Podcast
Questions and Answers
According to Section 16(1) of the Patents Act, an invention meets the industrial application criterion only if it can be mass-produced in a factory setting, excluding fields such as handcrafted artisanal goods.
According to Section 16(1) of the Patents Act, an invention meets the industrial application criterion only if it can be mass-produced in a factory setting, excluding fields such as handcrafted artisanal goods.
False (B)
A renowned cardiac surgeon develops a novel surgical procedure that significantly reduces recovery time for patients undergoing heart valve replacements. Considering Section 16(2) of the Patents Act, which statement accurately reflects the patentability of this procedure?
A renowned cardiac surgeon develops a novel surgical procedure that significantly reduces recovery time for patients undergoing heart valve replacements. Considering Section 16(2) of the Patents Act, which statement accurately reflects the patentability of this procedure?
- The surgical procedure is patentable, as it leads to tangible improvements in patient recovery and healthcare efficiency.
- The surgical procedure is not patentable, as methods of treatment by surgery on the human body are excluded from being considered capable of industrial application. (correct)
- The surgical procedure is patentable only if it incorporates a new medical device that is also patented.
- The surgical procedure is patentable because it is a process used in the medical field and thus meets the criteria for industrial application.
A pharmaceutical company patents a new chemical compound demonstrating significant efficacy in treating a rare genetic disorder. The patent specification sufficiently details the compound's synthesis and its mechanism of action. However, its in vivo efficacy data included in the patent is deemed unreliable because the experiments were not repeated. According to Section 25(4) of the Patents Act, which of the following is most likely?
A pharmaceutical company patents a new chemical compound demonstrating significant efficacy in treating a rare genetic disorder. The patent specification sufficiently details the compound's synthesis and its mechanism of action. However, its in vivo efficacy data included in the patent is deemed unreliable because the experiments were not repeated. According to Section 25(4) of the Patents Act, which of the following is most likely?
- The patent is likely valid, as long as the specification allows someone skilled in the art to perform the invention, even if some experimental data is questionnable. (correct)
- The accuracy of scientific data is irrelevant so long as the method is clearly and completely described.
- The patent is automatically invalid because the _in vivo_ efficacy data is unreliable, regardless of other evidence of its efficacy.
- The patent is provisionally valid until independent verification of the in vivo efficacy of the compound is presented.
Explain how Section 13(2) of the Patents Act relates to the patentability of an invention designed to automatically generate malicious software for cybersecurity testing, considering various ethical and legal viewpoints.
Explain how Section 13(2) of the Patents Act relates to the patentability of an invention designed to automatically generate malicious software for cybersecurity testing, considering various ethical and legal viewpoints.
A research laboratory develops a novel method for synthesizing a complex organic molecule with significant pharmaceutical applications. To expedite the patent grant process, the applicant requests early publication under Section 27(2) of the Patents Act. Which potential consequences should the applicant consider as a result of this early publication?
A research laboratory develops a novel method for synthesizing a complex organic molecule with significant pharmaceutical applications. To expedite the patent grant process, the applicant requests early publication under Section 27(2) of the Patents Act. Which potential consequences should the applicant consider as a result of this early publication?
According to Section 36(1) of the Patents Act, a granted patent remains in force for a maximum period of __________ years from the __________.
According to Section 36(1) of the Patents Act, a granted patent remains in force for a maximum period of __________ years from the __________.
A startup company is considering filing a patent for its breakthrough invention. Which pre-filing consideration related to 'Disclosure of Invention' is MOST critical for the company to evaluate to protect its rights effectively?
A startup company is considering filing a patent for its breakthrough invention. Which pre-filing consideration related to 'Disclosure of Invention' is MOST critical for the company to evaluate to protect its rights effectively?
A company's business objective and budget will not significantly affect its filing strategy when applying for a patent.
A company's business objective and budget will not significantly affect its filing strategy when applying for a patent.
Under what conditions, as stipulated in Sections 49 and 50 of the Patents Act, an invention made by an employee is considered to belong to the employer?
Under what conditions, as stipulated in Sections 49 and 50 of the Patents Act, an invention made by an employee is considered to belong to the employer?
An engineering firm initiates IP due diligence before filing a patent application. Which search would be most useful for them to conduct?
An engineering firm initiates IP due diligence before filing a patent application. Which search would be most useful for them to conduct?
Under Section 66(1)(a) of the Patents Act, importing a product made using a patented process does not constitute patent infringement if the importer was unaware that the product was manufactured using said patented process.
Under Section 66(1)(a) of the Patents Act, importing a product made using a patented process does not constitute patent infringement if the importer was unaware that the product was manufactured using said patented process.
According to Section 113(1) of the Patents Act, the extent of protection conferred by a patent is based on the invention as __________ in a __________.
According to Section 113(1) of the Patents Act, the extent of protection conferred by a patent is based on the invention as __________ in a __________.
In the case of Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies Pte Ltd, what was decisively rejected?
In the case of Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies Pte Ltd, what was decisively rejected?
According to Section 66(1) of the Patents Act, an alleged infringement can be defended on the grounds that the patent is invalid if it does not fulfill patentability criteria, and this can be raised as a counterclaim to revoke the patent.
According to Section 66(1) of the Patents Act, an alleged infringement can be defended on the grounds that the patent is invalid if it does not fulfill patentability criteria, and this can be raised as a counterclaim to revoke the patent.
In what specific situations, as defined by Section 66(2) of the Patents Act, can an act that would otherwise constitute patent infringement be considered defensible?
In what specific situations, as defined by Section 66(2) of the Patents Act, can an act that would otherwise constitute patent infringement be considered defensible?
Under Section 69(1) of the Patents Act, what condition must be met for a defendant to avoid damages or an account of profits in a patent infringement case?
Under Section 69(1) of the Patents Act, what condition must be met for a defendant to avoid damages or an account of profits in a patent infringement case?
Under Section 80(1) of the Patents Act, in which situation can a patent be revoked?
Under Section 80(1) of the Patents Act, in which situation can a patent be revoked?
Under Section 80(7) of the Patents Act, the legal effect of a patent revocation is that such revocation takes effect from the __________.
Under Section 80(7) of the Patents Act, the legal effect of a patent revocation is that such revocation takes effect from the __________.
Explain in detail the process outlined in Section 82(1)(d) and Rule 80 for patent revocation at the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS).
Explain in detail the process outlined in Section 82(1)(d) and Rule 80 for patent revocation at the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS).
A biotech company discovers a naturally occurring microbe capable of biodegrading plastic waste at an unprecedented rate. The company seeks patent protection for this microbe and its application. Which of the following statements reflects the most pertinent consideration regarding industrial applicability under the Singapore Patents Act?
A biotech company discovers a naturally occurring microbe capable of biodegrading plastic waste at an unprecedented rate. The company seeks patent protection for this microbe and its application. Which of the following statements reflects the most pertinent consideration regarding industrial applicability under the Singapore Patents Act?
Once a Notice of Eligibility to proceed to grant is issued, the applicant has no further opportunity to amend the patent application.
Once a Notice of Eligibility to proceed to grant is issued, the applicant has no further opportunity to amend the patent application.
According to the 'patent bargain,' as articulated in Liardet v Johnson (1778), the inventor must specify their invention in such a way as to teach an artist how to make it so that after the __________ ends, the public shall have the benefit.
According to the 'patent bargain,' as articulated in Liardet v Johnson (1778), the inventor must specify their invention in such a way as to teach an artist how to make it so that after the __________ ends, the public shall have the benefit.
Outline the two-step test established in First Currency Choice Pte Ltd [2008] 1 SLR(R) 335 at [60]-[61] for assessing sufficiency in patent law.
Outline the two-step test established in First Currency Choice Pte Ltd [2008] 1 SLR(R) 335 at [60]-[61] for assessing sufficiency in patent law.
Consider a scenario where an inventor creates a device that amplifies human aggression using subliminal audio frequencies. The invention demonstrably increases violent behavior in controlled environments. Which section of the Patents Act would likely prevent the patenting of this invention?
Consider a scenario where an inventor creates a device that amplifies human aggression using subliminal audio frequencies. The invention demonstrably increases violent behavior in controlled environments. Which section of the Patents Act would likely prevent the patenting of this invention?
Under Singapore Patent Law, publication of a patent application automatically results in the patent being granted, provided all administrative requirements are met.
Under Singapore Patent Law, publication of a patent application automatically results in the patent being granted, provided all administrative requirements are met.
As per Patents Rule 51(1), to maintain an active patent after it's granted, the proprietor must remit annual __________ commencing from the close of the __________ year measured from the initial filing date.
As per Patents Rule 51(1), to maintain an active patent after it's granted, the proprietor must remit annual __________ commencing from the close of the __________ year measured from the initial filing date.
Describe in detail the function of the 'grace period' in the context of assessing novelty and inventive step during patent examination, as well as its potential limitations.
Describe in detail the function of the 'grace period' in the context of assessing novelty and inventive step during patent examination, as well as its potential limitations.
Alpha Corp develops a new technology and considers its filing strategy. Which factor is most relevant when devising this plan?
Alpha Corp develops a new technology and considers its filing strategy. Which factor is most relevant when devising this plan?
An agreement between an employer and employee regarding the rights to employee inventions supersedes the provisions outlined in Sections 49 and 50 of the Patents Act.
An agreement between an employer and employee regarding the rights to employee inventions supersedes the provisions outlined in Sections 49 and 50 of the Patents Act.
For a defendant to be restricted from relief under Section 69(1) of the Patents Act, Singapore, it isn't enough to show awareness, but rather, awareness or reasonable grounds to surmise the patent's existence must be tied to the __________.
For a defendant to be restricted from relief under Section 69(1) of the Patents Act, Singapore, it isn't enough to show awareness, but rather, awareness or reasonable grounds to surmise the patent's existence must be tied to the __________.
Elaborate on the legal ramifications of patent revocation under Section 80(7) of the Patents Act.
Elaborate on the legal ramifications of patent revocation under Section 80(7) of the Patents Act.
A pharmaceutical company, Beta Pharmaceuticals, discovers that a competitor, Gamma Corp, is manufacturing and selling a drug that infringes on Beta’s patented compound. In assessing the infringement, Beta's legal team focuses on 'literal construction' of the patent claims. Which of the following best describes this approach?
A pharmaceutical company, Beta Pharmaceuticals, discovers that a competitor, Gamma Corp, is manufacturing and selling a drug that infringes on Beta’s patented compound. In assessing the infringement, Beta's legal team focuses on 'literal construction' of the patent claims. Which of the following best describes this approach?
If a patent specification remains silent on a particular aspect of the invented technology, the 'doctrine of equivalents' can be invoked to extend patent protection to this unaddressed aspect even though it is not explicitly claimed.
If a patent specification remains silent on a particular aspect of the invented technology, the 'doctrine of equivalents' can be invoked to extend patent protection to this unaddressed aspect even though it is not explicitly claimed.
An applicant can request an early patent publication after __________ months.
An applicant can request an early patent publication after __________ months.
Explain the legal rationale behind the decision in Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies Pte Ltd, specifically focusing on the court’s stance on the doctrine of equivalents and how this aligns with the emphasis on purposive construction.
Explain the legal rationale behind the decision in Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies Pte Ltd, specifically focusing on the court’s stance on the doctrine of equivalents and how this aligns with the emphasis on purposive construction.
Which of the following best describes the main difference between applying to revoke a patent vs applying to re-examine a patent?
Which of the following best describes the main difference between applying to revoke a patent vs applying to re-examine a patent?
Because the application to re-examine a patent has an ex parte process, the applicant for re-examination can provide a comment on the patentee's response to written opinion.
Because the application to re-examine a patent has an ex parte process, the applicant for re-examination can provide a comment on the patentee's response to written opinion.
When a ground of revocation is established, but partially, the patentee may amend specification under Section __________ to the Registrar's satisfaction; if not, the patent will be revoked.
When a ground of revocation is established, but partially, the patentee may amend specification under Section __________ to the Registrar's satisfaction; if not, the patent will be revoked.
Describe what the process of revocation at IPOS involves.
Describe what the process of revocation at IPOS involves.
A team of research scientists discovers a novel biological phenomenon with potential applications in various industries. According to Section 16(1) of the Patents Act regarding industrial applicability, which of the following factors would be most critical in determining whether this discovery is patentable?
A team of research scientists discovers a novel biological phenomenon with potential applications in various industries. According to Section 16(1) of the Patents Act regarding industrial applicability, which of the following factors would be most critical in determining whether this discovery is patentable?
In Singapore, a method of treatment for a specific rare genetic disorder developed by a team of physicians is considered capable of industrial application under Section 16(2) of the Patents Act.
In Singapore, a method of treatment for a specific rare genetic disorder developed by a team of physicians is considered capable of industrial application under Section 16(2) of the Patents Act.
A multinational pharmaceutical corporation has developed a new compound that significantly enhances the efficacy of a surgical procedure. Under Section 16(3) of the Patents Act, what is the most accurate determination of whether this compound is capable of industrial application?
A multinational pharmaceutical corporation has developed a new compound that significantly enhances the efficacy of a surgical procedure. Under Section 16(3) of the Patents Act, what is the most accurate determination of whether this compound is capable of industrial application?
Under Section 25(4) of the Patents Act, the specification of a patent application must disclose the invention in a manner that is ______ for a person skilled in the art to perform.
Under Section 25(4) of the Patents Act, the specification of a patent application must disclose the invention in a manner that is ______ for a person skilled in the art to perform.
A patent specification is drafted in such a way that, while technically accurate, it uses highly convoluted language and obscure references, making it exceedingly difficult for a person skilled in the art to replicate the invention without undue experimentation. Considering the 'patent bargain' principle as articulated in Liardet v Johnson (1778), which of the following is the most likely outcome regarding the patent's validity?
A patent specification is drafted in such a way that, while technically accurate, it uses highly convoluted language and obscure references, making it exceedingly difficult for a person skilled in the art to replicate the invention without undue experimentation. Considering the 'patent bargain' principle as articulated in Liardet v Johnson (1778), which of the following is the most likely outcome regarding the patent's validity?
Outline the two-step test established in First Currency Choice Pte Ltd [2008] 1 SLR(R) 335 at [60]-[61] for assessing the sufficiency of a patent specification.
Outline the two-step test established in First Currency Choice Pte Ltd [2008] 1 SLR(R) 335 at [60]-[61] for assessing the sufficiency of a patent specification.
An inventor develops a device intended to disrupt wildlife migration patterns within a protected ecological zone via high frequency bursts. According to Section 13(2) and (3) of the Patents Act, which of the following considerations would the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore most likely take into account when determining the patentability of this invention?
An inventor develops a device intended to disrupt wildlife migration patterns within a protected ecological zone via high frequency bursts. According to Section 13(2) and (3) of the Patents Act, which of the following considerations would the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore most likely take into account when determining the patentability of this invention?
Match each stage of the patent application process with its primary objective:
Match each stage of the patent application process with its primary objective:
In Singapore, according to Section 27(2) of the Patents Act, an applicant is prohibited from requesting early publication of their patent application in order to expedite the grant of the patent.
In Singapore, according to Section 27(2) of the Patents Act, an applicant is prohibited from requesting early publication of their patent application in order to expedite the grant of the patent.
If a patent proprietor fails to pay the annual renewal fees after the 4th year from the date of filing the patent application, as per Patents Rule 51(1), what is the most immediate consequence?
If a patent proprietor fails to pay the annual renewal fees after the 4th year from the date of filing the patent application, as per Patents Rule 51(1), what is the most immediate consequence?
Flashcards
Industrial Applicability
Industrial Applicability
Patent protection applies to inventions, not discoveries. Subject matter capable of industrial application suggests it's more than a discovery.
Sufficiency (Patents)
Sufficiency (Patents)
Invention specification must clearly enable a skilled person to perform it.
The Patent Bargain
The Patent Bargain
Patent system aims to incentivise inventions, ensuring public benefits after patent term.
Sufficiency Test
Sufficiency Test
Signup and view all the flashcards
Offensive Inventions
Offensive Inventions
Signup and view all the flashcards
Patent Application Process
Patent Application Process
Signup and view all the flashcards
Priority Date
Priority Date
Signup and view all the flashcards
Patent Publication
Patent Publication
Signup and view all the flashcards
Patent Term
Patent Term
Signup and view all the flashcards
Pre-Filing Considerations
Pre-Filing Considerations
Signup and view all the flashcards
Grace Period (Patents)
Grace Period (Patents)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Employee Invention Ownership
Employee Invention Ownership
Signup and view all the flashcards
IP Due Diligence
IP Due Diligence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Infringing a Product Patent
Infringing a Product Patent
Signup and view all the flashcards
Patent Protection Extent
Patent Protection Extent
Signup and view all the flashcards
Purposive Construction
Purposive Construction
Signup and view all the flashcards
Doctrine of Equivalents
Doctrine of Equivalents
Signup and view all the flashcards
Patent Infringement defense
Patent Infringement defense
Signup and view all the flashcards
Restrictions on Relief - Patent
Restrictions on Relief - Patent
Signup and view all the flashcards
Grounds for Revocation
Grounds for Revocation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Revocation at IPOS
Revocation at IPOS
Signup and view all the flashcards
Effect of Revocation
Effect of Revocation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Industrial Applicability
- Patent protection applies to inventions, distinguishing them from mere discoveries.
- An invention must be capable of industrial application
- Section 16(1) of the Patents Act states that an invention is considered industrially applicable if it can be made or used in any industry, including agriculture.
- Section 16(2) specifically excludes methods of treatment or diagnosis on the human or animal body from being considered industrially applicable, including surgery, therapy, and diagnosis.
- Section 16(3) clarifies that even if a product is intended for use in excluded methods of treatment or diagnosis, it can still be considered industrially applicable
Industrial Applicability Scenario
- A company develops a new surgical technique for repairing damaged ligaments. While the technique itself cannot be patented due to the exclusion of surgical methods, a specially designed surgical tool created specifically for this technique could potentially be patented because it is a product with industrial application beyond just the surgical procedure.
Sufficiency
- Section 25(4) of the Patents Act requires that the patent application clearly and completely disclose the invention in a manner that allows a person skilled in the art to perform it.
- The "patent bargain" entails specifying the invention in such a way that teaches an artist how to recreate it when the patent term expires, benefiting both the inventor during the term and the public afterward, as foundation of the modern patent law.
- The test for sufficiency is a factual question based on the invention's nature and the case's circumstances.
- The two-step test for sufficiency involves identifying the invention and what it enables a skilled person to do, then assessing whether the specification enables them to do it.
Sufficiency Scenario
- An inventor claims a new type of battery with enhanced energy density. The inventor must provide enough details on the materials used and the manufacturing process so that a battery engineer could reproduce the enhanced energy density.
Offensive or Immoral Behaviour
- Section 13(2) of the Patents Act states that an invention is not patentable if its publication or exploitation would encourage offensive, immoral, or anti-social behaviour.
- Section 13(3) clarifies that behaviour is not deemed offensive, immoral, or anti-social solely because it is prohibited by Singapore law.
Offensive or Immoral Behaviour Scenario
- Suppose an inventor creates a device which is designed to specifically disrupt banking systems across the globe, and it is argued that its publication would encourage unlawful activity. This invention might be considered unpatentable due to encouraging anti-social behavior.
Application and Grant Process
- The patent application process typically takes 2 to 4 years, depending on the invention's complexity and the examination process
Filing Date
- Section 26 of the Patents Act is a key component, as novelty and inventive step are assessed using the priority date, usually the filing date, guided by Section 17(1) along with Sections 14 and 15
- The priority date may predate the filing date given a priority claim, excluding prior art as per Section 17
Publication
- A patent application is typically published as soon as possible after 18 months from the filing or priority date, following Section 27 of the Patents Act and Patents Rule 29(1).
- An applicant can request early publication according to Section 27(2) of the Patents Act to expedite the patent grant.
- Publication can result in the loss of protection as confidential information while application forms become prior art, potentially worldwide
- An applicant can seek damages for patent infringement backdating to publication per Section 76 of the Patents Act
- Term of patent per Section 36(1) of the Patents Act, a granted patent is effective from the date of certificate issue until 20 years from filing.
- Patents Rule 51(1) details that keeping a patent active requires annual renewal fees starting from the end of the 4th year after filing, within a period close to each filing anniversary.
Pre-Filing Considerations
- Key considerations include disclosure of the invention, filing strategy, ownership, and IP due diligence.
- It is important to keep an invention confidential before filing to avoid pre-filing disclosures impacting novelty and inventive step.
- Legislative changes made in 2017 to Patents Act Section 14(4)(e) and Patents Rule 8 have expanded the grace period.
- A filing strategy should align with business goals and budget, impacting filing location and method.
Employee Inventions
- Section 49(1) determines that an invention made by an employee belongs to the employer if it was made in the course of their normal duties or specifically assigned duties, with reasonable expectation of invention
- If, because of the employee's duties' nature and specific responsibilities, they had a special obligation to further the employer's interests, the invention also belongs to the employer
- Section 50(1) states that provisions regarding employee inventions do not apply unless the employee was mainly employed in Singapore or their employment location couldn't be determined, but the employer had a Singapore business location
- Section 50 (4) states that the Act does not prevent agreements or contracts about invention rights
Employee Inventions Scenario
- Suppose an engineer is hired for research and development, and is assigned the specific task of improving battery longevity. Any invention or improvement in battery life resulting from their work is most likely the property of the company, due to the specific assignment.
- Suppose any employment contract specifies the ownership of inventions
IP Due Diligence
- Conducting due diligence before filing for a patent is useful to search patent and non-patent literature
Acts of Infringement
- Infringing a product patent includes making, disposing of, offering to dispose of, using, importing, or keeping the patented product, whether for disposal or otherwise.
- For a process patent, infringement includes using or offering the process for use and, concerning the product obtained from the process, disposing of, offering to dispose of, using, importing, or keeping it.
Claim Construction
- Claim construction involves literal construction and purposive approach.
Literal Construction
- Literal claim interpretation could be exploited by those seeking to bypass the patent monopoly by making minor variations
Purposive Approach
Purposive Approach
- Purposive assessment is what a person skilled would understand for patentee to have used the language of the claim so that fair protection applies to third parties, who need to rely on patent claims.
- The doctrine of equivalents covers substantially the same function, way, and results; rejected in Maka, but affirms the purposive test
Defences
- As per Section 66(1), a defence exists if the alleged infringement occurred when the patent was not in force; a counterclaim can argue for patent revocation.
- Section 66(2) defines defences such as acts done privately for noncommercial purposes or for experimentation
Defence Scenario
- Defences to patent infringement: Evidence demonstrates that the alleged infringing act was done for non-commercial, private purposes, such as a hobbyist experimenting at home.
Restrictions on Relief
- Section 69(1) limits remedies if the defendant was unaware of the patent's existence and had no reasonable basis to believe it existed.
- The burden of proof lies with the defendant to demonstrate they were unaware of the patent.
- Per Section 69(2), awareness can be shown if "patent" or "patented" accompanies the patent number. Example: "Singapore Patent No. xyzxyz".
Introduction to Revocation Proceedings
- Revocation can occur if a patent is cited against an applicant's own patent application, in response to a lawsuit for patent infringement, or if a patent blocks freedom to operate.
- Actions to to address these matters include applying to revoke a patent (examinable), applying for binding re-examination (non-examinable), or challenging validity by defence or counterclaim.
Revocation: Application vs Re-Examination
Feature | Revoke a Patent | Re-examine a Patent (non-examinable) |
---|---|---|
Basis | Section 80, Rules 80-84 | Section 38A, Rule 52A |
Filing | High Court or Registrar | Registrar |
Parties | Inter partes (both parties involved) | Ex parte (one-sided) |
Process | Both parties submit evidence, Court/Registrar decides | Applicant has no further role, between Registrar and patentee |
Outcome | Longer, more expensive | Shorter, less expensive but applicant cannot comment |
Grounds of Revocation
- According to Section 80(1), grounds for revocation include the invention not being patentable (e.g., not novel or inventive) or the patent being granted to an unentitled person.
Process of Revocation
- Procedure per Section 82(1)(d) and Rule 80: application, counter-statement, specification amendment, applicant evidence, proprietor evidence, and applicant reply.
Effect and Consequences of Revocation
- As per Section 80(5)(a), the revocation of a patent has serious consequences
- Per Section 80(5)(b), if it's partially invalid, the patentee can amend specification with approval
- By Section 80(7), revocation begins on grant day
Scenario
- A competitor successfully proves that a patented technology was already publicly disclosed before the patent application. If the effect of revocation means the original patent grant is voided; serious consequences for the patentee
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.