Manipulation Safety and Anatomy Review
20 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What percentage of Cervical Arterial Dissection (CAD) cases, as reported by Thomas et al. (2015), involved minor mechanical trauma to the head or neck in the month preceding the event?

  • 25%
  • 71% (correct)
  • 90%
  • 57%
  • Individuals with Cervical Arterial Dissection (CAD) were found to be how many times more likely to have experienced trauma compared to a control group, according to the information presented?

  • 30 times
  • 60 times (correct)
  • 71 times
  • 16 times
  • According to the provided information, what is the most common adverse effect associated with spinal manipulation?

  • Nerve damage
  • Soft tissue injury (correct)
  • Fracture
  • Cervical Arterial Dissection
  • Cleland et al. (2009) reported that a certain percentage of patients experienced adverse effects after lumbar spine manipulation. What was the approximate percentage they reported?

    <p>25% (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Within what timeframe did the adverse effects reported by Cleland et al. (2009) following lumbar spine manipulation typically resolve?

    <p>Within 48 hours (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of data primarily informs the understanding of fracture risk associated with spinal manipulation, according to the provided text?

    <p>Mostly case studies or case series (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following conditions is mentioned as a contraindication for spinal manipulation due to fracture risk?

    <p>Osteoporosis/Osteopenia (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    When comparing different regions of the spine, which area is indicated as being subjected to less force during manipulation?

    <p>Cervical spine (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Taylor and Kerry's (2010) approach to risk assessment of the cervical spine is described as:

    <p>System based (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of Cervical Arterial Dissection (CAD), the acronym 'Ns and Ds' is associated with:

    <p>Red Flags (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is generally considered the primary safety concern regarding spinal manipulation?

    <p>Potential damage to vertebral and internal carotid arteries (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Symons et al (2002), what was the maximum percentage of strain increase observed in the vertebral artery during cervical High-Velocity Low-Amplitude Thrust (HVLAT) in cadavers?

    <p>6.2% (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Symons et al (2002) concluded that mechanical failure of a normal vertebral artery occurred at strain levels of:

    <p>139-162% greater than at rest (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the Cassidy et al (2009) study, what percentage of both stroke cases and control groups had seen a chiropractor within 30 days prior to a vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) stroke?

    <p>4% (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Cassidy et al (2009), which group showed a higher percentage of seeking care from a Primary Care Physician (PCP) within 30 days prior to a VBA stroke?

    <p>Stroke cases only (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Cassidy et al (2009) observed an increased association between chiropractic visits and stroke specifically in which age demographic?

    <p>Individuals under 45 years old (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What primary reason did Cassidy et al (2009) propose to explain the association between chiropractic or PCP visits and VBA stroke?

    <p>Patients with early symptoms of vertebral artery dissection seek care for head and neck pain. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes the nature of the studies by Whedon et al (2015) and Kosloff et al (2015) in relation to the findings of Cassidy et al (2009)?

    <p>They replicated the findings of Cassidy et al (2009) in different populations. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the provided information, what precedes more than 80% of Vertebrobasilar Artery (VBA) strokes related to vertebral artery dissection?

    <p>Severe headache and neck pain (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the next logical step in ensuring manipulation safety, following the understanding of research on potential risks?

    <p>To implement effective screening procedures. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Flashcards

    Cervical Artery Dissection (CAD)

    A tear in the inner lining of an artery in the neck, often caused by a minor injury.

    Vertebrobasilar Artery Dissection (VBA)

    A type of CAD where the vertebral artery is affected.

    Internal Carotid Artery Dissection (ICA)

    A type of CAD where the internal carotid artery is affected.

    Pattern of pain in CAD

    Pain in the head, face, neck, or jaw that is often a sign of a cervical artery dissection.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Red Flags in CAD

    Signs and symptoms that suggest a serious underlying condition, such as a cervical artery dissection.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    System-Based Approach to Cervical Spine Risk Assessment

    An approach to evaluating the risk of cervical spine manipulation based on a systematic review of the patient's history and physical exam.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Osteoporosis/Osteopenia

    A contraindication for cervical manipulation due to the increased risk of fracture in individuals with weakened bones.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Soft Tissue Injury

    The most common adverse effect of manipulation, typically temporary.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Manipulation Safety

    The question of whether the potential benefits of manipulation outweigh the potential risks.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Understanding the research on manipulation safety

    Evaluating the research on manipulation safety to make informed decisions about treatment.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Vertebral Artery Safety

    The study of the structure and function of the vertebral artery in relation to cervical manipulation.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    HVLAT (High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Thrust)

    A specific manual therapy technique that involves a high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust to a joint.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Cervical Range of Motion (ROM)

    The range of motion a joint can move through, usually measured in degrees.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Strain

    The amount of force exerted on a tissue, such as an artery, during stretching or manipulation.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Symons et al. (2002)

    A study that examined the strain on the vertebral artery in cadavers during cervical manipulation.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Cassidy et al. (2009)

    A study that investigated the association between chiropractic care and stroke.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Screening

    The process of identifying potential risks before a procedure, like cervical manipulation.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Vertebrobasilar Artery (VBA) Stroke

    A condition where a blood clot forms in an artery, often in the neck, and blocks blood flow to the brain.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Vertebral Artery Dissection

    The process of tearing or damage to a blood vessel wall, often the vertebral artery.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Replication

    A research study that confirms the findings of an earlier study, providing more confidence in the results.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Study Notes

    Manipulation Safety

    • Manipulation safety research is the focus of this presentation.
    • Potential risks include damage to vertebral and internal carotid arteries, fractures, and soft tissue damage.
    • The presentation questions whether manipulation is safe and whether the risks outweigh the benefits.
    • Research on manipulation safety is limited.
    • Studies are frequently case studies or case series.
    • A critical factor is osteoporosis/osteopenia, which is considered a contraindication for manipulation due to the increased fracture risk.

    Artery Safety

    • Cervical spine manipulation may increase strain on vertebral arteries.
    • Strain ranges from 1.2% to 12.5% for ROM and up to 6.2% for HVLAT, but these levels often don't disrupt healthy arteries.

    Anatomy Review

    • Images of the cervical spine and arteries are used to visualize the area.
    • The arrangement of arteries in the neck and relevant musculoskeletal structure is reviewed.

    Evidence from Studies

    • Symons et al (2002) studied cadavers and found minimal strain to vertebral arteries during cervical movements.
    • Strain in healthy arteries during high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust manipulation (HVLAT) were found to be low and unlikely to induce damage.
    • Cassidy et al (2009) reviewed stroke cases and controls to assess the correlation between chiropractic visits and stroke occurrences.
    • A statistically significant association existed between chiropractic visits within 30 days of stroke.
    • Those under 45 showed a stronger correlation than those over that age.

    Replication of Findings

    • Studies like Whedon et al (2015) and Kosloff et al (2015) replicated the findings on the aged Medicare population and similar results in US commercial and Medicare Advantage populations.

    Screening

    • Thorough history-taking is vital to screening for manipulation risks.
    • Thomas et al. (2015) studied 71% of cervical arterial dissection cases, finding prior trauma to the head or neck in a significant portion of cases.
    • Understanding the relevant pain patterns and red flags in cases of cervical artery dissection (CAD) is crucial for proper screening.

    Red Flags and Dissections

    • Table 1 lists classic signs and symptoms of vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) and associated neuroanatomy.
    • Table 2 outlines non-ischemic (local) and ischemic (cerebral or retinal) signs and symptoms potentially related to vertebral artery dissection (VAD).
    • Table 3 presents clinical features of internal carotid artery dissection (ICA) and associated potential symptoms preceding ischemia.

    Fracture Risk

    • Data on fracture risk from manipulation is limited, primarily based on case studies.
    • Osteoporosis/osteopenia makes manipulation a contraindication.
    • Specific spinal regions (cervical spine) may have a lower risk compared to other areas (thoracic or lumbar spine).
    • Different techniques lead to various forces.

    Soft Tissue Injury

    • Soft tissue injury is the most common adverse effect of manipulation, identified by some at 25% in Cleland et al (2009).
    • Limited data exists for soft tissue injury after manipulation.

    Overall Safety

    • The presenter poses the question of: Do risks outweigh the benefits?
    • Multiple studies show potential risks associated with manipulative procedures.
    • A thorough evaluation of these potential risks is essential to inform treatment decisions that consider benefit vs risk.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Description

    This quiz focuses on the safety of manipulation in relation to the cervical spine and arteries. It discusses potential risks, including strains on vertebral arteries and considerations for individuals with osteoporosis. Additionally, it reviews anatomical structures and relevant studies on manipulation safety.

    More Like This

    Cervical Spine Disorders Quiz
    5 questions
    Cervical Spine Disorders Quiz
    5 questions
    Cervical Spine Manipulation Quiz
    37 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser