Legal Case Analysis: Dosso's Conviction

Questions and Answers

What was the initial legal body that convicted Dosso for the murder he committed?

Supreme Court of Pakistan

Council of Elders (Loya Jirga) (correct)

Lahore High Court

Federal Government

What legal framework did the relatives of Dosso challenge in their petition to the Lahore High Court?

Military law imposed by Iskandar Mirza

Provisions of the 1956 Constitution

Equity before Law doctrine

Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR), 1901 (correct)

What decision did the Lahore High Court make regarding the Frontier Crimes Regulation?

It upheld the constitutionality of FCR

It suspended all cases under FCR indefinitely

It referred the case back to the Loya Jirga

It declared FCR as repugnant to the 1956 Constitution (correct)

Which Articles of the 1956 Constitution were cited by Dosso's relatives in their challenge against the FCR?

Articles 5 and 7 Signup and view all the answers

What was the final ruling of the Supreme Court of Pakistan regarding Dosso's case?

It reversed the Lahore High Court’s decision. Signup and view all the answers

The prominence of the Dosso case can be attributed to its implications on which of the following?

The legitimacy of Martial Law in Pakistan Signup and view all the answers

What was one of the consequences of the Lahore High Court's declaration against the FCR?

It opened up old cases under FCR for legal review. Signup and view all the answers

What significant political event occurred in Pakistan on October 7, 1958?

The imposition of Martial Law Signup and view all the answers

What reason did the Lahore High Court provide for declaring the Loya Jirga's proceedings against Dosso null and void?

FCR provisions being repugnant to the constitution. Signup and view all the answers

What was the main premise of the Supreme Court's judgment in the Dosso case?

The Laws (continuance in Force) order created a new legal framework Signup and view all the answers

Which theory was central to the Supreme Court's decision in the Dosso case?

Legal Positivism Signup and view all the answers

How did the Supreme Court's judgment view the imposition of Martial Law in 1958?

As a peaceful revolution supported by the people Signup and view all the answers

What did the Laws (continuance in Force) order accomplish?

It validated all laws except those of the 1956 Constitution Signup and view all the answers

What was a key consequence of the Supreme Court's decision in the context of Martial Law?

It legitimized the actions of the military government Signup and view all the answers

Which article of the 1956 Constitution was referenced in the context of the Lahore High Court's decision?

Article 5 Signup and view all the answers

What challenge did the Supreme Court face in the Dosso case regarding the 1956 Constitution?

Clarifying the overlap between martial law and constitutional law Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Case Overview

Dosso was convicted of murder in Balochistan under the tribal justice system, specifically by the Loya Jirga following the Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR) of 1901.
The Lahore High Court repealed the Loya Jirga's decision, declaring the FCR unconstitutional under the 1956 Constitution.
The Supreme Court of Pakistan reversed the Lahore High Court's ruling, raising questions about the legitimacy of Martial Law imposed on October 7, 1958.

Background of the Case

The murder occurred in Loralai district, where Dosso was arrested and tried by the Council of Elders (Loya Jirga).
His relatives petitioned the Lahore High Court against the Loya Jirga's conviction and the FCR.
The Lahore High Court ruled that the FCR violated principles of equality and the right to counsel established in Articles 5 and 7 of the 1956 Constitution.

Significant Developments

The Lahore High Court's ruling questioned previous cases adjudicated under the FCR, particularly those since the 1956 Constitution's enactment.
The Federal Government appealed to the Supreme Court against the Lahore High Court's decision.
On October 7, 1958, Martial Law was declared by President Iskandar Mirza, and Ayub Khan was appointed Chief Martial Law Administrator.

Legal Changes Post Martial Law

The Laws (Continuance in Force) Order was issued on October 11, 1958, validating laws excluding the 1956 Constitution and restoring court jurisdictions.
This order established a new legal framework, replacing the 1956 Constitution with the Laws (Continuance in Force) Order as the governing statute.

Technical Considerations

If the Supreme Court upheld the Lahore High Court’s decision, it would affirm the 1956 Constitution’s validity, challenging the Martial Law's legitimacy.
The implications of this scenario would undermine the authority of the new Martial Law regulations.

Supreme Court Judgment

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled against the Lahore High Court's verdict, endorsing the principles of Hans Kelsen's Legal Positivism.
Kelsen’s theory posits that a successful revolution (or change in governance) legitimizes itself if it reflects the people's acceptance.

Key Aspects of the Supreme Court’s Decision

The ruling legitimized the 1958 Martial Law as a 'peaceful revolution' welcomed by the populace, thereby validating its legality.
The Laws (Continuance in Force) Order was recognized as the new legal framework, superseding previous constitutional norms.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Description

Explore the intricate legal proceedings surrounding Dosso's murder conviction in Balochistan. This quiz examines the implications of the Loya Jirga's decision, the Lahore High Court's ruling, and the Supreme Court's response concerning the Frontier Crimes Regulation. Dive into the constitutional debates brought to light by this significant case.