StringBuffer vs

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

Why are StringBuffer objects considered more efficient than String objects for multiple modifications to a string?

  • StringBuffer objects are immutable
  • Modifying a String object creates a new object and discards the old one (correct)
  • String objects provide better memory management
  • StringBuffer objects are not thread-safe

Which of the following is a key advantage of using StringBuffer over regular String objects in Java?

  • StringBuffer objects are immutable
  • StringBuffer objects require synchronization for thread safety
  • Mutable nature allows modification of contents after creation (correct)
  • String objects are more efficient than StringBuffer objects

In the context of thread safety, what distinguishes StringBuffer objects from String objects?

  • Both StringBuffer and String objects are thread-safe
  • String objects are thread-safe, while StringBuffer objects are not
  • Neither StringBuffer nor String objects are thread-safe
  • StringBuffer objects are thread-safe, while String objects are not (correct)

What type of character sequences do StringBuffer and String represent, respectively?

<p>StringBuffer represents growable and writable character sequences, while String represents fixed-length, immutable character sequences (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a notable difference between StringBuffer and String in terms of modification?

<p>StringBuffer objects allow modification of contents after creation, while String objects do not (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards are hidden until you start studying

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser