Meta-analysis of Children's and Adults' Identification Abilities with Lineups

GutsyHoneysuckle avatar
GutsyHoneysuckle
·
·
Download

Start Quiz

Study Flashcards

10 Questions

What was the overall correct identification rate for human faces?

.23

According to Pozzulo and Lindsay (1998), what drives target-absent lineup decisions?

Cognitive and social processes

Why was it necessary to separate the data in order to test the study’s hypotheses?

To eliminate target specific peculiarities

What did Pozzulo and Lindsay find in their meta-analysis regarding children's identification abilities with lineups?

Children as young as 5-years produced comparable correct identification rates to adults when the target is among the photos presented

In what type of lineups were younger and older children more likely than adults to produce a higher false positive rate?

Target-absent lineups

What contributes to lineup identification accuracy?

Both social and cognitive factors

What was the correct identification rate for Dora-Target in the cartoon lineup for children?

0.97

In the human faces lineup, what was the false rejection rate for Female-Target for children?

0.21

Who showed a significantly higher correct identification rate for cartoon faces compared to human faces?

Children

What was the overall correct identification rate for human faces among adults?

.66

Explore the meta-analysis of children's and adults' identification abilities with lineups, examining the pattern in correct identification and false positive responding, and manipulating the familiarity of the target. The study also delves into the cognitive and social demands of the lineup task.

Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards

Convert your notes into interactive study material.

Get started for free
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser