Labor Law Case: Demdex vs. Leron
40 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What must be shown to justify an employee's dismissal based on abandonment of work?

  • Poor job performance
  • Overt acts evidencing intention to sever the relationship (correct)
  • A formal resignation letter
  • Negative comments about the employer

    • Employee Rosalio A. Leron received standard benefits such as 13th month pay and holiday pay.

    False

    In what year was Rosalio A. Leron hired by Demex Rattancraft, Inc.?

    1980

    Who dismissed Leron from his position?

    <p>Marcelo Viray and Nora Francisco</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Demex Rattancraft, Inc. is engaged in the manufacturing of __________ products.

    <p>handcrafted rattan</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What item did Leron weave that was later rejected for export to Japan?

    <p>dining chair</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Leron was paid on an hourly basis for his work at Demex.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following individuals to their roles in the case:

    <p>Demex Rattancraft, Inc. = Petitioners Narciso T. Dela Merced = President of Demex Rosalio A. Leron = Respondent Marcelo Viray = Foreman who dismissed Leron</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a cause for termination of employment?

    <p>Employee's personal opinion</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Abandonment of work is expressly listed as a just cause for termination under Article 297 of the Labor Code.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What two elements must be present to justify dismissal on the ground of abandonment of work?

    <p>Absence without valid reason and clear intention to sever the employer-employee relationship.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A clear and deliberate intent to discontinue one's employment is known as _______.

    <p>abandonment</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following grounds for termination with their descriptions:

    <p>Serious misconduct = Willful disobedience to lawful orders Gross neglect = Habitual failure to perform duties Fraud = Breach of trust reposed by the employer Commission of a crime = Offense against the employer or their family</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following must the employer provide to support a claim of abandonment?

    <p>Evidence of deliberate refusal to return to work</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Mere failure to report for work is sufficient to support a charge of abandonment.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What evidence did the National Labor Relations Commission rely on to uphold the dismissal?

    <p>Sinumpaang Salaysay, return-to-work notices, and termination notice.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Abandonment of work directly ends the employer-employee relationship.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is required for a valid termination of employment?

    <p>The employer must provide an initial notice stating the grounds for dismissal.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must an employer provide after considering the employee's written explanation?

    <p>Another notice informing the employee of the findings and reasons for termination.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    For a dismissal to be valid, the employer must send the employee an initial notice of ______.

    <p>specific grounds</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the terms related to employment termination with their definitions:

    <p>Initial Notice = Notice informing specific grounds for dismissal Just Cause = Legitimate reason for termination Dismissal = Formal termination of employment Neglect of Duty = Failure to perform job responsibilities</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the employer's burden regarding dismissal?

    <p>To prove that the dismissal was for a just or authorized cause.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the finding that the respondent was illegally dismissed from employment.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the employer need to demonstrate to legally terminate an employee for abandonment?

    <p>Clear proof of abandonment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Who is the Chief Justice mentioned in the certification?

    <p>Maria Lourdes P.A. Sereno</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The conclusions in the Decision were made after the case was assigned to the writer.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What position does Presbitero J. Velasco, Jr. hold?

    <p>Associate Justice</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Resolution dated January 30, 2009 was penned by Commissioner __________.

    <p>Pablo C. Espiritu, Jr.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following justices with their roles:

    <p>Maria Lourdes P.A. Sereno = Chief Justice Presbitero J. Velasco, Jr. = Associate Justice, Chairperson Noel G. Tijam = Associate Justice Romeo F. Barza = Associate Justice</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which division was the Resolution penned by Commissioner Pablo C. Espiritu, Jr. part of?

    <p>Third Division</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Decision was concurred in by Associate Justices Edwin D. Sorongon and Romeo F. Barza.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How many pages were indicated for the Rollo in footnote 1?

    <p>Page 7-29</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case was decided on January 11, 2016?

    <p>Pascual v. Burgos</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Labor Arbiter Decision mentioned a date of July 7, 2006.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Name one case cited by the citation in the text.

    <p>Medina v. Asistio, Jr.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The case of _______ involves the National Labor Relations Commission and was ruled in 1999.

    <p>Pare v. National Labor Relations Commission</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following cases with their respective judges:

    <p>Pascual v. Burgos = J. Leonen Stanley Fine Furniture v. Gallano = J. Leonen Pare v. National Labor Relations Commission = J. Bellosillo Karns International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Commission = J. Bellosillo</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the citation for the case involving Karns International, Inc.?

    <p>373 Phil. 950 (1999)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Flores v. Nuestro was decided by J. Yap.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What citation is associated with the case of Capital Garment Corporation?

    <p>202 Phil. 797 (1982)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Case Summary

    • Demdex Rattancraft, Inc. (Demex) dismissed Rosalio A. Leron (Leron) from their service in 2006
    • Leron was a weaver for Demex since 1980
    • Demex claimed Leron was dismissed for abandonment of work
    • The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) upheld the dismissal
    • The Court of Appeals reversed the NLRC’s decision and reinstated Leron

    Abandonment of Work

    • To prove abandonment of work, the employer must show clear evidence of the employee’s intent to sever the employer-employee relationship
    • Mere failure to report to work is insufficient to establish abandonment
    • The employer must show the employee’s deliberate refusal to return to work

    Demdex's Case

    • Demex failed to establish Leron's intent to abandon his job
    • Demex based their claim on failure to report to work with no other specific evidence
    • Demex did not provide Leron with a chance to provide a written explanation

    Due Process

    • Demex violated the twin-notice rule
    • Demex should have given Leron two notices, one specifying the charges and one stating the decision after Leron’s response
    • The dismissal notice is the operative act that terminates an employer-employee relationship

    Burden of Proof

    • The employer, in this case, Demex, bears the burden of proving the validity of the dismissal

    Conclusion

    • The Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals’ decision
    • Leron was illegally dismissed
    • Demex was required to reinstate Leron and pay his back wages

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    G.R. No. 204288 PDF

    Description

    This quiz covers the labor law case involving Demdex Rattancraft, Inc. and Rosalio A. Leron, focusing on the grounds for dismissal and the concept of abandonment of work. Learn about the legal principles of due process and the obligations of employers in proving abandonment. Test your understanding of the decision made by the Court of Appeals in this case.

    More Like This

    Labor Law: Employment Rights and Practices
    8 questions

    Labor Law: Employment Rights and Practices

    EngrossingToad avatar
    EngrossingToad
    Labour Law Case Studies Quiz
    10 questions

    Labour Law Case Studies Quiz

    CheeryAbstractArt avatar
    CheeryAbstractArt
    Labor Law Compliance Quiz
    40 questions

    Labor Law Compliance Quiz

    SplendidAntagonist avatar
    SplendidAntagonist
    Demex Rattancraft vs. Leron Case Overview
    6 questions

    Demex Rattancraft vs. Leron Case Overview

    PeerlessDubnium2027 avatar
    PeerlessDubnium2027
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser