Podcast
Questions and Answers
In the Prisoner's Dilemma, why does individual incentive often undermine the best collective outcome?
In the Prisoner's Dilemma, why does individual incentive often undermine the best collective outcome?
- Because there's always a lack of available information.
- Because individual incentives can lead to non-cooperation, even when cooperation would yield a better outcome for all. (correct)
- Because the authorities always know what's best for the group.
- Because individuals prioritize cooperation over self-interest.
What is a key consequence of acting uncooperatively in multiple-round conflicts?
What is a key consequence of acting uncooperatively in multiple-round conflicts?
- It always guarantees better outcomes in the long run.
- It can lead to a loss of trust and reduced cooperation, ultimately resulting in worse outcomes for all parties involved. (correct)
- It leads to increased trust and cooperation among parties.
- It accelerates the negotiation process.
Why is the Tit-for-Tat strategy considered effective in repeated interactions?
Why is the Tit-for-Tat strategy considered effective in repeated interactions?
- It starts cooperatively but retaliates against non-cooperation, and then forgives cooperative behavior, promoting a balanced approach. (correct)
- It discourages future interactions.
- It ensures predictability by always escalating conflict.
- It maximizes individual gains regardless of the other party's actions.
What is a significant limitation of the Tit-for-Tat strategy?
What is a significant limitation of the Tit-for-Tat strategy?
How does 'sinister attribution error' affect conflict?
How does 'sinister attribution error' affect conflict?
How does Actor-Observer Bias
manifest in conflict situations?
How does Actor-Observer Bias
manifest in conflict situations?
What is the function of a BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) in a negotiation?
What is the function of a BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) in a negotiation?
How do 'anchoring and adjusting' tactics influence negotiations?
How do 'anchoring and adjusting' tactics influence negotiations?
In the context of ethical dilemmas, what does Consequentialism/Utilitarianism
prioritize?
In the context of ethical dilemmas, what does Consequentialism/Utilitarianism
prioritize?
How does Fundamental Attribution Error
affect perceptions in organizational behavior?
How does Fundamental Attribution Error
affect perceptions in organizational behavior?
Flashcards
Prisoner's Dilemma
Prisoner's Dilemma
Choosing between cooperation and self-interest. Best outcome when both cooperate.
Uncooperative Conflicts
Uncooperative Conflicts
Leads to mistrust and reduced cooperation, worsening outcomes over time. Strategic thinking is key.
Tit-for-Tat Strategy
Tit-for-Tat Strategy
Starts cooperative, retaliates against non-cooperation, and forgives cooperation.
Limits of Tit-for-Tat
Limits of Tit-for-Tat
Signup and view all the flashcards
Sinister Attribution Error
Sinister Attribution Error
Signup and view all the flashcards
Actor-Observer Bias
Actor-Observer Bias
Signup and view all the flashcards
Resistance Point
Resistance Point
Signup and view all the flashcards
Target Point
Target Point
Signup and view all the flashcards
Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA)
Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Zone of Potential Agreement (ZOPA)
Zone of Potential Agreement (ZOPA)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Prisoners' Dilemma Style Conflict
- Involves a choice between cooperation and self-interest
- The best collective outcome happens when both parties cooperate
- Individual incentives can disrupt cooperation
- "Information dilemma" is an example where withholding information benefits individuals but sharing benefits the group
Consequences of Uncooperative Actions
- Acting uncooperatively in multiple rounds leads to a loss of trust
- Can result in reduced cooperation and worse outcomes for all involved parties over time
- Promotes the importance of long-term strategic thinking
Tit-for-Tat Strategy
- Begins cooperatively
- Retaliates against non-cooperation
- Forgives cooperative behavior
- Works well in repeated interactions like competitive advertising
Limits and Dangers of Tit-for-Tat
- Can cause endless retaliation cycles
- Doesn't work well if mistakes occur
- Vulnerable if the opponent exploits its predictability
Biased Punctuation of Feud History
- Individuals construe conflicts self-servingly
- This leads to the reinforcement of feuds
- Attribution errors lead to biased punctuation
- Sinister Attribution Error involves assuming bad intentions behind an action
- Actor-Observer Bias involves attributing own's actions to circumstances, and others' actions to their character
- Hanlon's Razor suggests not attributing malice to what can be explained by incompetence or ignorance
Understanding Sayings
- "Lightning never falls from a blue sky" indicates that unexpected negative actions often have a buildup
- "The tree remembers what the axe forgets" implies harmful actions have lasting impacts, even if forgotten by the doer
Negotiation Goals and Parameters
- Resistance Point stands for the worst acceptable outcome
- Target is the ideal outcome
- BATNA (Best Alternative to Negotiated Agreement) means a backup plan
- Zone of Potential Agreement (ZOPA) defines the range where a deal is possible
Negotiation Tactics
- Lowball/Highball means beginning with extreme offers to shift expectations
- Anchoring and Adjusting means setting an initial reference point to shape negotiations
- "Split the Difference" involves finding a midpoint solution
- Logrolling involves trading off priorities for mutual gain
- Win-Win Agreements produce better results than Win-Lose or Lose-Lose Agreements, where cooperation and flexibility are critical
Ethical Challenges as Dilemmas
- Ethical issues may involve choosing competing "right" choices rather than a clear right vs. wrong
Ethical Dilemma Frameworks
- Consequentialism/Utilitarianism is to judge actions by outcomes that is the greatest good for the greatest number
- Deontological Ethics is to judge actions by adherence to moral rules
- Virtue Ethics is to judge actions by moral character
Blind Spots in Ethical Reasoning
- Biases prevent objective moral decision-making
International Management Styles
- Expatriate managers may prefer their home country's practices, affecting effectiveness abroad
International Business Arrangements
- Franchising involves licensing a brand or business model
- Licensing involves permitting the use of intellectual property
- Strategic Alliance is a cooperative agreement without equity exchange
- Foreign Subsidiary represents a fully owned foreign operation
- Joint Ventures are partnerships between two companies for mutual benefit
Tariffs
- Tariffs are taxes on imported goods, affecting trade and pricing strategies
International Business Practices
- Dumping involves selling goods below market value in foreign markets
- Global Sourcing involves procuring goods or services internationally for cost or efficiency
Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions
- Represents a framework for understanding cultural differences
- Examples includes: individualism vs. collectivism and power distance
Organizational Behavior Discipline
- The study of how people behave within organizations
- Impacts leadership and organizational culture
Big Five Personality Traits
- Includes: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism
- These are used to predict behavior in the workplace
Cognitive Biases
- Confirmation Bias is favoring information that supports existing beliefs
- Fundamental Attribution Error means overemphasizing personality in explaining others' behavior while underemphasizing situational factors
Theory of Social Intuition
- Ethical decisions rely on immediate gut reactions rather than deliberate reasoning
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
Exploration of the Prisoner's Dilemma and its implications for cooperation versus self-interest. Discusses the consequences of uncooperative actions, focusing on loss of trust and reduced collective outcomes. Examines the Tit-for-Tat strategy, including its advantages, limitations, and potential dangers.