Stanley Milgram Experiment: Destructive Obedience
8 Questions
1 Views

Stanley Milgram Experiment: Destructive Obedience

Created by
@MatchlessDevotion

Questions and Answers

What was the primary goal of Stanley Milgram's experiment?

  • To investigate the role of anxiety in decision-making
  • To examine the conflict between obedience to authority and personal morals (correct)
  • To study the effects of punishment on learning
  • To explore the impact of electric shocks on human behavior
  • What percentage of participants administered the maximum 450-volt shock?

  • 65% (correct)
  • 50%
  • 25%
  • 40%
  • What was the role of the actor in the experiment?

  • To receive actual electric shocks
  • To administer electric shocks to the participant
  • To pretend to receive electric shocks (correct)
  • To observe the participant's behavior
  • What was the age range of the participants in the experiment?

    <p>20-50</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the increment in voltage after each incorrect answer?

    <p>15 volts</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the key finding of the experiment?

    <p>Obedience to authority can lead individuals to engage in destructive behavior</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the inspiration behind Milgram's experiment?

    <p>The Nazi war crimes and the Holocaust</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one of the implications of the experiment?

    <p>The importance of critical thinking</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Destructive Obedience: Stanley Milgram Experiment

    Background

    • Conducted by Stanley Milgram in 1961 at Yale University
    • Investigated the conflict between obedience to authority and personal morals
    • Inspired by the Nazi war crimes and the role of obedience in the Holocaust

    Experiment Design

    • 40 male participants, aged 20-50, from various occupations
    • Participants were paired with another person (an actor) and told to administer electric shocks to the other person each time they answered a question incorrectly
    • Participants were told the experiment was to study the effects of punishment on learning
    • The actor was not actually receiving shocks, but pretended to be in pain

    Procedure

    • Participants were instructed to increase the voltage of the shock by 15 volts after each incorrect answer
    • The actor would protest and express pain as the voltage increased
    • Participants were encouraged by the experimenter to continue administering shocks, despite their reservations

    Results

    • 65% of participants administered the maximum 450-volt shock, despite the actor's pleas to stop
    • Many participants showed signs of distress and anxiety, but continued to obey the experimenter's instructions
    • Only 1 participant refused to continue at the 150-volt level

    Key Findings

    • Obedience to authority can lead individuals to engage in destructive behavior
    • People are more likely to obey an authority figure, even if it goes against their personal morals
    • The presence of an authority figure can reduce personal responsibility and increase the likelihood of obedience

    Implications

    • Highlights the dangers of blind obedience and the importance of critical thinking
    • Provides insight into the psychological mechanisms underlying destructive obedience
    • Has implications for our understanding of human behavior in situations like the Holocaust, Abu Ghraib, and other atrocities

    Stanley Milgram Experiment

    Background

    • Conducted in 1961 at Yale University to investigate the conflict between obedience to authority and personal morals
    • Inspired by the Nazi war crimes and the role of obedience in the Holocaust

    Experiment Design

    • 40 male participants, aged 20-50, from various occupations were paired with an actor
    • Participants were told to administer electric shocks to the actor for each incorrect answer, with the goal of studying punishment on learning
    • The actor pretended to receive shocks and expressed pain as voltage increased

    Procedure

    • Participants increased voltage by 15 volts after each incorrect answer
    • Actor protested and expressed pain, while participants were encouraged by the experimenter to continue

    Results

    • 65% of participants administered the maximum 450-volt shock despite the actor's pleas
    • Participants showed signs of distress and anxiety, but continued to obey the experimenter
    • Only 1 participant refused to continue at the 150-volt level

    Key Findings

    • Obedience to authority can lead individuals to engage in destructive behavior
    • People obey authority figures even if it goes against their personal morals
    • Authority figures reduce personal responsibility and increase obedience likelihood

    Implications

    • Highlights the dangers of blind obedience and the importance of critical thinking
    • Provides insight into psychological mechanisms underlying destructive obedience
    • Has implications for understanding human behavior in situations like the Holocaust and Abu Ghraib

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the famous psychology experiment that investigated the conflict between obedience to authority and personal morals, and its relation to the Holocaust.

    More Quizzes Like This

    Stanley Milgram's Obedience Experiment
    12 questions
    Psychology of Obedience
    10 questions
    Stanley's Release Flashcards
    26 questions

    Stanley's Release Flashcards

    SensationalChrysoprase468 avatar
    SensationalChrysoprase468
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser