The Engineering and Surveying vs Holmdel Heights

The plaintiffs claim that Alan Sugarman, an attorney at law, personally undertook to pay for the professional services rendered.

Alan Sugarman defends on the factual ground that he made no promise to pay for the services rendered.

Alan Sugarman defends on the legal ground that even if he made a promise to pay, it would be unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds.

<p>The trial judge ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and entered a judgment against Alan Sugarman in the amount of $24,105.30, plus interest.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Holmdel Heights Construction Company is in receivership.</p> Signup and view all the answers