Top-Down Profiling in Criminal Psychology
8 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is one strength of the top-down approach in offender profiling?

  • It completely disregards the continuum of characteristics.
  • It relies solely on interviews with offenders.
  • It identifies a distinct organized category of offender. (correct)
  • It is universally applicable to all types of crimes.
  • Which research suggests the organized-disorganized typology may be better understood as a continuum?

  • Maurice Godwin (2002) (correct)
  • David Canter et al. (2004)
  • Walter Mischel (1968)
  • Tina Meketa (2017)
  • What was a significant limitation of the evidence base for FBI profiling?

  • The sample included diverse types of offenders.
  • The interviews were overly structured.
  • The sample size was limited and lacked standard protocols. (correct)
  • The sample size was too large.
  • What was the main finding of Tina Meketa's study regarding top-down profiling?

    <p>It led to an 85% increase in solved burglary cases. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What principle does the top-down approach primarily rely on?

    <p>Behavioural consistency across different situations. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which factor was NOT part of the analysis conducted by Canter et al. (2004)?

    <p>Criminal history of the offenders. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What argument do situationist psychologists like Walter Mischel make regarding behavior?

    <p>Behavior is significantly influenced by the situation. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of crimes have critics argued top-down profiling is primarily limited to?

    <p>Sexually-motivated crimes. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Research Support for Top-Down Profiling

    • Top-down profiling suggests a distinct organised category of offender.
    • David Canter et al. (2004) analyzed 100 US murders committed by different serial killers.
    • Smallest space analysis was used to assess the co-occurrence of 39 aspects of serial killings.
    • The analysis identified a subset of features in many serial killings that matched the FBI's organised offender typology.
    • This suggests validity for a key component of FBI typology.

    Counterpoint

    • Many studies suggest organised and disorganised types are not mutually exclusive.
    • There are various combinations of characteristics found at crime scenes.
    • Classifying killers into one category (organised or disorganised) might be difficult in reality.
    • A killer might demonstrate several contrasting characteristics, such as high intelligence and competence, but still have a spontaneous crime with the victim's body left at the scene.

    Wider Application

    • Top-down profiling can be applied to other crimes, such as burglary.
    • Some critics argue that this technique applies only to limited crimes like sexually-motivated murder, but;
    • Tina Meketa (2017) suggests a 85% increase in solved burglary cases in three US states after applying top-down profiling.
    • This expanded use adds new categories to the original method.
    • These include interpersonal and opportunistic crimes.

    Flawed Evidence

    • Top-down profiling's evidence basis is weak, because;
    • The FBI developed profiling using interviews with 36 murderers (25 serial killers).
    • At the end, 24 were classified as organised and 12 as disorganised.
    • Criticisms include a poor sample selection method, lack of random selection, and lack of a standard set of questions.
    • The different questions per interview made results incomparable, suggesting a lack of scientific basis.

    Personality Evaluation Extra

    • Top-down profiling is based on behavioural consistency, assuming serial offenders have consistent behavior (modus operandi) across crime scenes.
    • Profilers should link crime scenes to catch the offender.
    • However, situationists dispute the concept of personality, arguing that behavior is largely driven by the situation.
    • Walter Mischel (1968) argues that behavioural patterns at a crime scene may not reflect an individual's everyday behavior.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    This quiz focuses on the concept of top-down profiling in criminology, examining its origins and the research conducted by David Canter et al. It also discusses the implications of organised versus disorganised offender classifications and their real-world applications. Test your knowledge on the key features and debates surrounding this profiling approach.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser