Supreme Court Authority in State Cases
6 Questions
100 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the historical context of the Cohens vs. Virginia case?

  • Congress authorized selling lottery tickets in the District of Columbia.
  • Virginia created its own state lottery.
  • Virginia prohibited out-of-state lottery tickets.
  • All of the above. (correct)
  • What actions did the Cohen brothers take that led to their arrest?

    They began selling D.C. lottery tickets in Virginia.

    The state court believed Virginia's law prohibiting out-of-state lottery tickets could not be enforced.

    False

    Did Congress have the Constitutional right to review the ruling of the Virginia Supreme Court?

    <p>Yes.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding the Cohens' case?

    <p>The Supreme Court ruled it could review state criminal proceedings.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What significance did the Cohens vs. Virginia case have on federal power?

    <p>It reinforced federal power by establishing the right of the Supreme Court to review state supreme court decisions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Historical Context

    • A bill was passed by Congress allowing lottery ticket sales in the District of Columbia.
    • Virginia established its own state lottery and prohibited the sale of out-of-state lottery tickets.

    Facts

    • The Cohen brothers sold D.C. lottery tickets in Virginia.
    • They were charged and convicted by state authorities for violating Virginia's law.
    • The Virginia state court upheld the law, claiming it could be enforced despite Congressional authorization for the lottery.

    Question

    • Inquiry regarding whether Congress possessed the Constitutional authority to review the Virginia Supreme Court's ruling.

    Decision/Reasoning

    • The Supreme Court delivered a unanimous decision affirming its authority to review state criminal proceedings.
    • Chief Justice Marshall asserted the Court's role in addressing constitutional questions, regardless of the parties involved.
    • It was stated that state laws and constitutions are invalid when they conflict with the federal Constitution and laws.
    • The Court concluded that the lottery was a local matter, thus confirming the fine imposed on the Cohens.

    Significance

    • The case reinforced federal power by establishing the Supreme Court's right to review state supreme court decisions in matters concerning the Constitution and federal authority.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the implications of a Supreme Court ruling regarding Congress's authority to review state laws. This quiz delves into the historical context of lottery sales and the interplay between state and federal laws. Test your understanding of the constitutional principles at play.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser