Criminal Liability: Omissions Quiz

<p>A dominant party might impose their will. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Mediation (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>A legal duty to act must exist. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>R v Pittwood (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Duty arising from a special relationship (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Failing to provide adequate care (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Duty arising from the creation of a dangerous situation (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>R v Dytham (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>They may face criminal liability. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Existence of a duty to act and a breach of that duty (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Allows for detailed evidence gathering (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>A breach of contract claim for £15,000 (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>It is less formal and usually quicker. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Parties may fail to agree. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Divorce and child custody cases (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Arbitration Act 1996 (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>It provides flexibility and is conducted online. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>It can be faster and less formal. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>They actively encourage settlement but do not impose decisions. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>High-value or complex claims (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Potential penalties from the courts. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Online Dispute Resolution (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Resolution within a specific timeframe (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Liability imposed without proving intention (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Serious criminal offenses (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Storkwain (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>The guilty act or conduct (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>They promote public safety (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Unlawful force or apprehension of unlawful force (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Causing a broken bone (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Recklessness regarding some harm (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>The actions directly causing the victim's injuries (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Leads to unjust punishment without fault (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>A break in both layers of skin (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>No defenses are allowed (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>The intent behind the statute (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Intention to cause serious harm (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>R v Latimer for hitting a bystander (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Assault does not require physical contact (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>S.47 (ABH) (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Involves a trial expected to last no more than one day (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Battery must involve severe injury to be classified as an offense (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>The intent to harm one person targets a different victim (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Unlawful application of force (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Punching someone leaving a bruise (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Up to 6 months' imprisonment or a fine (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Belief that the act will not cause harm (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Up to £10,000 excluding personal injury (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Intention or recklessness as to causing fear of immediate unlawful force (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Serious emotional distress (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A legal obligation to act in a certain way, which arises from a statute.

A duty to act that arises from a contract, which can lead to liability if not fulfilled.

A duty to act that stems from a close relationship, like a parent-child or spouse relationship.

A duty to act that emerges when someone voluntarily takes responsibility for another person.

A duty to act that arises when someone creates a dangerous situation and fails to prevent harm.

A duty to act that arises from holding a position of authority, like a police officer or government official.

The legal principle that an individual can be found liable for a crime because they failed to act when they had a legal duty to do so.

The prosecution must prove that the defendant had a legal duty to act and that they breached that duty for omissions to result in liability.

A legal principle where a person can be held liable for harm caused by their actions, even without a guilty mind (mens rea).

The physical element of a crime. It's the action itself.

The mental element of a crime. It's the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing.

Offenses where the prosecution only needs to prove the actus reus, not the mens rea. The defendant's intent is irrelevant.

Laws that are primarily designed to protect public safety, health, and the environment.

Harm that is more than trivial but less than serious. It can include bruises, cuts, or psychological harm.

A crime that involves causing actual bodily harm to another person.

The act of causing another person to apprehend immediate unlawful force.

The unlawful application of force to another person.

Serious harm that can include broken bones, serious cuts, or significant psychological injury.

A break in both layers of the skin, causing bleeding.

A crime involving causing grievous bodily harm or wounding.

A crime involving intentionally causing grievous bodily harm or wounding.

A case where the House of Lords ruled that strict liability was not applicable to a crime involving serious criminal activity.

The legal concept of requiring proof of mens rea for a crime.

The defendant must have intended to cause serious harm. It's not enough to be reckless; there must be a clear intention to cause serious harm.

When the defendant intends to harm one person but accidentally harms another, their guilty mind is transferred to the unintended victim.

A term used to describe both assault and battery together. It's a summary offense, meaning it's generally dealt with in a less formal way.

The lowest level of court proceedings in England and Wales, designed for simple cases with low value amounts.

A track in the English legal system for claims with a higher value than the Small Claims Track, but still relatively straightforward.

The actus reus (guilty act) of battery is the application of unlawful force to another person.

The mens rea (guilty mind) of battery is the intention or recklessness to apply unlawful force.

The actus reus of assault is causing the victim to apprehend imminent unlawful force.

The mens rea of assault is the intention or recklessness to cause the victim to apprehend imminent unlawful force.

A legal principle that applies when a defendant intends harm to one person but accidentally harms another.

This doctrine only applies if the offense committed is of the same type as the one intended.

The intent or recklessness towards the original victim transfers to the unintended victim.

A method of resolving disputes outside of court, where parties work together to reach an agreement. Examples include negotiation, mediation, and arbitration.

A process where parties discuss and negotiate a solution to their conflict, often with the help of a neutral third party.

A method where a neutral third party helps parties communicate and reach a mutually agreeable solution. This outcome is not legally binding.

A process where a neutral third party makes a binding decision to resolve a conflict.

A method where a neutral third party suggests solutions to a dispute, but the decision is not legally binding.

Using technology to resolve disputes online, particularly helpful for smaller claims.

A flexible track for more complex cases, allowing for tailored case management.

A timetable aimed at resolving cases within 30 weeks of them being allocated.

A court where the Fast Track and Multi-Track are heard, for cases involving more significant amounts.

A court where more complex Multi-Track cases, especially those exceeding £100,000, may be heard.

The party initiating a legal claim, seeking justice or compensation.

The party defending against a legal claim, arguing against the request.

The total amount of money a claimant requests for damages or losses.