Jury Selection and Analysis
10 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Who advocated for an applied psychological approach to practical life issues, including law?

  • Louis Brandeis
  • Roscoe Pound
  • Social Psychologists
  • Hugo Munsterberg (correct)
  • During which century did legal scholars like Louis Brandeis and Roscoe Pound support the use of social science evidence in legal proceedings?

  • 21st century
  • Late 20th century
  • Mid 19th century
  • Early 20th century (correct)
  • What is a key aspect of courtroom dynamics that social psychologists have contributed to?

  • Jury Instruction
  • Change of Venue
  • Extra-evidential Factors
  • All of the above (correct)
  • What is an example of a realistic jurisprudence approach to law?

    <p>Use of social science evidence in legal proceedings</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a factor that social psychologists examine in the context of jury selection?

    <p>All of the above</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is an example of an extra-evidential factor that affects juror decision-making?

    <p>Prejudice and discrimination</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the focus of the chapter's discussion of expert testimony?

    <p>Its impact on attitude change and persuasion in jurors</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the main contribution of social psychologists in the legal field?

    <p>Contributing to various aspects of courtroom dynamics</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a key issue discussed in the chapter regarding jury size and composition?

    <p>The effect of conformity and group decision-making</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the chapter's main focus regarding the integration of psychology and law?

    <p>The application of social psychology in courtroom procedures</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Jury Size and Selection

    • Historically, juries composed of 12 individuals, but research indicates 6-member juries can provide unbiased decisions
    • US courts allow 6-member juries for civil cases and all criminal trials except capital trials
    • Challenges in jury selection include ensuring a representative cross-section of the community and identifying potential biases

    Psychological Aspects of Jury Decision Making

    • Research on jury size (6 vs 12) indicates 12-member juries are less likely to provide biased decisions
    • Consensus bias and social pressure can influence jury decisions
    • Psychological factors influencing jury decisions include race, culture, gender, socioeconomic status, political beliefs, social media, attitudes, and cognitive factors

    Jury Selection Process

    • Venire process involves identifying potential jurors, notification, and creation of a jury pool
    • Challenges for cause and peremptory challenges are used to remove biased jurors
    • The Victorian model assumes potential jurors can identify their biases, while the US model assumes they cannot
    • The legal process involves witnesses, testimony, exhibits, opening/closing statements, and judicial instructions
    • Social cognition models apply to jury decision making, including input biases, processing biases, and output biases
    • Jury decision making areas include attributions of causality, actor/observer bias, and the fundamental attribution error

    Attorney Tactics and Expert Evidence

    • Attorneys use tactics like vivid language, repetition, loaded questions, and definitional tactics to influence jurors
    • Expert evidence involves qualification of witnesses, admissibility of evidence, and scientific acceptance of information presented
    • Legal standards for expert evidence include the three-part test: subject matter, witness qualification, and scientific acceptance

    Insanity and Sentencing

    • Legal standard for insanity involves a defect of reason from a disease of the mind, lack of knowledge of the nature and quality of the act, and an inquiry to determine whether the defendant knew what they were doing was wrong
    • Modern legal versions of insanity include the defendant lacking substantial capacity to know what they are doing is wrong
    • Focal concern theory of sentencing involves considering defendant culpability, protection of the community, and practical constraints and consequences of the sentence

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    This quiz covers the process of selecting a jury, including reliable sampling methods, questioning techniques, and analysis of data. It also explores the presentation of evidence in court.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser