Responsibility for Damages

When two people went to sleep at the same time, and one turned over and injured the other or tore his garment.

If the person who came to lay down afterwards was injured, the person sleeping is not liable.

If the damage was done in a place belonging to the מזיק, he is not required to pay unless he purposely caused the damage.

<p>If both of them were in a place belonging to a third party with his permission, and one unintentionally damaged property belonging to the other, the person who caused the damage is not liable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>The person is not required to pay if the damage was done in a place belonging to the ניזק, unless he purposely caused the damage. If he caused the damage unintentionally or due to forces beyond his control, he is not liable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>The person is not liable for unintentionally damaging property belonging to another person when both of them were in a place belonging to a third party with his permission - or without his permission - and one unintentionally damaged property belonging to the other.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>The liability for causing damage in a place belonging to the מזיק does not apply unless the damage was caused purposely. If the damage was unintentional or due to forces beyond the person's control, he is not liable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

A person is not liable for damage caused while asleep unless they purposefully injured another or their property.

If someone is injured while trying to sleep next to another, the sleeping person is not held liable.

If damage is done in the owner's property, the owner is not liable unless they intended the outcome.

If damage occurs to a person in a space belonging to a third party but with permission, the causer isn't usually liable.

Damage caused to someone else's property is not automatically the responsibility of the person causing it.

Unless damaged intentionally, a person causing unintentional damage in a third party's space, with or without permission, isn't liable

Liability for uninvited damage to property only applies if the damage was caused intentionally.

Unintentional damage in a מזיק's space doesn't trigger liability; force majeure is also an exclusion

Damage in the ניזק's property, intentional damage results in liability; unintentional will not

Intentional damage in a third-party's property by the מזיק results in liability; unintentional, no responsibility.

The liability of sleep-related harm depends on the intent behind the action.

The liability for damage in another's property is not automatic; intent is critical.

Unintentional harm in a third-party's property, does not normally trigger liability.

Unintentional damage, except where intent is involved, does not result in liability.

Liability for unintentional damage in a place with permission is usually mitigated.

Unintentional damage in a shared space involving a third party, typically does not create responsibility.

Liability for damage can differ depending on whether the damaged property belongs to the owner or a third party.

If damage is caused by factors beyond a person's control, they are not liable.

Responsibility for damage to property depends on whether the damage was intentional or unintentional.

Unintentional damage done in another's property , without permission, usually does not create liability.