Recent Lessons

Show all results for ""

Feature Overview

Ace your exams with our all-in-one platform for creating and sharing quizzes and tests.

Quizzes

Create quizzes and tests automatically from your content using AI.

Flashcards

Automatically turn your notes into digital flashcards.

Share, Export & Embed

Share with classmates or export to Excel and your learning management system.

Stats & Reporting

Auto-grading quizzes and tests with detailed stats and reports.

Mobile Apps

The smarter way to study – wherever you are.

Pricing

Search...

5 Questions

0 Views

Kantian Ethics and Duty-based Approach

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz

Study Flashcards

Spaced Repetition

Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

According to the principle of 'Ought implies Can', what is a necessary condition for having a moral obligation?

Having the ability or freedom to perform the action (correct)

Being in a position of authority or power

Believing that the action is ethically correct

Having a strong sense of duty or responsibility

If a person is physically unable to perform a certain action, according to the 'Ought implies Can' principle, can they be morally obligated to do it?

No, because they lack the ability to perform the action (correct)

Yes, if they have a strong sense of duty or responsibility

Yes, as long as they believe it is the right thing to do

No, unless they are in a position of authority or power

According to Joseph Fletcher's interpretation of the 'Ought implies Can' principle, what determines our moral obligations?

The potential consequences of our actions

Our current circumstances and capabilities (correct)

The universal moral laws or ethical principles

Our position in society or authority over others

According to Hornedo's perspective on freedom and responsibility, what is the essence of freedom connected to?

<p>Our energy and inner strength</p> Signup and view all the answers

Based on the 'Ought implies Can' principle, if a person lies due to coercion or fear for their safety, can they be held morally responsible for lying?

<p>No, because they did not have the freedom to act otherwise</p> Signup and view all the answers

Kantian Ethics and Duty-based Approach

Choose a study mode

Podcast

Questions and Answers

According to the principle of 'Ought implies Can', what is a necessary condition for having a moral obligation?

If a person is physically unable to perform a certain action, according to the 'Ought implies Can' principle, can they be morally obligated to do it?

According to Joseph Fletcher's interpretation of the 'Ought implies Can' principle, what determines our moral obligations?

According to Hornedo's perspective on freedom and responsibility, what is the essence of freedom connected to?

Based on the 'Ought implies Can' principle, if a person lies due to coercion or fear for their safety, can they be held morally responsible for lying?

More Like This

Kantian Ethics vs

Kantian Ethics Overview

Kantian Deontological Ethics Flashcards

Upgrade to continue