Rebutting the Cosmological Argument - Fallacy of Composition
6 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the fallacy of composition as presented in the text?

  • Considering the front door's color as irrelevant
  • Jumping to conclusions without any evidence
  • Inferring that all things in the universe are contingent
  • Inferring that a characteristic of a thing applies to the whole thing (correct)

According to Hume, what does the cosmological argument lead us to conclude?

  • Contingent things can bring themselves into existence
  • All contingent things are impossible
  • The universe is entirely contingent
  • The fallacy that there must be a necessary being on which all contingent things depend (correct)

What did Martin Luther King say about faith, relating to our understanding of the universe?

  • 'We must see the full staircase before having faith'
  • 'Faith is the first step without seeing the full staircase' (correct)
  • 'Concrete evidence must precede faith'
  • 'Faith is based on concrete evidence'

In Aquinas' 3rd way, what does the term 'necessary being' refer to?

<p>A being that must exist for all contingent beings to exist (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does Mackie object to regarding the idea of a necessary being as proposed by Aquinas?

<p>'Mackie finds the notion of a necessary being objectionable' (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does epistemic distance relate to our understanding of Aquinas' 3rd way?

<p>It necessitates a leap of faith in understanding Aquinas' argument (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser