Software Development Models Quiz

A software development approach used when technical solutions are unclear. A prototype is created to explore potential issues early on.

A software development model where the system is built incrementally, starting with a simple working model and adding features iteratively until the desired product is complete.

A software development model that employs iterative loops for each phase of the project, where risk assessment guides each iteration.

An early sample or model of a product or system to test or demonstrate key features.

Developing software in small, distinct parts that are delivered to the customer progressively throughout the project.

Evaluating potential problems or uncertainties that may affect a software project.

A preliminary evaluation to determine if a software project is technically and economically viable.

Documenting the features, functions, and user needs for the software.

The initial phase of the Spiral Model, focusing on identifying project objectives and analyzing associated risks.

The phase of the Spiral Model where potential risks are thoroughly investigated and strategies are implemented to minimize their impact.

The phase of the Spiral Model where the project's functionality is developed and tested after addressing identified risks.

The final phase of the Spiral Model, where progress is evaluated with stakeholders, and plans are made for the next iteration.

An approach that improves upon the traditional Waterfall Model by incorporating iterative cycles for development and testing. This model is better suited for handling errors and evolving requirements.

The Spiral Model is ideal for complex projects with numerous risks. It allows for continuous risk mitigation and adaptation.

The level of trust and belief a customer has in the software development team's ability to deliver a successful product.

The process of collecting and documenting all the necessary information about the software system from the customer.

A specialist who bridges the gap between the customer and the software development team, responsible for understanding and documenting the customer's requirements.

Developing software in small, manageable parts that are delivered to the customer progressively throughout the project.

Incremental development allows the customer to pay for the software in smaller installments, avoiding a large upfront investment.

The discomfort or stress a customer may feel when transitioning to a completely new software system.

The central issue or challenge that the software project aims to address.

The different approaches or methods that could potentially address the problem.

The information or data that the software system receives to process.

The information or data that the software system produces as a result of its processing.

The specific tasks or actions that the software system must perform to fulfill its purpose.

The qualities or characteristics of the software system, such as performance, security, usability, and maintainability.

General guidelines or suggestions about the software development process, including balancing design objectives.

The process of converting input data into meaningful output data within the software system.

A scenario that describes the process of withdrawing cash from an ATM, involving different user interactions and data processing.

The range of possible values that the user can provide as input to a system.

The possible outcomes or data that the system can provide as output.

This sub-requirement represents the first step in the withdraw cash function, where the user selects the option to withdraw cash.

This sub-requirement represents the second step, where the user selects the type of account they wish to withdraw from.

This sub-requirement represents the third step, where the user enters the amount they want to withdraw.

Smaller, more specific requirements within a high-level functional requirement that detail user interactions and processing steps.

A document that outlines the detailed requirements of a software system from the customer's perspective.

A good SRS document should be concise and avoid unnecessary details while remaining clear and complete.

An SRS should be well-organized to ease understanding and modification, as customer requirements may evolve.

An SRS should specify what the system should do, not how it does it, focusing on external behavior.

An SRS should have a clear and consistent theme to make it understandable to all parties.

An SRS should outline how the system will handle errors or unexpected situations.

All requirements in an SRS should be testable, ensuring that they are met by the final implementation.

Lack of an SRS can lead to miscommunication, inconsistent development, and difficult maintenance.