Rebutting the Cosmological Argument - Fallacy of Composition

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

What is the fallacy of composition as presented in the text?

  • Considering the front door's color as irrelevant
  • Jumping to conclusions without any evidence
  • Inferring that all things in the universe are contingent
  • Inferring that a characteristic of a thing applies to the whole thing (correct)

According to Hume, what does the cosmological argument lead us to conclude?

  • Contingent things can bring themselves into existence
  • All contingent things are impossible
  • The universe is entirely contingent
  • The fallacy that there must be a necessary being on which all contingent things depend (correct)

What did Martin Luther King say about faith, relating to our understanding of the universe?

  • 'We must see the full staircase before having faith'
  • 'Faith is the first step without seeing the full staircase' (correct)
  • 'Concrete evidence must precede faith'
  • 'Faith is based on concrete evidence'

In Aquinas' 3rd way, what does the term 'necessary being' refer to?

<p>A being that must exist for all contingent beings to exist (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does Mackie object to regarding the idea of a necessary being as proposed by Aquinas?

<p>'Mackie finds the notion of a necessary being objectionable' (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does epistemic distance relate to our understanding of Aquinas' 3rd way?

<p>It necessitates a leap of faith in understanding Aquinas' argument (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards are hidden until you start studying

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser