tort Law Concepts and Cases
180 Questions
1 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What are the four factors needed to establish a prima facie case of negligence?

Duty, Breach, Causation, and Damages.

Explain the concept of 'Duty' in tort law.

Duty refers to the obligation to act with reasonable care for the benefit of others, which typically does not exist unless a risk of harm is created.

What does the Learned-Hand Formula relate to in the context of tort law?

The Learned-Hand Formula is used to determine whether a breach of duty occurred by balancing the burden of taking precautions against the probability and severity of harm.

In tort law, what is the significance of the case Yania v. Bigan?

<p>Yania v. Bigan illustrates that a person is only required to help another in danger if they created the risk of harm to that person.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Define 'Causation' in the context of a negligence claim.

<p>Causation includes both actual cause, determined by the But-For Test, and proximate cause, which involves foreseeability.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is 'Res Ipsa Loquitur' and how is it applied in negligence cases?

<p>Res Ipsa Loquitur is a doctrine that allows the presumption of negligence when the accident is of a kind that does not typically occur without negligence.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does 'Comparative Fault' mean in tort law?

<p>Comparative Fault refers to a legal doctrine that allocates fault among parties, allowing for damage awards to be reduced based on the plaintiff's own negligence.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the case Rowland v. Christian change the traditional view of landowner liability?

<p>Rowland v. Christian overruled the idea that a landowner's duty is based on the status of the visitor, establishing that a duty exists to act reasonably to prevent injury to all individuals regardless of their status.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are punitive damages designed to achieve?

<p>Punitive damages are designed to punish reprehensible conduct and deter similar future misconduct.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what type of cases are punitive damages not available?

<p>Punitive damages are not available in strict liability or strict products liability cases.</p> Signup and view all the answers

List two examples of economic damages.

<p>Economic damages include medical expenses and lost wages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is remittitur?

<p>Remittitur is a legal doctrine allowing a judge to lower an award amount deemed excessive by the jury.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does additur differ from remittitur?

<p>Additur allows a judge to raise an award amount that the jury assigned as too low.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was held in the case of Calva-Cerqueira v. United States?

<p>The case held that the primary purpose of compensatory damages in personal injury cases is to make the plaintiff whole.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What did the majority approach determine about loss of enjoyment in McDougald v. Garber?

<p>The majority approach held that loss of enjoyment of life is included as part of pain and suffering.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In wrongful death actions, what can surviving relatives recover for?

<p>Surviving relatives can recover damages for the loss of a decedent’s society, comfort, care, and protection.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why are punitive damages not permitted in negligence cases?

<p>In negligence cases, punitive damages are not permitted because they require a higher degree of culpability.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the difference between contributory negligence and comparative fault.

<p>Contributory negligence bars recovery if the plaintiff is at fault, while comparative fault allows recovery reduced by the plaintiff's share of fault.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the impact of pure comparative fault on a plaintiff's recovery?

<p>Under pure comparative fault, a plaintiff can recover damages unless they are 100% at fault for the accident.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What happens under Modified A comparative fault jurisdiction when a plaintiff is 50% at fault?

<p>Under Modified A jurisdiction, a plaintiff who is 50% at fault can still recover damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what situations can punitive damages be claimed?

<p>Punitive damages can be claimed in intentional tort claims, gross negligence claims, and some privacy tort claims.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a plaintiff prove to establish actual cause under the but-for test?

<p>The plaintiff must prove that but-for the defendant’s conduct, the injury would not have occurred.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In cases with multiple defendants, which test is used to determine actual cause?

<p>The Substantial Factor Test is used when multiple forces combine to cause the plaintiff's harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how reasonable inference can prove actual cause in tort cases.

<p>Actual cause can be established by demonstrating a reasonable inference of connection between the defendant's conduct and the plaintiff's harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the doctrine of alternative liability entail?

<p>Alternative liability holds multiple tortfeasors jointly liable if it’s impossible to determine which one caused the plaintiff's injuries.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the Single-Indivisible Injury Rule?

<p>It states that if a plaintiff is harmed by multiple tortfeasors almost simultaneously, those defendants must prove damages can be apportioned.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Define market share liability and its implications in tort law.

<p>Market share liability holds manufacturers liable in proportion to their market share for identical products that caused harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How do courts determine proximate cause in a negligence case?

<p>Courts assess whether the defendant's actions created a foreseeable risk of harm to the plaintiff.</p> Signup and view all the answers

List the three parts of the proximate cause test as established in McClenahan v. Cooley.

<ol> <li>Proven actual cause, 2) Could a reasonably prudent person have foreseen harm, 3) Is there a public policy cutting off liability?</li> </ol> Signup and view all the answers

What are compensatory damages and their purpose?

<p>Compensatory damages are awarded to cover losses and make the injured party whole again after a tort.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What distinguishes punitive damages from compensatory damages?

<p>Punitive damages are awarded to punish the wrongdoer and deter illegal behavior, unlike compensatory damages which only aim to make the victim whole.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the concept of loss of consortium as a type of damage.

<p>Loss of consortium refers to the loss of companionship and support resulting from an injury to a loved one.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary objective of tort law as described in the content?

<p>The primary objective of tort law is to compensate victims while promoting safe conduct and fair liability.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How do tort law policies affect liability in negligence cases?

<p>Tort law policies aim to fairly compensate victims, deter negligent behavior, and ensure efficient legal processes.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What principle does the case Palgraf v. Long Island RR Co. illustrate regarding proximate cause?

<p>It illustrates that defendants owe a duty of care only to those in a zone of reasonably foreseeable harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are non-economic damages, and can you give examples?

<p>Non-economic damages refer to compensation for intangible losses, such as emotional distress and pain and suffering.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary goal of compensatory damages in court?

<p>The primary goal of compensatory damages is to make the injured party whole again, reflecting the loss they suffered.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under what circumstances are punitive damages awarded?

<p>Punitive damages are awarded when a defendant's conduct demonstrates a higher degree of culpability, such as recklessness or intentional harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Can punitive damages be covered by insurance?

<p>No, punitive damages cannot be paid by insurance.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is contributory negligence and its impact on a plaintiff's ability to recover damages?

<p>Contributory negligence is a legal doctrine that prevents a plaintiff from recovering damages if they are found to be at fault for their injuries.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does comparative fault differ from contributory negligence?

<p>Comparative fault allows a plaintiff to recover damages proportionate to their level of responsibility, without complete barring based on fault.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes a complete privilege under public necessity?

<p>A complete privilege under public necessity means that a defendant can damage or destroy property without liability if acting to prevent imminent public harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a defendant demonstrate to claim public necessity as a defense?

<p>The defendant must show that their actions were necessary to avert serious harm to the public and that the public interest was involved.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What types of claims can seek both punitive and compensatory damages?

<p>Gross negligence claims and intentional tort claims can seek both punitive and compensatory damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes a public nuisance as per Restatement 2d § 821(B)?

<p>A public nuisance is an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public, affecting public health, safety, peace, comfort, or convenience.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a plaintiff demonstrate to prove a private nuisance claim?

<p>A plaintiff must show substantial and unreasonable interference with their use and enjoyment of property.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why can strict liability cases only seek compensatory damages?

<p>Strict liability cases can only seek compensatory damages because they do not involve a finding of fault beyond the act itself.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the difference between actual cause and proximate cause in nuisance cases.

<p>Actual cause relates to the gravity of harm and utility of conduct; proximate cause involves foreseeability and the scope of liability.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what situation is punitive damages not permitted?

<p>Punitive damages are not permitted in negligence cases.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under what conditions can damages be recovered for a public nuisance?

<p>Damages can be recovered if the plaintiff suffered harm different from the general public's harm related to the common right interfered with.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the difference between pure comparative fault and modified comparative fault?

<p>Pure comparative fault allows recovery regardless of the percentage of fault, while modified comparative fault limits recovery if the plaintiff exceeds 50% or 50.1% fault, depending on the jurisdiction.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What types of damages can be sought in nuisance cases?

<p>Compensatory and punitive damages can be sought in nuisance cases.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What types of damages can a trespass to land claim seek?

<p>A trespass to land claim can seek compensatory, punitive, and nominal damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the 'Utility of the Conduct' test in nuisance claims?

<p>It evaluates whether the benefits of the actor's conduct outweigh the harm caused to the plaintiff.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Define what is meant by 'substantial evidence test' in the context of nuisance.

<p>The substantial evidence test requires proof that the claimed interference is significant enough to warrant legal remedy.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What role does government play in addressing public nuisances?

<p>The government is responsible for bringing action against public nuisances to protect community rights.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does private necessity allow a person to do regarding someone else's property?

<p>A person is privileged to enter or remain on another's land to prevent serious harm, but must compensate for any damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does self-defense differ from other types of defenses in intentional torts?

<p>Self-defense allows the use of force likely to cause death or serious injury if there is a reasonable belief of imminent harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the standard for determining intent in intentional torts?

<p>Intent can be established if the tortfeasor acts with the purpose to bring about a certain result or with substantial certainty that a result will occur.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the concept of transferred intent in tort law.

<p>Transferred intent holds a tortfeasor liable for harming an unintended victim if they intended to harm someone else.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes 'assault' according to Restatement § 21?

<p>Assault is an intentional act that creates a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe the distinction between direct and indirect contact in battery.

<p>Direct contact is physical interaction without consent, while indirect contact involves causing harm through another object or force.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the requirements for a claim of false imprisonment?

<p>False imprisonment requires intentional confinement or restraint of a person who is aware of their confinement.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of tort law, what are compensatory damages?

<p>Compensatory damages are awarded to cover actual losses suffered by the plaintiff due to the tortious act.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the standard for determining whether a contact is harmful or offensive in a battery case?

<p>A contact is deemed harmful if it causes physical injury, and offensive if it offends a reasonable person's sense of dignity.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Can punitive damages be sought in cases of private necessity?

<p>No, the necessity doctrine only allows for compensatory damages, not punitive damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the imminent nature of a threat relate to the concept of assault?

<p>Imminent threats must be likely to occur soon, creating reasonable apprehension of contact for a valid assault claim.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What role does consent play in the defense against tort claims?

<p>Consent can serve as an affirmative defense, indicating the plaintiff agreed to the contact or situation causing the harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does intent refer to in the context of battery under Restatement § 13?

<p>In battery, intent refers to acting with a desired purpose to inflict harm or having knowledge that harm is likely to result.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is meant by 'reasonable apprehension' in relation to assault claims?

<p>Reasonable apprehension is the victim's belief that harmful or offensive contact is imminent, even without fear.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of Christian, what was the primary issue concerning landowner liability?

<p>The issue was whether Christian acted as a reasonable landowner by failing to warn her guests about the broken faucet.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the three statuses of people on another's land as established in American Industries Life Insurance Co v. Ruvalcaba?

<p>The three statuses are invitee, licensee, and trespasser.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine and when does it impose liability on landowners?

<p>It imposes liability when dangerous conditions attract child trespassers and cause harm that the landowner knows about.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Delta Tau Delta v. Johnson, what tests are used to determine a landowner's duty to protect invitees?

<p>The Specific Harm Test, Prior Similar Incidents Test, Totality of the Circumstances Test, and the Balancing Test.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What principle was established in Farwell v. Keaton regarding aiding someone in peril?

<p>If a person attempts to aid someone in peril, a duty arises to exercise reasonable care in rendering that aid.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What liability did the company face in MacPherson v. Buick, and why?

<p>The company was liable for selling a car with a defective wheel because they had a duty to ensure safety for all users, not just the purchaser.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Tarasoff Doctrine require from therapists who learn about potential harm to third parties?

<p>Therapists have a duty to take reasonable precautions to warn potential victims of the danger.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How was breach of duty determined in Vaughn v. Menlove?

<p>It was determined by Menlove's failure to heed Vaughan's warning about the fire risk from his hay stack.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the Learned Hand Formula and how does it assess negligence liability?

<p>The formula states that a breach occurs if the burden of taking precautions is less than the probability of injury multiplied by the potential harm, represented as B &lt; PL.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In TJ Hooper, what was the key factor in determining breach of duty concerning boat safety equipment?

<p>Breach can be proved by the argument that the defendant should have implemented newer safety technologies even if it was not customary at the time.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the outcome of the case Trimarco v. Klein regarding the glass shower door?

<p>The case highlighted that failure to adopt new safety measures, along with traditional industry practices, could lead to liability for injuries.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What factors does the Balancing Test consider in assessing a landowner's duty of care?

<p>It balances the predictability of harm against the burden of preventing that harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In regards to landowner liability, how does a person's status as a licensee affect the duties owed to them?

<p>Landowners must warn licensees of conditions that they know could cause harm, similar to the duties owed to invitees.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the term 'unreasonable risk' refer to in the context of the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine?

<p>It refers to a condition on the land that poses a significant danger of death or serious injury to children.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes a public necessity under the Necessity Doctrine?

<p>A public necessity involves actions taken to prevent imminent public disaster, allowing for the destruction of property without liability for damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe the difference between public necessity and private necessity.

<p>Public necessity is a complete privilege that protects defendants from liability for property damage, while private necessity is an incomplete privilege that allows for recovery of damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the three requirements a defendant must meet to invoke public necessity?

<p>The defendant must show that the action was taken for public interests, there was a reasonable belief it was necessary, and the action was a reasonable response to the need.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Necessity Doctrine primarily serve as a defense against?

<p>The Necessity Doctrine serves as a defense against negligence, gross negligence, intentional torts, and strict liability.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How is consent defined in relation to intentional harm claims?

<p>Consent is a defense in such claims and implies voluntary exposure to the defendant’s offensive contact.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is 'misuse' in terms of products liability?

<p>Misuse occurs when a plaintiff alters or modifies a product, which can absolve the manufacturer of liability.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the first part of the Necessity Doctrine test?

<p>The defendant must have acted under a reasonable belief that there was a danger of imminent physical injury.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is meant by 'assumption of risk'?

<p>Assumption of risk means that a person who consents to an activity acknowledges the risks involved and cannot later claim for injuries resulting from those risks.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain what constitutes a breach of duty in a negligence claim.

<p>A breach of duty occurs when a defendant fails to meet the standard of care expected in their actions, which may be established by the Learned-Hand Formula or industry standards.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of the 'But-For' test in causation?

<p>The 'But-For' test determines whether the harm would have occurred but for the defendant's actions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does proximate cause differ from actual cause?

<p>Proximate cause is concerned with the foreseeability of risk and whether the harm is a natural consequence of the defendant's actions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of compensatory damages in tort law?

<p>Compensatory damages aim to make the injured party whole by covering the losses incurred due to the defendant's wrongful conduct.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the relevance of the Tarasoff Doctrine in establishing a duty of care?

<p>The Tarasoff Doctrine creates a duty for psychotherapists to warn identifiable victims of threats made by their patients.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What duty does a landowner owe to an invitee according to the Land-Owner / Occupier Trichotomy?

<p>A landowner owes invitees a duty to inspect for potential harm and to warn them of known hazardous conditions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Define the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine.

<p>The Attractive Nuisance Doctrine applies when children are lured onto a property by artificial conditions that pose an unreasonable risk of harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the Specific Harm Test in relation to a landowner's duty to protect invitees?

<p>The Specific Harm Test states that a landowner owes no duty to protect invitees unless they knew or should have known of specific harmful incidents occurring.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of FARWELL v. KEATON, what duty arises when a person volunteers to aid someone in peril?

<p>If a person volunteers to assist someone in peril, they have a duty to exercise reasonable care while providing that aid.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the essence of the Tarasoff Doctrine?

<p>The Tarasoff Doctrine requires therapists to take reasonable precautions to warn potential victims if they learn about a patient's intent to cause harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the Learned-Hand Formula in negligence cases.

<p>The Learned-Hand Formula weighs whether the burden of taking precautions (B) is less than the probability of harm (P) multiplied by the likely harm (L).</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes Negligence Per Se?

<p>Negligence Per Se occurs when a defendant is found liable for negligence for violating a safety law or regulation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the Res Ipsa Loquitur doctrine apply to negligence cases?

<p>Res Ipsa Loquitur allows for an inference of negligence based on the circumstances of an accident occurring, indicating a breach of duty.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Robinso n v. Lindsay, how are children held in relation to adult risks?

<p>Children performing adult-level dangerous activities are held to the same standards of care as adults, particularly if they are over the age of 7.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What factor must be considered under the Totality of the Circumstances Test?

<p>The Totality of the Circumstances Test considers all relevant factors surrounding an incident to determine the landowner's duty.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the Broke Industry Custom in negligence claims?

<p>Broke Industry Custom signifies that a defendant deviated from established industry practices, which can constitute a breach of duty.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What duty does a manufacturer owe concerning unsafe products?

<p>A manufacturer has a duty of care to ensure that products are safe for foreseeable users, not just the initial purchaser.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What impact does the utility versus risk analysis have on landowners under the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine?

<p>Landowners must weigh the utility of maintaining an attractive nuisance against the risks it poses to children and take reasonable steps to mitigate those risks.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what scenario might the Prior Similar Incidents Test apply?

<p>The Prior Similar Incidents Test may apply if there have been previous similar incidents in the area, suggesting that the landowner should have foreseen potential harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Doctrine of Necessity allow a person to do under Rest. 2d § 339?

<p>It allows a person to enter or remain on another's land if it is necessary to prevent serious harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

List the four parts of the Clohessy v. Bachelor test for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress.

<ol> <li>Closely related to the victim, 2. Contemporaneous sensory perception, 3. Victim has substantial injuries, 4. Bystander suffers serious emotional distress.</li> </ol> Signup and view all the answers

What is required to establish strict liability in tort cases?

<p>A defendant must engage in activities that are inherently dangerous and potentially harm-producing.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Identify two types of activities that qualify for strict liability.

<p>Wild animals and abnormally dangerous activities.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are compensatory damages in strict liability cases?

<p>Compensatory damages are damages awarded to compensate for economic and noneconomic losses.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the role of foreseeability in establishing proximate cause.

<p>Foreseeability determines whether the harm that occurred was a predictable result of the defendant's actions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is meant by 'high probability of harm' in the context of an abnormally dangerous activity?

<p>It refers to the likelihood that an activity will cause harm if not properly managed.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of Rest. 2d § 520 in tort law?

<p>It sets criteria for identifying activities as abnormally dangerous, leading to strict liability.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe the Assumption of Risk as an affirmative defense in tort law.

<p>Assumption of Risk occurs when a plaintiff knowingly engages in an activity involving risk.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What criteria must be met for a wild animal owner to be held strictly liable for harm caused?

<p>The harm must result from a dangerous propensity characteristic of that animal species.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which test is used to determine actual cause in tort cases?

<p>The But-For Test or Substantial Factor Test is used.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the term 'noneconomic damages' refer to?

<p>Noneconomic damages refer to compensation for non-monetary losses, such as pain and suffering.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary limitation regarding the types of damages sought in strict liability cases?

<p>Strict liability cases can only seek compensatory damages, not punitive damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the six factors considered to determine if an activity is abnormally dangerous?

<ol> <li>High probability of harm, 2. Likelihood of severe harm, 3. Inability to eliminate risk, 4. Not common usage, 5. Inappropriate location, 6. Danger outweighs community value.</li> </ol> Signup and view all the answers

What was the holding in the case of Rylands v. Fletcher regarding liability?

<p>A person is strictly liable for harm caused by the escape of something dangerous brought onto their land.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a plaintiff show to establish that a product is defectively designed?

<p>A plaintiff must show that the product does not meet reasonable customer expectations and that its design was a substantial factor in causing harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes an inadequate warning defect in product liability cases?

<p>An inadequate warning defect occurs when a manufacturer fails to clearly warn consumers about a product's potential dangers.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval, why was the plaintiff unable to recover damages?

<p>The plaintiff could not recover damages because the economic harm was solely to the product itself and not a legally protected interest.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a manufacturer ensure regarding its products in terms of consumer awareness?

<p>A manufacturer must ensure that the end user is adequately informed about the product's dangers.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Restatement (Second) § 158 state about trespass to land?

<p>It states that a person can be liable for trespassing if they intentionally enter another's land or remain there without permission.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the affirmative defenses in tort law?

<p>Affirmative defenses can limit or eliminate a defendant's liability by showing that the plaintiff shares fault or assumed risk.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of Creel v. Crim, who was ultimately found liable for the trespass?

<p>Creel was found liable for trespassing as he acted on incorrect information about property ownership.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the case Katko v. Briney relate to self-defense and property protection?

<p>It established that deadly force cannot be used to protect property unless there is a concurrent threat to personal safety.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What key criteria are considered when evaluating the inadequacy of a product warning?

<p>The criteria include explicitness, comprehensibility, clarity, conspicuousness, and means used to warn.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which test is preferred in design defect cases in product liability law?

<p>The Risk-Utility Test is preferred over the Consumer Expectations Test.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are some types of damages that can be sought in tort law?

<p>Compensatory, punitive, and nominal damages can be sought in tort law cases.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is required to prove trespass to land according to Stukes v. Bachmeyer?

<p>The plaintiff must prove ownership of the land, intentional entry by the defendant, and resultant damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is negligence not required to prove trespass to land?

<p>Trespass is considered an intentional tort where liability arises solely from the act of entering the land.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does Res Ipsa Loquitur imply in negligence cases?

<p>Res Ipsa Loquitur implies that the very occurrence of an accident suggests negligence, as the harm would not have occurred without a breach of duty.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the different forms of confinement in the context of false imprisonment?

<p>Forms of confinement include physical barriers, threats of force, omissions where there is a legal duty to act, or improper assertion of legal authority.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of Ferrell v. Baxter, what key legal concept was established regarding safety laws?

<p>Ferrell v. Baxter established the principle of negligence per se, where violating a safety law automatically constitutes negligence.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What test determines actual causation in negligence, as illustrated in Sowles v. Moore?

<p>The But-For test is used, which states that but for the defendant's actions, the plaintiff's injuries would not have occurred.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes 'outrageous conduct' in the context of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)?

<p>Outrageous conduct is behavior that is beyond the bounds of decency, seen as intolerable in a civilized community.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the Substantial Factor Test work in evaluating causation in Corey v. Havener?

<p>The Substantial Factor Test evaluates whether the defendant's actions significantly contributed to the plaintiff's injuries without needing to dissect exact causes.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the 'Clohessy v. Bachelor' test aimed at evaluating?

<p>The test evaluates if a bystander can recover for IIED when closely related to the injury victim, perceiving the event contemporaneously, and facing severe emotional distress.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How do you differentiate between 'trespass to chattels' and 'conversion'?

<p>Trespass to chattels involves intent to touch property, whereas conversion involves the intention to exercise control over the property, seriously interfering with another's right to it.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was determined regarding causation in Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of Buffalo?

<p>Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of Buffalo determined that a plaintiff must show a causal connection between their injuries and the defendant's negligence, which was clear in this case.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the concept of Alternative Liability as established in Summers v. Tice?

<p>Alternative Liability allows for multiple defendants to be held jointly liable when it's impossible to determine which one caused the plaintiff's injury.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of the 'But-For Test' in establishing actual cause?

<p>The But-For Test determines if the plaintiff would not have been harmed but for the defendant's actions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe the Single-Indivisible Injury Rule from Fugere v. Pierce.

<p>The Single-Indivisible Injury Rule states that when a plaintiff is harmed by multiple defendants, those defendants must prove that damages can be apportioned.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What types of damages can be sought in cases of intentional torts?

<p>Victims can seek both punitive and compensatory damages, including economic and non-economic damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is 'express consent' and how does it differ from 'implied consent'?

<p>Express consent is explicitly given, either verbally or in writing, while implied consent is inferred from actions or circumstances.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is Market Share Liability, as defined in Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co?

<p>Market Share Liability holds all manufacturers of a harmful product liable in proportion to their market share at the time of the plaintiff's injury.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does Proximate Cause assess in negligence cases?

<p>Proximate Cause assesses whether the defendant's actions included the general type of harm suffered by the plaintiff and if it was a foreseeable outcome.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes 'reasonable force' in self-defense claims?

<p>Reasonable force in self-defense refers to the minimum amount of force necessary to prevent imminent unlawful harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the three-part Proximate Cause Test from McClenahan v. Cooley.

<p>The three-part test requires proving actual cause, whether a reasonable person could foresee the harm, and if public policy cuts off liability to the defendant.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under what conditions can necessity serve as a defense in tort actions?

<p>Necessity serves as a defense if the defendant reasonably believes their actions are necessary to prevent an immediate emergency.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of having the defendant's intent classified as 'substantial certainty' in IIED cases?

<p>Intent classified as 'substantial certainty' signifies that the defendant had knowledge that their actions would almost certainly cause severe emotional distress.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the three kinds of damages recognized in tort law?

<p>The three types of damages are wrongful death, personal injury, and property damage.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What role does 'actual damages' play in determining trespass to chattels?

<p>Actual damages assess whether the property was impaired in condition, quality, or value due to interference.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What types of losses are considered economic damages in tort cases?

<p>Economic damages include medical expenses, lost wages, and other quantifiable financial losses.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must plaintiffs show to succeed with the substantial factor test in tort claims?

<p>Plaintiffs must demonstrate that the defendant's actions had a significant role in contributing to their harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the concept of Loss of Consortium relate to personal injury cases?

<p>Loss of Consortium refers to the loss of companionship and benefits of a relationship due to a tortfeasor's actions, allowing loved ones to claim damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the significant outcome of the McClenahan v. Cooley case concerning negligence?

<p>McClenahan v. Cooley affirmed that negligent acts that lead to injuries don't lose their causal connection even if intervening events occur, if they are foreseeable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How can the defendant's good or bad faith affect a claim of conversion?

<p>The defendant's good or bad faith is considered regarding the extent and duration of interference with the property.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What defines a wild animal according to Rest. 2d § 506?

<p>A wild animal is one that is not by custom devoted to the service of mankind at the time and place it is kept.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under what circumstances can a possessor of a domestic animal be held liable according to Rest. 2d § 509?

<p>A possessor is liable if they know or have reason to know that the domestic animal has dangerous propensities abnormal to its class.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the basic elements necessary to establish strict products liability?

<p>The basic elements are establishing the manufacturer or seller, proving defectiveness, causation, and damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a manufacturing defect?

<p>A manufacturing defect occurs when a product departs from its intended design during production.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the consumer expectation test help in establishing design defects?

<p>The consumer expectation test evaluates whether a product is safe as an ordinary consumer would expect it to be.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the case Welge v. Planters in strict products liability?

<p>It established that a seller is responsible for injuries caused by a defective product, regardless of when or how the defect occurred.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Open and Obvious Doctrine entail regarding product liability?

<p>The doctrine states that if a risk is open and obvious with an adult product, it does not require childproofing.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the risk-utility test used for in product liability cases?

<p>The risk-utility test balances the risks of a product against its utility to determine if it is defectively designed.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., what principle of liability was established?

<p>The case established that a manufacturer incurs absolute liability for defects in products placed on the market for use without inspection.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are compensatory damages, and how do they relate to strict products liability?

<p>Compensatory damages are intended to reimburse the injured party for actual losses incurred due to a defective product.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does Rest. 2d § 402A state regarding the seller's liability?

<p>It states that a seller is liable for injuries caused by a product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to users, regardless of care taken.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What happens if a user modifies a product regarding product liability claims?

<p>Modification can serve as an affirmative defense for manufacturers, potentially limiting their liability.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a plaintiff demonstrate to prove a design defect under the risk-utility test?

<p>A plaintiff must show that a safer alternative exists and that the risks of the product outweigh its utility.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe one affirmative defense in strict products liability cases.

<p>One affirmative defense is comparative fault, where the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their injury.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Tort Law Fundamentals

  • Definition: A civil wrong (not a breach of contract) for which a court provides a remedy through damages.
  • Goals: Deterrence, compensation, economic/administrative efficiency, and fairness.
  • Categories:
    • Intentional Torts: Fault + intent.
    • Non-intentional Torts:
      • Negligence: Fault.
      • Strict Liability: No fault.
  • Types of Harm: Wrongful death, property damage, personal injury.

Negligence

  • Prima Facie Case: To prove negligence, a plaintiff must show, beyond a preponderance of the evidence, duty, breach, causation, and damages.

Duty

  • General: No duty to act for another's benefit. Duty is not based on foreseeability.
  • Exceptions:
    • Creating a Risk of Harm: A duty may arise if the defendant created the risky situation. Yania v. Bigan (injured person, not the creator).
    • Landowner/Occupier: Duty to act reasonably towards those on their land, considering their status.
      • Invitee: Occupier owes highest duty (potential pecuniary profit).
      • Licensee: Social guest.
      • Trespasser: Lowest duty. Rowland v. Christian redefined landowner/occupier duties, and American Industries Life Insurance Co v. Ruvalcaba covers the trichotomy.
    • Attractive Nuisance: Landowners may owe a higher duty to children lured onto their property by an attractive, dangerous condition.
    • Protection from Criminal Conduct: Landowners may owe a duty to protect invitees from foreseeable criminal activity (Delta Tau Delta v. Johnson). Different tests (specific harm, prior similar incidents).
    • Special Relationship: Duty exists between certain parties (e.g., employer-employee, common carrier).
    • Begin to Give Aid: If someone begins to assist, a duty arises to exercise reasonable care (Farwell v. Keaton).
    • Dangerous Products: Manufacturers have a duty to ensure things they design can be used safely.
    • Tarasoff Doctrine: Therapists have a duty to warn potential victims if a patient poses a credible threat of harm.

Breach

  • Standard of Care: The conduct of a reasonably prudent person (RPP).
  • Evidence of Breach:
    • Learned Hand Formula: Weighing the burden of precaution against the probability and severity of harm.
    • State of the Art: Failure to adopt readily available safety technology (e.g., the T.J. Hooper case).
    • Industry Custom: Deviation from accepted industry standards to create liability (e.g., Trimarchi).
    • Res Ipsa Loquitur: The thing speaks for itself; accident suggests negligence.
    • Negligence Per Se: Violating a safety statute is evidence of negligence (e.g., Ferrell).
    • Child Performing Adult Activities: Children performing adult activities are held to adult standards.
    • Circumstantial Evidence: Plaintiff's evidence linking defendant's actions to the harm (Clark v. Kmart).

Causation (Actual and Proximate Cause)

  • Actual Cause: 'But-For' test (plaintiff's injury would not have occurred without defendant's actions). Different tests for single vs multiple defendants.
  • Proximate Cause: Did the harm fall within the foreseeable zone of the risks created by the defendant's negligence and is a substantial factor? Palgraf v. Long Island Railroad

Damages

  • Compensatory: Money to restore plaintiff to pre-injury condition (medical bills, lost wages, pain & suffering).
  • Punitive: Punishment for egregious conduct (used in intentional torts; rare in negligence).

Affirmative Defenses

  • Contributory Negligence: Plaintiff's fault bars recovery (rare).
  • Comparative Fault: Comparing plaintiff's and defendant's fault to reduce damages; pure, modified.
    • Public Necessity: Complete defense for protecting public interest if defendant reasonably believed immediate action was required.
    • Private Necessity: Incomplete defense for actions necessary to protect private interests, with potential liability for damages.
  • Consent: Voluntary permission for harmful contact can be a defense.
  • Assumption of Risk: Voluntarily encountering known risk.
  • Misuse: If the plaintiff misused a product causing their own injury.

Strict Liability

  • Nature of Strict Liability: Liability for inherently dangerous activities (e.g., wild animals, abnormally dangerous activities).
  • Damages: Only compensatory damages. No punitive damages.
  • Defenses: Assumption of risk and comparative fault.

Strict Products Liability

  • Elements: Defective product, causation, damages.
    • Defect types: Manufacturing defect, design defect (consumer expectation, risk-utility test), inadequate warning.
  • Causation: Defendant's product caused plaintiff's injury.
  • Damages: Only compensatory damages. No punitive damages.
  • Defenses: Misuse, assumption of risk, comparative fault.

Trespass to Land (and Nuisance)

  • Trespass to Land: Protecting the right to exclude others. No need to prove causation.
  • Nuisance: Substantial interference with public or private use and enjoyment of land.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Description

Test your knowledge on key tort law principles, including negligence, duty, and significant cases that shape the understanding of liability and damages. This quiz covers various legal concepts such as causation, comparative fault, and unique rulings like Yania v. Bigan.

More Like This

Torts and Negligence Overview
24 questions
Tort Law Principles
129 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser