Non-Fatal Offences in Criminal Law
45 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

The majority of offences do not result in ______.

death

The law on non-fatal offences is contained in ______ (for assault and battery) but also the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAP Act).

common law

The ______ of assault is any act which causes the victim to apprehend the immediate infliction of violence.

actus reus

The Criminal Justice Act 1988 s.39 provides that assault is a ______ offence.

<p>summary</p> Signup and view all the answers

Assault has a maximum sentence of 6 months ______ or a fine.

<p>imprisonment</p> Signup and view all the answers

S.39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 provides that battery is a ______ offence.

<p>summary</p> Signup and view all the answers

Battery has a maximum sentence of six months' ______ or a fine.

<p>imprisonment</p> Signup and view all the answers

Though assault and battery are two separate and distinct offences they can sometimes be charged together as '______ assault'.

<p>common</p> Signup and view all the answers

The ______ of battery is the application of unlawful physical force on another.

<p>actus reus</p> Signup and view all the answers

In ______ v Wilcock, it was held that a certain amount of physical force happens in daily life.

<p>Collins</p> Signup and view all the answers

The case of ______ v ______ involved a defendant who made silent telephone calls to the victim.

<p>R</p> Signup and view all the answers

______ v ______ involved a defendant who sent threatening letters to the victim, even though they were not immediately threatening.

<p>Constanza</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Tuberville v ______, the defendant's words were meant to take away liability for an assault.

<p>Savage</p> Signup and view all the answers

In ______ v DPP, the defendant punched a woman, causing her to drop her baby. This was held to be indirect battery of the child.

<p>Haysted</p> Signup and view all the answers

In ______ v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, the force was applied indirectly by the car driving on to the officer's foot.

<p>Fagan</p> Signup and view all the answers

The case of ______ established that touching the hem of a girl's skirt was akin to touching her.

<p>Thomas</p> Signup and view all the answers

The ______ of battery is intention or subjective recklessness to apply unlawful force.

<p>mens rea</p> Signup and view all the answers

If someone is ______ from behind, this will still constitute battery.

<p>struck</p> Signup and view all the answers

The application of unlawful force, as described in the scenario, might be considered ______ because the defendant's actions could have been reasonably anticipated to result in the victim apprehending the immediate application of unlawful force.

<p>recklessness</p> Signup and view all the answers

The ______ is the guilty act or conduct element of an offense. In this scenario, the application of unlawful force would constitute the actus reus of battery.

<p>actus reus</p> Signup and view all the answers

In this case, [name of victim] apprehends the ______ infliction of force as (e.g. [name of defendant] [bring in facts e.g.threatens them with a knife, raises a fist to punch them, scares them by jumping out in front of them.....etc]).

<p>immediate</p> Signup and view all the answers

Unlike assault, a battery can be committed by ______ where there is a duty to act.

<p>omission</p> Signup and view all the answers

The defendant in this case might not have intended to cause the victim to apprehend the immediate application of unlawful force, but they could be said to have ______ the consequences of their actions.

<p>foreseen</p> Signup and view all the answers

The ______ of the victim apprehending force by the actions of the defendant is a crucial factor in establishing the element of assault.

<p>consequences</p> Signup and view all the answers

The ______ of assault, as defined in the case of R v Savage, Parmenter (1992), is that the defendant must have either intended to cause the victim to fear the infliction of immediate and unlawful force, or must have seen the risk that such fear would be created.

<p>mens rea</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of DPP v Santana Bermudez, the defendant was asked by a police officer searching him whether he had any 'needles or ______' on him.

<p>sharps</p> Signup and view all the answers

To establish the mens rea for battery, it is crucial to determine if the defendant intended to apply ______ on the victim.

<p>unlawful force</p> Signup and view all the answers

The force [______ or ______ not] been directly applied because......

<p>has</p> Signup and view all the answers

If the defendant's actions were considered ______, it could be argued that they did not intend to harm the victim, but they should have been aware of the possible consequences.

<p>reckless</p> Signup and view all the answers

In this case, [name of defendant] ______ to cause [name of victim] to fear the infliction of immediate and unlawful force.

<p>intended</p> Signup and view all the answers

The case of ______ confirms that the mens rea of battery is intention or subjective recklessness to apply unlawful force.

<p>R v Venna</p> Signup and view all the answers

Contrast this with assault where the victim must fear the ______ of unlawful force and so therefore must be aware of it.

<p>application</p> Signup and view all the answers

In order to prove a charge of GBH with intention under s.18, the prosecution must establish both the ______ reus and the mens rea of the offence.

<p>actus</p> Signup and view all the answers

The defendant's intent to cause serious harm is an example of ______ rea, while the act of causing the harm itself is the ______ reus.

<p>mens</p> Signup and view all the answers

A defendant may be found liable for GBH with intention even if they intended to cause harm to a different person, due to the principle of ______ malice.

<p>transferred</p> Signup and view all the answers

When considering defences to a charge of GBH with intention, the court may consider factors like intoxication, self-defence, ______ or automatism.

<p>insanity</p> Signup and view all the answers

In many cases, a plea bargain may be reached between the prosecution and the defendant, potentially resulting in a lesser charge or a reduced ______ .

<p>sentence</p> Signup and view all the answers

The key difference between s.20 and s.18 is that s.18 can only be proved with ______ (direct or oblique), whereas s.20 can be established with recklessness or intention to cause some harm.

<p>intention</p> Signup and view all the answers

The mens rea of s.18 has two aspects: First, the defendant must '______' wound or cause grievous bodily harm.

<p>maliciously</p> Signup and view all the answers

Secondly, the defendant must have specific ______ to either cause grievous bodily harm to the victim or to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer of any person.

<p>intent</p> Signup and view all the answers

S.18 is a specific ______ offence.

<p>intent</p> Signup and view all the answers

The mens rea of s.18 requires ______ to maliciously cause grievous bodily harm.

<p>intention</p> Signup and view all the answers

The mens rea of s. 18 has two aspects: First, the defendant must 'maliciously' wound or cause grievous bodily harm. Secondly, the defendant must have specific intent to either cause grievous bodily harm to the victim or to resist or prevent the ______ apprehension or detainer of any person.

<p>lawful</p> Signup and view all the answers

S.18 is a specific intent offence (as required by R v Belfon (1976)) and requires ______ to maliciously cause grievous bodily harm.

<p>intention</p> Signup and view all the answers

The mens rea of s.18 reflects the ______ of the injuries and culpability of the defendant.

<p>severity</p> Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person

  • Majority of offences do not result in death
  • 5 non-fatal offences against the person require consideration:
    • Assault (common law)
    • Battery (common law)
    • Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAP Act)

Assault

  • Actus Reus: Any act that causes the victim to apprehend the immediate infliction of violence. Examples include raising a fist, pointing a gun or threatening someone. It also includes silent telephone calls and threatening letters/ communications
  • Mens Rea: Intention to cause the victim to fear the immediate application of unlawful force, or recklessness as to the risk of that fear being created.
    • Subjective recklessness: The defendant foresaw the risk that the victim would fear the immediate application of unlawful force.

Battery

  • Actus Reus: Any unlawful application of physical force on another.
  • Includes a range of physical contact, even touch can amount to battery.
  • Mens Rea: Intention to apply unlawful physical force, or recklessness as to the risk of that force.

Actus Reus of Assault and Battery

  • Not always direct.
  • Can be indirect, e.g., as in Fagan where defendant drove car onto officer's foot.
  • Immediate threat is crucial for assault (Collins v Wilcock)
  • Physical contact of any kind can be judged as battery; for example, touching the hem of a girl's skirt was deemed to be battery in Thomas.

Mens Rea and Actus Reus (Assault and Battery)

  • Consider if there was an application of unlawful force
  • Determine if there was an intention to apply force
  • Assess whether an apprehension of immediate force (Assault) or the infliction of force (Battery) was reasonable

Charging Decisions

  • CPS charging standards aim for consistency
  • Defences (e.g., intoxication, automatism, self-defence) to be considered

S.47 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 - ABH

  • Offence to commit an assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH)
  • Means "to bring about or cause"
  • ABH can involve either assault or battery
  • Harm must be more than merely transient or trifling
  • Includes acts like cutting someone's hair, the definition of actual bodily harm.

S.20 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 - GBH

  • Maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm (GBH) or wounding a person
  • GBH: Really serious harm (DPP v Smith)
    • Can be proved by either inflicting grievous bodily harm or wounding a person

S.18 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 - GBH with intent

  • Intending to maliciously wound or cause grievous bodily harm (GBH)

Defences

  • Consider possible defences : intoxication, self-defence (ex. to avoid arrest), insanity, automatism, etc.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Description

This quiz covers the key concepts and legislation related to non-fatal offences in criminal law, specifically focusing on assault and battery. Test your knowledge on definitions, legal frameworks, and case law pertaining to these offences. Ideal for students studying criminal law or related disciplines.

More Like This

Non-Fatal Offences in Criminal Law
11 questions
Non-Fatal Offences: Assault Overview
62 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser