Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is the primary characteristic of a Systematic Review?
What is the primary characteristic of a Systematic Review?
- It has an explicit study protocol and pre-specified question. (correct)
- It is a type of scoping review.
- It is a type of meta-analysis.
- It only uses quantitative data.
What is the main difference between Systematic Reviews of quantitative and qualitative data?
What is the main difference between Systematic Reviews of quantitative and qualitative data?
- The type of data used. (correct)
- The methodology used.
- The type of research question.
- The type of study design used.
What is the purpose of a meta-ethnography?
What is the purpose of a meta-ethnography?
- To conduct a thematic synthesis.
- To conduct a critical interpretive synthesis.
- To synthesize quantitative data.
- To synthesize qualitative data. (correct)
What is the primary advantage of a Systematic Review?
What is the primary advantage of a Systematic Review?
What is the main difference between a Systematic Review and a meta-analysis?
What is the main difference between a Systematic Review and a meta-analysis?
What is the primary goal of a qualitative synthesis?
What is the primary goal of a qualitative synthesis?
What is the primary purpose of using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool?
What is the primary purpose of using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool?
What is a key difference between meta-ethnography and grounded theory synthesis?
What is a key difference between meta-ethnography and grounded theory synthesis?
What is a challenge associated with conducting a meta-ethnography?
What is a challenge associated with conducting a meta-ethnography?
What is the focus of the synthesis conducted by Pound et al. (2005)?
What is the focus of the synthesis conducted by Pound et al. (2005)?
What is the approach to analysis in grounded theory synthesis?
What is the approach to analysis in grounded theory synthesis?
Who foresaw the potential for a substantive body of grounded theory studies to be abstracted to a higher level?
Who foresaw the potential for a substantive body of grounded theory studies to be abstracted to a higher level?
