Miranda v. Arizona Case

The defense attorney did not object to the admission of the confession (correct)

The police officers obtained a written confession after subjecting Miranda to interrogation without informing him of his Fifth Amendment rights

Miranda specifically requested counsel during the interrogation

The police officers informed Miranda of his Fifth Amendment rights before the interrogation

Miranda confessed guilt willingly without any coercion from the police

The police officers followed all legal procedures during Miranda's interrogation

Miranda was fully informed of his constitutional rights during the interrogation

Miranda did not specifically request counsel during the interrogation (correct)

The confession was obtained through illegal means such as coercion or duress

Miranda was not properly advised of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation (correct)

The confession contradicted Miranda's previous statements to the police

The confession contained false information about the kidnapping and rape