Podcast
Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Questions and Answers
Why would those who think non-rational beings have moral worth of their own disagree with Kant?
Why would those who think non-rational beings have moral worth of their own disagree with Kant?
- Kant believed that non-rational beings have equal moral worth as rational beings
- Kant considered non-rational beings superior in moral worth
- Kant believed that only rational beings have moral worth (correct)
- Kant's philosophy did not address the moral worth of non-rational beings
Why would someone who believes in the moral worth of non-rational beings likely have a different view from Kant?
Why would someone who believes in the moral worth of non-rational beings likely have a different view from Kant?
- They may agree with Kant's philosophy on moral worth
- They may think Kant's views on moral worth are irrelevant
- They may believe that all beings, rational or non-rational, have inherent moral worth (correct)
- They may believe that non-rational beings have no moral worth
How does Kant's view on moral worth differ from those who think non-rational beings have moral worth of their own?
How does Kant's view on moral worth differ from those who think non-rational beings have moral worth of their own?
- Kant considered non-rational beings superior in moral worth
- Kant believed that moral worth is independent of rationality
- Kant believed that only rational beings possess moral worth (correct)
- Kant's philosophy did not address the concept of moral worth
Flashcards are hidden until you start studying
