Mathematical Induction: Proof Technique

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Prove, using mathematical induction, that for all $n ≥ 1$, the sum of the cubes of the first $n$ natural numbers is equal to $(n(n+1)/2)^2$.

Basis step: For $n=1$, $1^3 = (1(1+1)/2)^2 = 1$. Inductive hypothesis: Assume $\sum_{i=1}^{k} i^3 = (k(k+1)/2)^2$. Inductive step: Show $\sum_{i=1}^{k+1} i^3 = ((k+1)(k+2)/2)^2$. $\sum_{i=1}^{k+1} i^3 = (k(k+1)/2)^2 + (k+1)^3 = (k+1)^2[k^2/4 + k + 1] = (k+1)^2(k^2 + 4k + 4)/4 = ((k+1)(k+2)/2)^2$.

Use mathematical induction to prove that $n^3 - n$ is divisible by 3 for all integers $n ≥ 0$.

Basis step: For $n=0$, $0^3 - 0 = 0$, which is divisible by 3. Inductive hypothesis: Assume $k^3 - k$ is divisible by 3. Inductive step: Show $(k+1)^3 - (k+1)$ is divisible by 3. $(k+1)^3 - (k+1) = k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k + 1 - k - 1 = (k^3 - k) + 3(k^2 + k)$. Since $k^3 - k$ is divisible by 3 (by the inductive hypothesis) and $3(k^2 + k)$ is also divisible by 3, their sum is divisible by 3.

Prove by mathematical induction that for all $n ≥ 1$, $1/(12) + 1/(23) + ... + 1/(n(n+1)) = n/(n+1)$.

Basis step: For $n=1$, $1/(1*2) = 1/2 = 1/(1+1)$. Inductive hypothesis: Assume $\sum_{i=1}^{k} 1/(i(i+1)) = k/(k+1)$. Inductive step: Show $\sum_{i=1}^{k+1} 1/(i(i+1)) = (k+1)/(k+2)$. $\sum_{i=1}^{k+1} 1/(i(i+1)) = k/(k+1) + 1/((k+1)(k+2)) = [k(k+2) + 1]/((k+1)(k+2)) = (k^2 + 2k + 1)/((k+1)(k+2)) = (k+1)^2/((k+1)(k+2)) = (k+1)/(k+2)$.

Use mathematical induction to prove that for $n ≥ 5$, $2^n > n^2$.

<p>Basis step: For $n=5$, $2^5 = 32 &gt; 5^2 = 25$. Inductive hypothesis: Assume $2^k &gt; k^2$ for some $k ≥ 5$. Inductive step: Show $2^(k+1) &gt; (k+1)^2$. $2^(k+1) = 2 * 2^k &gt; 2 * k^2 = k^2 + k^2$. Since $k ≥ 5$, $k^2 &gt; 2k + 1$. Thus, $2^(k+1) &gt; k^2 + 2k + 1 = (k+1)^2$.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Prove that the recurrence relation $F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2)$ with $F(0) = 0$ and $F(1) = 1$ has the closed-form solution $F(n) = (φ^n - (-φ)^{-n}) / √5$, where $φ = (1 + √5) / 2$ (the golden ratio).

<p>Basis step: For $n=0$, $F(0) = (φ^0 - (-φ)^0) / √5 = (1 - 1) / √5 = 0$. For $n=1$, $F(1) = (φ - (-φ)^{-1}) / √5 = (φ + 1/φ) / √5 = ((1 + √5)/2 + 2/(1 + √5)) / √5 = ((1 + √5)/2 + (2(√5 - 1))/(5 - 1)) / √5 = √5/√5 = 1$. Inductive hypothesis: Assume the formula holds for all $i ≤ k$. Inductive step: Show it holds for $k+1$. $F(k+1) = F(k) + F(k-1) = (φ^k - (-φ)^{-k}) / √5 + (φ^(k-1) - (-φ)^(-(k-1))) / √5 = (φ^(k-1)(φ + 1) - (-φ)^(-(k+1))( (-φ)^2 + (-φ)) /√5$. Since $\phi + 1 = \phi^2$ and $(-φ)^2 - φ$ simplifies we eventually arrive at $(φ^(k+1) - (-φ)^(-(k+1))) / √5$.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Using mathematical induction, show that any set with $n$ elements has $2^n$ subsets.

<p>Basis step: For $n=0$, the set is empty ({}). The number of subsets is one: {}. Since $2^0 = 1$, the statement holds. Inductive hypothesis: Assume a set with $k$ elements has $2^k$ subsets. Inductive step: Consider a set with $k+1$ elements. We can create this set by starting with a set of $k$ elements and adding one new element, $x$. All subsets of the original set of $k$ elements are subsets of the new set. Also, for each subset of the original set, we can create a new subset by adding $x$ to it. This doubles the number of subsets. Therefore, a set with $k+1$ elements has $2 * 2^k = 2^(k+1)$ subsets.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Prove by mathematical induction that for all $n ≥ 1$, $1^2 + 3^2 + 5^2 + ... + (2n-1)^2 = n(2n-1)(2n+1)/3$.

<p>Basis step: For $n=1$, $1^2 = 1(2<em>1-1)(2</em>1+1)/3 = 1$. Inductive hypothesis: Assume $\sum_{i=1}^{k} (2i-1)^2 = k(2k-1)(2k+1)/3$. Inductive step: Show $\sum_{i=1}^{k+1} (2i-1)^2 = (k+1)(2(k+1)-1)(2(k+1)+1)/3$. $\sum_{i=1}^{k+1} (2i-1)^2 = k(2k-1)(2k+1)/3 + (2(k+1)-1)^2 = k(4k^2 - 1)/3 + (2k+1)^2 = (4k^3 - k + 12k^2 + 12k + 3)/3 = (4k^3 + 12k^2 + 11k + 3)/3 = (k+1)(2k+1)(2k+3)/3 = (k+1)(2(k+1)-1)(2(k+1)+1)/3$.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Define a sequence by $a_1 = 1$ and $a_{n+1} = 3a_n + 1$ for $n ≥ 1$. Prove, using mathematical induction, that $a_n = (3^n - 1) / 2$ for all $n ≥ 1$.

<p>Basis step: For $n=1$, $a_1 = (3^1 - 1) / 2 = 1$. Inductive hypothesis: Assume $a_k = (3^k - 1) / 2$. Inductive step: Show $a_{k+1} = (3^(k+1) - 1) / 2$. $a_{k+1} = 3a_k + 1 = 3((3^k - 1) / 2) + 1 = (3^(k+1) - 3) / 2 + 1 = (3^(k+1) - 3 + 2) / 2 = (3^(k+1) - 1) / 2$.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Prove, using strong induction, that every integer $n > 1$ can be written as a product of prime numbers. (Note: A single prime number is considered a product of prime numbers.)

<p>Basis step: For $n=2$, 2 is a prime number, so it can be written as a product of itself. Inductive hypothesis: Assume that all integers $2 ≤ j ≤ k$ can be written as a product of primes. Inductive step: Consider $k+1$. If $k+1$ is prime, then it is a product of primes. If $k+1$ is composite, then $k+1 = a<em>b$ where $1 &lt; a, b &lt; k+1$. Then $2 ≤ a, b ≤ k$, so by the inductive hypothesis, $a$ and $b$ can each be written as a product of primes. Therefore, $k+1 = a</em>b$ can be written as a product of primes as well.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Consider the Fibonacci sequence defined by $F_0 = 0$, $F_1 = 1$, and $F_n = F_{n-1} + F_{n-2}$ for $n ≥ 2$. Prove by induction that $\sum_{i=0}^{n} F_i^2 = F_n * F_{n+1}$ for all $n ≥ 0$.

<p>Basis step: For $n=0$, $\sum_{i=0}^{0} F_i^2= 0^2 = 0$. Also, $F_0<em>F_1 = 0 * 1 = 0$. Inductive hypothesis: Assume that $\sum_{i=0}^{k} F_i^2 = F_k * F_{k+1}$. Inductive step: Show $\sum_{i=0}^{k+1} F_i^2 = F_{k+1} * F_{k+2}$. $\sum_{i=0}^{k+1} F_i^2 = \sum_{i=0}^{k} F_i^2 + F_{k+1}^2 = F_k * F_{k+1} + F_{k+1}^2 = F_{k+1}</em>(F_k + F_{k+1}) = F_{k+1}*F_{k+2}$.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Mathematical Induction

A method of mathematical proof used to establish a statement for all natural numbers greater than or equal to some initial value.

Basis Step

Prove the statement is true for the initial value (usually n = 1).

Inductive Step

Assume the statement is true for an arbitrary natural number k (the inductive hypothesis), then prove it's true for k + 1.

Inductive Hypothesis

The assumption that P(k) is true for some arbitrary integer k greater than or equal to the initial value.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Conclusion (Induction)

State that by the principle of mathematical induction, P(n) is true for all integers n greater or equal to the initial value.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Strong Induction

Assume P(j) is true for all j from the base case up to k, and then prove P(k+1).

Signup and view all the flashcards

Multiple Base Cases

Prove multiple base cases to start the induction, often when dealing with recurrence relations.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Sequences and Series

Proving properties of sums, products, and other features of sequences using induction.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Algorithm Verification

Using induction to prove the correctness of algorithms, especially recursive algorithms.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Graph Theory

Properties of graphs and trees proven using induction on the number of vertices or edges.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

  • Mathematical induction is a method of mathematical proof used to establish a given statement for all natural numbers greater than or equal to some initial value.
  • It's a powerful technique for proving statements that hold for an infinite sequence of numbers.

The Principle of Mathematical Induction

  • Basis Step: Prove the statement is true for the initial value (usually n = 1).
  • Inductive Step: Assume the statement is true for an arbitrary natural number k (the inductive hypothesis). Then, prove that the statement is also true for k + 1.
  • Conclusion: If both the basis step and the inductive step are proven, the statement is true for all natural numbers greater than or equal to the initial value.

Steps for Proof by Mathematical Induction

  • State the proposition P(n) that you want to prove for all natural numbers n greater than or equal to some initial value.
  • Basis Step: Show that P(n) is true for the smallest relevant integer n (e.g., n = 1, n = 0, or another specified starting point). This involves direct substitution and verification.
  • Inductive Hypothesis: Assume that P(k) is true for some arbitrary integer k greater than or equal to the initial value. This is your assumption, not something you need to prove.
  • Inductive Step: Prove that if P(k) is true (the inductive hypothesis), then P(k + 1) is also true. This usually involves algebraic manipulation, logical reasoning, and using the inductive hypothesis.
  • Conclusion: State that by the principle of mathematical induction, P(n) is true for all integers n greater or equal to the initial value.

Example 1: Sum of First n Natural Numbers

  • Proposition P(n): 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n = n(n+1)/2
  • Basis Step (n = 1): 1 = 1(1+1)/2 = 1. The statement holds for n = 1.
  • Inductive Hypothesis: Assume 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + k = k(k+1)/2 for some integer k ≥ 1.
  • Inductive Step: Prove 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + (k+1) = (k+1)(k+2)/2
  • Starting with the left-hand side: 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + (k+1) = (1 + 2 + 3 + ... + k) + (k+1)
  • By the inductive hypothesis: k(k+1)/2 + (k+1)
  • Simplifying: [k(k+1) + 2(k+1)]/2 = (k+1)(k+2)/2
  • This matches the right-hand side, so the statement holds for k+1.
  • Conclusion: By the principle of mathematical induction, 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n = n(n+1)/2 for all integers n ≥ 1.

Example 2: Divisibility

  • Proposition P(n): 3^(2n) - 1 is divisible by 8 for all integers n ≥ 1.
  • Basis Step (n = 1): 3^(2*1) - 1 = 9 - 1 = 8, which is divisible by 8.
  • Inductive Hypothesis: Assume 3^(2k) - 1 is divisible by 8 for some integer k ≥ 1. This means 3^(2k) - 1 = 8m for some integer m.
  • Inductive Step: Prove 3^(2(k+1)) - 1 is divisible by 8.
  • 3^(2(k+1)) - 1 = 3^(2k+2) - 1 = 3^(2k) * 3^2 - 1 = 9 * 3^(2k) - 1
  • Rewrite: 9 * 3^(2k) - 1 = 9 * 3^(2k) - 9 + 8 = 9(3^(2k) - 1) + 8
  • By the inductive hypothesis, 3^(2k) - 1 = 8m, so: 9(8m) + 8 = 8(9m + 1)
  • Since 9m + 1 is an integer, 8(9m + 1) is divisible by 8.
  • Conclusion: By the principle of mathematical induction, 3^(2n) - 1 is divisible by 8 for all integers n ≥ 1.

Example 3: Inequality

  • Proposition P(n): 2^n > n for all integers n ≥ 1.
  • Basis Step (n = 1): 2^1 = 2 > 1. The statement holds for n = 1.
  • Inductive Hypothesis: Assume 2^k > k for some integer k ≥ 1.
  • Inductive Step: Prove 2^(k+1) > k+1.
  • Starting with the left-hand side: 2^(k+1) = 2 * 2^k
  • By the inductive hypothesis: 2 * 2^k > 2 * k
  • Since k ≥ 1, 2k = k + k ≥ k + 1
  • Therefore: 2^(k+1) > 2k ≥ k + 1
  • Thus, 2^(k+1) > k+1
  • Conclusion: By the principle of mathematical induction, 2^n > n for all integers n ≥ 1.

Common Mistakes

  • Forgetting the Basis Step: The inductive step only proves that if the statement is true for k, it’s also true for k+1. Without the basis step, you haven't shown it's true for any specific value.
  • Incorrectly Applying the Inductive Hypothesis: Make sure you are using the assumption P(k) is true correctly when proving P(k+1).
  • Circular Reasoning: Avoid proving P(k+1) by assuming P(k+1) is true. You must use the assumption that P(k) is true to prove P(k+1).
  • Not Specifying the Range: Clearly state the range of values for which the statement is claimed to be true (e.g., for all integers n ≥ 1).

Variations of Mathematical Induction

  • Induction Starting at a Different Integer: The base case doesn't always have to be n = 1. It can start at any integer (e.g., n = 0, n = 2, n = -1).
  • Strong Induction: In strong induction, you assume P(j) is true for all j from the base case up to k, and then prove P(k+1). This is useful when the truth of P(k+1) depends on the truth of multiple previous cases.
  • Induction with Multiple Base Cases: Sometimes, you need to prove multiple base cases to get the induction going, especially when dealing with recurrence relations.

Applications

  • Proving Properties of Sequences and Series: Sums, products, and other properties of sequences can often be proven using induction.
  • Algorithm Verification: Induction can be used to prove the correctness of algorithms, especially recursive algorithms.
  • Combinatorial Identities: Many combinatorial identities can be proven elegantly using induction.
  • Graph Theory: Properties of graphs and trees can be proven using induction on the number of vertices or edges.
  • Number Theory: Divisibility rules, properties of prime numbers, and other number-theoretic results can be proven using induction.

Tips for Success

  • Clearly state the proposition P(n) you are trying to prove.
  • Write out the basis step explicitly and verify the statement directly.
  • State the inductive hypothesis clearly.
  • Use the inductive hypothesis thoughtfully and correctly when proving the inductive step.
  • Simplify your algebra and logic carefully to avoid errors.
  • Write a clear and concise conclusion that summarizes your proof.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

More Like This

Mathematical Induction Explained
10 questions
Mathematical Induction Proofs
38 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser