19 Questions
What was the primary cause of Clara Lovsky's death according to the Crown's medical expert?
Asphyxiation due to the position she was left in after being tied up
What was the primary defense argument made by the accused, Mr. Neat, regarding his confession to the crime?
The confession was fabricated and not truthful
What was the ultimate criminal charge that Mr. Neat was facing?
First-degree murder
What was the key issue that the Canadian Supreme Court had to address in this case?
Whether the accused could be held criminally liable for the victim's death
What terminology does Justice Leroux Dubé propose to use in place of 'not significant' or 'not trivial' in the causation standard?
Significant contributing cause
How do the four justices who disagreed with the reformulation of the Smithers test perceive the term 'significant' compared to 'not insignificant'?
Significant means more than not insignificant
What impact does the reformulation of the Smithers test have on the causation threshold for culpable homicide?
Increases the causation threshold
Why do some scholars and jurists challenge the court's reformulation of the Smithers test?
They see a substantive change in the causation standard
What was expressed by Justice Claire Lerue Dubé in her concurring opinion regarding the Smithers test?
Doubts about the reformulation's impact on defendants
How do the judges who wrote the concurring opinion perceive the change in language in terms of semantics versus substance?
'Significant' changes the substance of the standard
What is required for causation to be established in Canadian criminal law?
The offender's action or omission must be a contributing cause of the prohibited result or harm.
According to the Smithers test for causation in Canadian criminal law, what is required for the accused's conduct to establish factual causation?
The accused's conduct must contribute to the victim's death or injury outside of the minimus range.
What was the key issue before the Canadian Supreme Court in the case of The Queen v. Neate?
Whether the standard of causation applicable was the 'beyond the minimus' standard articulated in Smithers.
What was the outcome of the Canadian Supreme Court's decision in The Queen v. Neate?
The court upheld the defendant's conviction for second-degree murder.
What was the key disagreement among the judges in the Canadian Supreme Court's decision in The Queen v. Neate?
Whether the majority's reformulation of the Smithers test was appropriate.
What was the majority's view on the Smithers test for causation in The Queen v. Neate?
The Smithers test was sound in substance but could be improved in its articulation.
What is the key purpose of the causation requirement in Canadian criminal law?
To prevent individuals from being held criminally liable for harm they did not cause.
What is the key difference between the Smithers test and the majority's reformulation of the test in The Queen v. Neate?
The Smithers test is focused on the substance of the causation requirement, while the reformulated test is focused on the articulation of the test.
What is the significance of the Canadian Supreme Court's decision in Smithers v. The Queen for understanding causation in Canadian criminal law?
It established the authoritative test for factual causation in Canadian criminal law.
Explore the complexities of proving causal link in criminal cases, particularly related to someone's death. Learn how to establish causation in legal contexts where one action may not be the sole cause of a tragic outcome.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
