Philippine Literature & Revolution Quiz

What was the main goal of the propaganda literature during the Philippine Revolution?

Which newspaper became the voice of Filipinos seeking reform during the revolution?

What type of literature includes Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo?

What was the significance of GOMBURZA in the Filipino Revolution?

Which character in Noli Me Tangere represents corruption and injustice within the Church?

What did Crisostomo Ibarra believe was key to Filipino progress?

What role did the friars play in the Filipino education system under Spanish rule?

What does Marxist literary theory primarily focus on when analyzing a text?

Which aspect does deconstruction primarily encourage readers to focus on?

Which statement best captures the essence of Formalism as a literary theory?

What is the main idea of New Historicism in relation to literature?

According to Reader-Response Criticism, meaning in a text is primarily derived from what?

What role does Marxism attribute to literature in society?

What does Deconstruction suggest about the nature of language in texts?

Which literary theory primarily analyzes narrative techniques, rhythm, and rhyme?

In the context of New Historicism, which factors are emphasized during literary interpretation?

Propaganda literature’s main goal was to inspire reform and promote equality for Filipinos under Spanish rule.
La Solidaridad served as a platform for Filipinos seeking reforms during the Revolution.
Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo are notable examples of political novels produced during the revolution.
Jose Rizal was a key figure associated with La Solidaridad, advocating for reform.
GOMBURZA, a group of priests executed in 1872, fueled the movement for reform due to their execution sparking outrage.
Crisostomo Ibarra believed education was key to Filipino progress.
Padre Damaso represents corruption and injustice within the Church.
Friars under Spanish rule limited the curriculum to suppress revolution, limiting Filipino education.

Marxist literary theory focuses on class struggle and socio-economic factors influencing text.
Deconstruction encourages readers to question fixed interpretations and expose contradictions in a text.
Formalism prioritizes form and structure over content and context.
New Historicism believes literature and history influence each other, impacting both.
Reader-Response criticism argues that meaning in a text is created through the interaction between reader and text.
Marxism suggests that literature can be a tool for both oppression and social change.
Deconstruction reveals that language is unstable and full of contradictions.
Formalism analyzes rhythm, rhyme, and other formal elements of a text.
New Historicism emphasizes historical, social, and cultural forces in interpreting literature.
Reader-Response Criticism focuses on the individual reader’s subjective experience and interpretation.