Podcast
Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App
Questions and Answers
In LSAT Logical Reasoning, which of the following is a common flaw in reasoning?
In LSAT Logical Reasoning, which of the following is a common flaw in reasoning?
- Ad hominem
- Begging the question
- Appeal to ignorance
- Post hoc ergo propter hoc (correct)
In LSAT Logical Reasoning, which of the following is an accurate description of a necessary assumption?
In LSAT Logical Reasoning, which of the following is an accurate description of a necessary assumption?
- An assumption that strengthens the conclusion
- An assumption without which the argument falls apart (correct)
- An assumption that is not stated in the argument
- An assumption that weakens the argument
Which of the following is an example of a valid argument according to LSAT Logical Reasoning standards?
Which of the following is an example of a valid argument according to LSAT Logical Reasoning standards?
- If it is raining, then the ground is wet. The ground is wet. Therefore, it is raining. (correct)
- All birds can fly. Penguins are birds. Therefore, penguins can fly.
- Some mammals are herbivores. All rabbits are herbivores. Therefore, all rabbits are mammals.
- Some trees are evergreens. All evergreens are conifers. Therefore, some trees are conifers.
Flashcards are hidden until you start studying
