Logical Fallacies

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Explain how the "False Dilemma" fallacy limits the scope of potential solutions or outcomes in a discussion.

It presents a situation as having only two options when more possibilities exist, oversimplifying the issue and potentially leading to flawed conclusions.

How does the "Appeal to Ignorance" fallacy use a lack of evidence to support a claim, and why is this problematic?

It assumes a claim is true (or false) simply because it hasn't been proven otherwise. This is problematic because absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.

Describe the core issue with the "Slippery Slope" fallacy in terms of probability and logical connection.

It assumes that one event will inevitably lead to a series of increasingly negative outcomes without sufficient evidence, ignoring the possibility of intervention or differing probabilities at each step.

What makes a "Complex Question" a fallacy, and how does it steer the respondent towards a particular answer?

<p>It's fallacious because it includes a presupposition that the person being questioned is likely to disagree with. It steers the respondent by forcing them to implicitly confirm the unverified assumption within the question.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how the "Appeal to Force" fallacy undermines rational discussion and replaces it with coercion.

<p>It relies on threats or intimidation instead of logical reasoning to force acceptance of an argument, effectively ending any possibility of open dialogue or reasoned debate.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe the ethical issue at the heart of the "Appeal to Pity" fallacy.

<p>It is unethical because it attempts to manipulate emotions rather than provide rational justification for a claim, exploiting someone's sympathy to gain acceptance.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the "Appeal to Consequences" fallacy allow personal desires to interfere with objective evaluation of truth?

<p>It rejects a claim based on the unacceptability of its potential outcomes, rather than examining the evidence objectively. This allows wishful thinking to override rational assessment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how the "Bandwagon" fallacy substitutes popularity for validity in an argument.

<p>It argues that an idea is correct simply because many people believe it, ignoring the fact that widespread acceptance doesn't guarantee truth or acceptability.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What distinguishes the "Attacking the Person" (ad hominem) fallacy from legitimate criticism of someone's character?

<p>The fallacy attacks the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument’s logic or evidence. Legitimate criticism focuses on character traits relevant to the argument itself.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how the "Appeal to Authority" fallacy misuses expertise and why it's important to verify credentials.

<p>It cites a supposed authority figure who lacks relevant expertise to support a claim, misrepresenting their opinion as authoritative evidence. Verifying credentials is vital to ensure the authority consulted is a genuine expert.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the key difference between appeal to authority and anonymous authority?

<p>Appeal to authority mentions the authority used, where anonymous authority does not to confirm if the authority is an expert or not.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how the 'Post Hoc' fallacy can lead to superstitious beliefs and ineffective problem-solving.

<p>It assumes that because one event follows another, the first event caused the second, even without a logical connection. This leads to superstitious beliefs and basing solutions on coincidences rather than actual causes.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe how "False Analogy" distorts reasoning by creating inappropriate comparisons.

<p>It draws conclusions based on similarities between two things that are not sufficiently alike, ignoring relevant differences that undermine the comparison.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain the problem with using the fallacy of "accident" in practical decision-making.

<p>It ignores real-world exceptions and nuances, and relies on rigid application of general rules where they don't logically fit, leading to unintended and potentially harmful results.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How can "Hasty Generalization" lead to prejudice and unfair judgment ?

<p>It bases broad conclusions on limited or unrepresentative evidence, often leading to stereotypes and unfair judgments about groups of people.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how the "Wrong Direction" fallacy can hinder efforts to address social problems effectively.

<p>It identifies the effect as the cause and vice versa, misdirecting resources towards treating symptoms instead of addressing the actual root contributing to the issue.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Describe how identifying the "Complex Cause" fallacy can lead to a better understanding when exploring the root cause.

<p>It recognizes that events often have multiple causes, and that mistaking a time connection for a one cause leads to incomplete or inaccurate conclusions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how the "Irrelevant Conclusion" fallacy distracts from the central issue, and its impact.

<p>It does not address the issue in question. It changes the topic, appeals to emotion, or misses the point.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Illustrate how the "Straw Man" fallacy damages constructive dialogue and promotes misunderstanding.

<p>The Straw Man fallacy misrepresents someone's actual argument to more easily refute it, which prevents genuine engagement with their ideas and creates unnecessary conflict. By attacking a distorted version, it undermines the possibility of finding common ground or reaching a shared understanding.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is the fallacy "Affirming the Consequent" considered a formal logical error, and how does it lead to invalid conclusions?

<p>It mistakenly assumes that if the consequent (the 'then' part) of a conditional statement is true, the antecedent (the 'if' part) must also be true. This ignores the possibility that other factors could lead to the same consequent, resulting in invalid deductions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Explain how the fallacy of "Denying the Antecedent" violates the rules of logical inference and provides an example.

<p>The presence of the 'then' conclusion does not mean the absence of the 'if' premise means the conclusion is false. Example: &quot;If it barks, it is a dog. It doesn't bark, therefore, it's not a dog.&quot;</p> Signup and view all the answers

Provide an example and Explain the fallacy of "Inconsistency" in argumentation.

<p>Inconsistency is the contradiction of information in the argument. &quot;Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded.&quot; - Yogi Berra</p> Signup and view all the answers

Define what logical fallacies are.

<p>Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that are based on poor or faulty logic.</p> Signup and view all the answers

True or false: The formal argument of logical fallacies can cause you to gain credibility as a writer.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Fill in the blank: Logical fallacies are errors in ________ that are based on poor or faulty logic.

<p>Reasoning</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Logical Fallacies

Errors in reasoning based on poor or faulty logic, which undermine credibility in formal arguments.

False Dilemma

An argument that limits options to only two, disregarding other alternatives, creating a false choice.

Appeal to Ignorance

Assuming a claim is false because it hasn't been proven true, or true because it hasn't been proven false.

Slippery Slope

Assuming one event leads to a chain of increasingly negative outcomes, resulting in an extreme conclusion.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Complex Question

A question that includes an unverified assumption, which the person being questioned is likely to disagree with.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Appeal to Force

Using threats or intimidation to force someone to accept an argument.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Appeal to Pity

Convincing someone by making them feel sorry.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Appeal to Consequences

Arguing something can't be true because the consequences are unacceptable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Bandwagon

Accepting a claim because many people believe it, based on popularity.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Attacking the Person (Ad hominem)

Attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Appeal to Authority

Appealing to a supposed authority who isn't a true expert.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Anonymous Authority

Similar to Appeal to Authority but the authority in question is not named

Signup and view all the flashcards

Post Hoc

Assuming that because one event follows another, the first event caused the second.

Signup and view all the flashcards

False Analogy

Drawing a false conclusion by incorrectly comparing two dissimilar things.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Accident

Applying a general rule to a situation where exceptions clearly exist.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Hasty Generalization

Drawing a conclusion based on insufficient or non-representative evidence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Wrong Direction

Confusing the cause and effect.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Complex Cause

Mistaking a time connection for a cause-effect connection.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Irrelevant Conclusion

Presenting a sound argument that doesn't address the issue in question.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Straw Man

Misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Affirming the Consequent

An error in formal logic where if the consequent is said to be true, the antecedent is said to be true, as a result.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Denying the Antecedent

A fallacy in formal logic where if the antecedent is made not true, the consequent is not true.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Inconsistency

Making contradictory claims within the same argument.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

  • Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning based on poor or faulty logic.
  • Logical fallacies in formal arguments can damage a writer's credibility

False Dilemma

  • A false dilemma is an argument that assumes only two options or outcomes exist when there are more.
  • Example: Jack finished the exam early, so he either knew all the answers or none of them.
  • Example: Devote yourself to the company fully or quit.

Appeal to Ignorance

  • Appeal to Ignorance is believing a claim is false (or true) simply because it hasn't been proven otherwise.
  • Example: Scientists can't prove humans evolved, therefore the Genesis creation account is literally true.
  • Example: Fairies must live in the attic since nobody has proven they don't.

Slippery Slope

  • Slippery slope arguments assume one event will trigger a chain of events, leading to an extreme and undesirable conclusion.
  • Example: If Jack doesn't turn in his paper, he will fail, his GPA will suffer, he won't get into grad school, and he'll never achieve his dreams.
  • Example: School uniforms will cause less shopping at local clothing stores, which closes the stores and hurts the economy.

Complex Question

  • A complex question is a trick question that presupposes an unverified assumption the person being questioned is likely to disagree with.
  • Example: Asking someone, "Have you stopped cheating on tests?" presupposes they were cheating.
  • Example: The question "Have you stopped mistreating your pet?" implies the person was mistreating their pet.

Appeal to Force

  • Appeal to force is a logical fallacy where someone uses threats or intimidation.
  • Intimidation is used to force another party to drop their argument.
  • Example: If you don't support the tax reformation bill, your chances of re-election will be low.
  • Example: Be back by 6 pm - remember what happened last time you were out late.
  • Example: Agree with me or I'll beat you up.

Appeal to Pity

  • Appeal to pity is when you attempt to convince someone by making them feel sorry for a person or situation.
  • Example: A student asks for an A on a paper due to trouble they have been through, like a computer crash, noisy lab, and a traffic ticket.
  • Example: A student asks professor to raise their grade due to a terrible semester that included a broken car, stolen laptop, and a sick cat.

Appeal to Consequences

  • Appeal to consequences argues something can't be true because the consequences of it being a reality would be unacceptable.
  • Example: A patient says they can't have cancer because it would mean they won't see their kids get married.
  • Example: Someone doesn't believe in reincarnation because they don't want to come back as someone or something else.

Bandwagon

  • Bandwagon is claiming an idea should be accepted because many people believe it's true or favor it.
  • It describes believing something is true or acceptable only because it is popular.
  • Example: Cathy feels she needs to create a social media account because her friends have joined social media sites, even though she prefers face-to-face conversations.
  • Example: It is fine to wait until the last minute to write your paper because everyone does it.

Attacking the Person (Ad Hominem)

  • Attacking the person (Ad Hominem) means “against the man."
  • Ad Hominem is also known as name-calling or the personal attack fallacy.
  • This is attacking the person making the argument instead of the argument itself.
  • Example: "He's so evil that you can't believe anything he says."
  • Example: "You can't trust what he says about the economy, he lost his job last year."

Appeal to Authority

  • Appealing to authority inappropriately involves getting people to agree by citing a supposed authority who isn't really and expert.
  • It does not accurately cite a legitimate expert on the matter.
  • Example: Gun laws should be strict because actor Brad Pitt supports it.
  • Example: All carbs are bad because a nutritionist wrote a book saying they are.

Anonymous Authority

  • Anonymous authority is a type of appeal to authority where the authority in question isn't named.
  • The fallacy is common enough to warrant special mention.
  • Without a named authority, it's impossible to confirm if they are an expert.
  • Example: Experts agree that the best way to prevent nuclear war is to prepare for it.
  • Example: If you swallow gum it takes seven years to digest, so don't do it.

Post Hoc:

  • Post hoc is also described as the "too much of a coincidence" argument.
  • Post hoc is assuming that because one thing happened at the same time or right after another, the first caused the second.
  • Example: A tennis player eats chicken before a game and wins, so he eats chicken before every game.
  • Example: AIDS emerged when disco was popular, so disco caused AIDS.

False Analogy

  • False analogy is a fallacy that incorrectly compares two things in order to draw a false conclusion.
  • Example: Joan and Mary drive pickup trucks, and Joan is a teacher, so Mary must also be a teacher.
  • Example: Bananas and telephones are shaped to fit human hands, so bananas were created for humans.
  • Example: Addiction to drugs can ruin someone's life, so addiction to computer games can also ruin your life.

Accident

  • Accident applies a general rule to all situations, even when there are clear exceptions.
  • The fallacy is also known as destroying the exception, because the rule should not apply in an exceptional case.
  • Example: Taking a life is morally wrong, therefore termite control is a crime.
  • Example: All birds can fly; penguins are birds, so penguins can fly.

Hasty Generalization

  • Hasty generalization is an argument based on insufficient evidence.
  • It is often caused by a sample that is too small or not representative of the population.
  • Example: Jack was late to his first two meetings, so he must be chronically late.
  • Example: I felt sick after eating pizza twice, so something in Georgio's pizza must make me allergic.

Wrong Direction

  • Wrong direction occurs when two happenings occur together.
  • The real cause is mistaken for the effect and the effect is mistaken for the cause, reversing them.
  • Example: He was speeding because he got a ticket.
  • Example: Kids play video games, and video game make children violent.
  • Example: Cancer causes smoking.

Complex Cause

  • Complex cause is a fallacy that incorrectly assumes one event causes another.
  • This is a mistake of a time connection for a cause-effect connection.
  • Example: Every time I wash my car, it rains.
  • Example: The poor location of a bush, the driver was drunk and the pedestrian being drunk all led to the accident.
  • Example: People are afraid due to increased crime making break the law more.

Irrelevant conclusion

  • Irrelevant conclusion is an argument that may be logically valid, but fails to address the actual issue in question.
  • Example: The house across the street is for sale; the owners must have lost their money gambling
  • Example: Hippos are not dangerous because they are so calm and cute.

Straw Man

  • Straw man is a logical fallacy that misrepresents an opponent's argument or position.
  • The misrepresentation makes it easier to attack the position.
  • Example: Those who seek to abolish the death penalty are seeking to allow murderers to commit heinous crimes without consequence.
  • Example: When a teacher proposes more time on math exercises, a parent complains that the teacher doesn't care about reading and writing.

Affirming the Consequent

  • Formal logic error occurs if the consequent (result) is true then the antecedent (cause) is true.
  • Example: If taxes are lowered, I will have more money. I have more money, so taxes must have been lowered.
  • Example: If it rains, the game is canceled, so if the game is canceled it rained.
  • Example: If the phone is off, it will not ring, so if it will not ring then the phone is off.

Denying the Antecedent

  • Denying the antecedent is a fallacy in formal logic where the antecedent (the “if” part) is not true.
  • It wrongly concludes that the consequent (the "then" part) also cannot be true.
  • Example: If it barks, it is a dog. It doesn't bark, therefore, it's not a dog.
  • Example: If I study hard, I will pass the test. I didn't study hard, so I will fail the test.
  • Example: If someone is a professor, then they have a PhD. Maria is not a professor, so Maria does not have a PhD.

Inconsistency

  • Inconsistency happens when someone makes two claims in an argument that cannot both be true simultaneously.
  • It's a logical flaw presenting conflicting statements that undermines their argument.
  • Example: "Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded." - Yogi Berra
  • Example: "Everyone should speak their mind freely, but it's best to always keep your thoughts to yourself."
  • Example: "The government should not interfere in people's lives, but we need stricter laws against drug use."

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser