Parties to Crime: California Law

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

Under California law, which of the following actions would qualify someone as an accessory after the fact to a felony?

  • Planning the felony with the principal before the crime occurs, but being absent during the commission.
  • Providing false alibi testimony for a principal defendant, knowing they committed the felony. (correct)
  • Directly participating in the felony with the principal.
  • Unknowingly driving the getaway car for the principal.

According to People v. Beeman, what mental state must a person possess to be guilty of aiding and abetting a crime?

  • Knowledge that their actions might inadvertently assist the perpetrator.
  • Knowledge of the perpetrator's criminal purpose and the intent to encourage or facilitate the commission of the offense. (correct)
  • A desire to see the crime succeed, regardless of their own actions.
  • A general disregard for the law, even if they don't know about the specific crime.

In the context of vicarious liability, under what circumstance might a defendant be held liable for the death of an unintended victim during the commission of a crime, according to People v. Concha?

  • Only if the unintended victim was attempting to aid the intended victim.
  • If the defendant verbally encouraged the accomplice before the crime.
  • If the defendant or an accomplice, with the required mens rea, causes an unlawful death. (correct)
  • The defendant can never be held liable for the death of an unintended victim.

Which of the following is the most accurate definition of 'provocative act' in the context of homicide, as described in People v. Garcia?

<p>An act during the commission of a crime that provokes a lethal response from an intermediary, such as a police officer or victim, resulting in someone's death. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What level of culpability is required for a 'provocative act' to support a finding of implied malice, according to People v. Garcia?

<p>The provocative act must be the primary cause of the intervention; It must involve conscious disregard for human life, knowing the natural and probable consequences of the conduct is dangerous to human life and had a high degree of probability of resulting in death. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under what circumstance can a defendant be held liable for provocative act murder when the provocateur is the one who is killed?

<p>A defendant can never be liable for provocative act murder when the provocateur is the one killed. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the key element that distinguishes homicide from murder?

<p>Malice aforethought. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the current legal status of the 'year and a day rule' in California regarding homicide cases?

<p>Death beyond 3 years and a day creates rebuttable presumption that the killing was not criminal. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the impact of Keeler v. Superior Court on California Penal Code Section 187 regarding the definition of murder?

<p>It initially ruled that a fetus was not covered by PC 187, prompting the legislature to amend the code. The previous law was not applicable. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to People v. Davis, what is the significance of 'viability' in the context of PC 187 regarding the killing of a fetus?

<p>Viability is not an element of PC 187 regarding the killing of a fetus. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In legal terms, what does 'malice aforethought' generally refer to in the context of murder?

<p>Different types of malice: Intent to kill (Express malice) ; Intent to commit serious bodily injury (SBI); Depraved, abandoned, or malignant heart (depraved heart) (“implied malice”). (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to People v. Knoller, what specific awareness must a defendant have to establish implied malice?

<p>D’s subjective awareness that her conduct endangers the life of another; Conscious disregard for human life. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The felony murder rule is most accurately described by which of the following statements?

<p>Any killing during commission or attempted commission of felony is murder. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In California, under what circumstances does the felony murder rule automatically result in a first-degree murder charge?

<p>During certain crimes: arson, robbery, carjaking, certain sex crimes, burglary, mayhem, kidnappng, or train wreaking. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to People v. Acuna, what level of consideration is required for an action to meet the standard of 'deliberate' in the context of first-degree murder?

<p>The action must be carefully thought out and weighed, but can occur quickly. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which combination of factors constitutes the 'sufficiency of WDP evidence test' for proving willful, deliberate, and premeditated (WDP) murder?

<p>Planning activity, motive to kill, and manner of killing. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary factor that distinguishes manslaughter from murder?

<p>The presence or absence of malice. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following negates malice and could reduce a charge of murder to voluntary manslaughter?

<p>Heat of passion or imperfect self-defense. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to People v. Lee, what is required for an intentional killing to be reduced to voluntary manslaughter based on heat of passion?

<p>Objective (Reasonable person) and subjective (reasonable provocation). (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In People v. Berry, why did the appellate court find that the trial court erred in not instructing the jury on voluntary manslaughter?

<p>The evidence showed there had been multiple weeks of extreme taunts from the victim so the issue of cooling off should have been presented to the jury. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In People v. Flannel, what legal principle was applied regarding the defendant's belief in the need for self-defense?

<p>An honest but unreasonable belief in the need to defend negates malice, reduces 187 to vms. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

John is driving negligently and hits someone who dies as a result. What would the charge be?

<p>Involuntary manslaughter. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to People v. Oliver, what are the two ways in which involuntary manslaughter can be committed?

<p>Criminal negligence, or committing an unlawful act not amounting to a felony. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In State v. Chaney, what level of deviation from the standard of conduct is required to establish criminal negligence in a vehicular manslaughter case?

<p>A gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe in the same situation. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the distinction between 'reckless' behavior and 'criminal negligence' in the context of vehicular manslaughter, as explained in State v. Chaney?

<p>Reckless involves conscious disregard of a risk that conduct will cause such a result; Criminal negligence fails to be aware that the conduct will cause such a result. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A person is charged with aiding and abetting a robbery. Which of the following scenarios would most likely lead to a conviction?

<p>The person provided the robbers with a weapon, knowing they intended to use it for the robbery. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A group of individuals plans a burglary. During the burglary, one of the individuals unexpectedly shoots and kills the homeowner. Which charge would the other participants most likely face?

<p>Felony murder. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

During an argument, Person A pushes Person B. Person B falls, hits their head, and dies. What factor would be most critical in determining if Person A will be charged with murder or manslaughter?

<p>Whether Person A intended to kill Person B or cause serious bodily harm. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A person is roped into a bank robbery. A person in the bank starts shooting and dies in the crossfire. How will the person be charged?

<p>Felony Murder. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Principal in the First Degree

The perpetrator of the crime; directly commits the criminal act.

Principal in the Second Degree

Someone who aids and abets the principal in the first degree during the commission of the crime.

Accessory Before the Fact

Someone who aids and abets the commission of a crime but is NOT present during the crime.

Accessory After the Fact

Someone who helps or harbors a principal, knowing they've committed a felony.

Signup and view all the flashcards

California Aiding and Abetting

Requires acting with knowledge of the perpetrator's criminal purpose and with the intent to encourage or facilitate the offense.

Signup and view all the flashcards

People v Concha

A defendant may be liable for the unlawful killing of both the intended victim and any unintended victims.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Provocative Act

Killing where, during the commission of a crime, an intermediary is provoked by a defendant’s conduct, resulting in someone’s death.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Implied Malice

Acting with conscious disregard for human life, aware of the dangerous consequences.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Murder

The unlawful killing of a human being or fetus with malice aforethought.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Homicide

Death at the hands of another.

Signup and view all the flashcards

People v Knoller - Implied Malice

Requires a defendant's subjective awareness that their conduct endangers another's life.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Felony Murder Rule

Any killing during the commission or attempted commission of a felony.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Premeditated

Considered beforehand.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Deliberate

Formed after careful thought, weighing pros and cons.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Voluntary Manslaughter (VMS)

Unlawful killing without malice.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Heat of Passion

Objective and subjective; reasonable person would be provoked.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Imperfect Self-Defense

An actual, subjective, but unreasonable belief in the need to defend negates malice.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Involuntary Manslaughter

Committed by criminal negligence or during a misdemeanor.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reckless/Criminal Negligence

Conscious disregard of risk or gross deviation from reasonable conduct.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Parties to Crime

  • Common law distinguishes between:
    • Principal in the first degree: the direct perpetrator of the crime
    • Principal in the second degree: one who aids and abets the commission of the crime
    • Accessory before the fact: one who aids and abets but is not present during the crime
    • Accessory after the fact: one who helps or harbors the principal, knowing they committed a felony
  • California law consolidates the first three common law categories into "Principals."
  • California defines an accessory as someone who:
    • Has knowledge that the principal committed a felony
    • Harbors, conceals, or aids the principal
    • Intends for the principal to avoid or escape arrest, trial, conviction, or punishment
  • Aiding and abetting in California includes all individuals who directly commit the crime, aid in its commission, or advise/encourage its commission even if not present.
  • To be guilty of aiding and abetting, one must act with:
    • Knowledge of the perpetrator's unlawful purpose
    • Intent or purpose to commit, encourage, or facilitate the crime
    • Actions or advice that aid, promote, encourage, or instigate the crime

Vicarious Liability

  • Generally, a defendant is guilty only if their criminal liability is based on voluntary conduct or a voluntary omission of which they are physically capable.
  • A defendant may be liable for the unlawful killing of both the intended victim and any unintended victim.
  • A defendant may be liable for murder if they have the required mens rea and either they or an accomplice causes an unlawful death.

Provocative Act

  • Involves a killing during the commission of a crime, where an intermediary (usually a cop or victim) is provoked by a defendant's conduct, resulting in someone's death.
  • The degree of murder depends on each individual defendant's mens rea.
  • This doctrine is invoked when a cop or victim kills a felon, not when the felon perpetrates the murder to begin with.
  • The provocative act must be sufficiently provocative to support a finding of implied malice.
  • Implied malice means acting with conscious disregard for human life, knowing the conduct's natural and probable consequences are dangerous and have a high probability of resulting in death.
  • The provocative act must be more than just mere participation in the crime.
  • A defendant is generally not liable for provocative act murder when the provocateur is the one killed; in that situation, the provocateur essentially caused his own death.

Crimes Against Life: Murder

  • Elements of murder include:
    • Unlawful killing of a human being or fetus
    • With malice aforethought
  • Malice can be:
    • Express (intent to kill)
    • Intent to cause serious bodily injury
    • Implied (conscious disregard for life)
  • Murder is any shortening of life
  • Homicide is death at the hands of another, but not all homicides are murder or manslaughter as defenses may exist.
  • California law states that death beyond three years and a day after the act creates a rebuttable presumption that the killing was not criminal.

Killing of a Fetus

  • Common law did not consider the killing of a fetus as homicide unless the fetus was born alive.
  • California initially did not include a fetus. However, the legislature amended PC 187 to include a fetus.
  • Viability, defined as the chances of survival, is not an element.

Malice Aforethought

  • Different types of malice include:
    • Intent to kill (express malice)
    • Intent to commit serious bodily injury (SBI)
    • Depraved, abandoned, or malignant heart (implied malice)
  • Implied malice requires a defendant's subjective awareness that their conduct endangers the life of another and a conscious disregard for human life.
  • It does not require awareness of a high probability of death or awareness of the risk of causing SBI.
  • Examples include shooting into a moving train, playing Russian roulette, driving under the influence, selling pure heroin resulting in an overdose, and severe child abuse.

Felony Murder Rule

  • Any killing during the commission or attempted commission of a felony can be considered murder.
  • In California, this applies to certain listed felonies.
  • This applies even if the killing is accidental or unintentional.
  • California felony murder is automatically first degree murder.
  • Applies to arson, rape, carjacking, robbery, burglary, mayhem, kidnapping, train wrecking, aggravated mayhem, certain sex crimes, or shooting from a vehicle at a person outside the vehicle with intent to kill.

Degrees of Murder According to California PC 189

  • First-degree murder includes:
    • Willful, deliberate, and premeditated (WDP) killing
    • Killing by certain methods (explosives, weapon of mass destruction, armor-piercing ammo, poison, lying in wait, torture, or drive-by shooting)
    • Killing during certain crimes (arson, robbery, carjacking, certain sex crimes, burglary, mayhem, kidnapping, or train wrecking)
  • Second-degree murder includes all other murders.
  • Willful, deliberate, and premeditated means:
    • Premeditated: Considered beforehand
    • Deliberate: Formed or arrived at as a result of careful thought and weighing of consideration for and against the proposed course of action. Can occur quickly.
  • Sufficiency of WDP evidence test:
    • Planning activity
    • Motive to kill, considering prior relationship
    • Manner of killing (may show preconceived design to kill)
  • A WDP will be upheld if all present; or strong evidence of planning; or motive plus either planing or manner of killing.

Manslaughter

  • Common law did not distinguish manslaughter.
  • It was developed later to delineate more heinous killings.
  • The dividing line from murder is malice, which can be negated by:
    • Heat of passion: Sufficient provocation to cause someone to act on impulse and not reflection
    • Imperfect self-defense: Honest but unreasonable belief in need to defend

Voluntary Manslaughter (VMS)

  • Voluntary manslaughter is an unlawful killing without malice and is considered a lesser included offense of murder.
  • An intentional killing is reduced to VMS if evidence negates malice, such as heat of passion or imperfect self-defense.
  • Provocation must be done by the victim or reasonably believed to have been done by the victim.
  • Heat of passion has both objective (reasonable person) and subjective (reasonable provocation) elements.
  • Provocation can occur over time, even with a cooling-off period, if another act serves as the final straw.
  • Can be any violent, intense, high-wrought, or enthusiastic emotion

Imperfect Self-Defense

  • D holds an actual subjective belief in the need to defend.
  • Even if unreasonable, it negates malice and reduces 187 to VMS.
  • If belief is both honest and reasonable, it constitutes a complete defense (not guilty).

Involuntary Manslaughter

  • Involuntary manslaughter occurs in two ways:
    • Criminal negligence by creating a highly unreasonable risk of death that kills the victim
    • Committing a misdemeanor resulting in death (committing an unlawful act not amounting to a felony)

Vehicular MS

  • Requires recklessness or criminal negligence.
  • Reckless conduct involves a conscious disregard of a risk that conduct will cause such a result.
  • Criminal negligence involves a failure to be aware that the conduct will cause such a result.
  • Both are a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe in the same situation.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser