Podcast
Questions and Answers
According to the principle of 'Ought implies Can', what is a necessary condition for having a moral obligation?
According to the principle of 'Ought implies Can', what is a necessary condition for having a moral obligation?
- Having the ability or freedom to perform the action (correct)
- Being in a position of authority or power
- Believing that the action is ethically correct
- Having a strong sense of duty or responsibility
If a person is physically unable to perform a certain action, according to the 'Ought implies Can' principle, can they be morally obligated to do it?
If a person is physically unable to perform a certain action, according to the 'Ought implies Can' principle, can they be morally obligated to do it?
- No, because they lack the ability to perform the action (correct)
- Yes, if they have a strong sense of duty or responsibility
- Yes, as long as they believe it is the right thing to do
- No, unless they are in a position of authority or power
According to Joseph Fletcher's interpretation of the 'Ought implies Can' principle, what determines our moral obligations?
According to Joseph Fletcher's interpretation of the 'Ought implies Can' principle, what determines our moral obligations?
- The potential consequences of our actions
- Our current circumstances and capabilities (correct)
- The universal moral laws or ethical principles
- Our position in society or authority over others
According to Hornedo's perspective on freedom and responsibility, what is the essence of freedom connected to?
According to Hornedo's perspective on freedom and responsibility, what is the essence of freedom connected to?
Based on the 'Ought implies Can' principle, if a person lies due to coercion or fear for their safety, can they be held morally responsible for lying?
Based on the 'Ought implies Can' principle, if a person lies due to coercion or fear for their safety, can they be held morally responsible for lying?