Intrinsical vs Instrumental Egalitarianism

A state where something is no longer useful or used, often replaced by something newer and more efficient.

The idea that humans may become less relevant or useful in the face of advanced AI and automation.

The current geological epoch characterized by human influence dominating the planet and its resources.

The hypothetical future geological epoch where AI and automation become dominant forces on Earth.

The transition from a human-dominated era to an era where AI and automation become the primary drivers of change.

The technological advancements that have given humans immense power over the Earth are also driving their potential obsolescence.

The potential for AI and automation to replace human roles, making human contributions redundant and obsolete.

The idea that AI and automation, despite their potential benefits, could lead to humans losing control over the fate of the planet and their species.

A concept describing the idea that modern societies are characterized by the loss of magic and mystery, with rational thought prevailing.

A concept referring to the opposite of disenchantment, where awe, wonder, and mystery still hold power over our understanding.

A discourse that emphasizes the inevitability of AI's development and its potential to automate and replace human jobs, creating a sense of impending obsolescence.

A discourse that portrays AI as a mystical, almost magical entity with inherent power, often citing accuracy rates as evidence of its superiority.

The idea that AI systems are disembodied, independent entities that acquire knowledge separate from their creators, disregarding the human context and biases involved in their development and applications. This view separates the machine from its users and creators, leading to the illusion of objective, unbiased AI.

The potential for AI systems, particularly deep learning, to reproduce and amplify existing biases and discrimination in society when applied to human interactions and decision-making processes.

The inherent risk of the automation-obsolescence and enchanted-determinism discourses, leading to a distorted understanding of AI and its potential consequences.

The need to challenge the simplistic narratives surrounding AI, acknowledging its limitations, and recognizing the complexities of human interaction with technology.

The concept that all individuals possess inherent worth and deserve equal respect and dignity, regardless of their differences.

The philosophical idea that all human beings are, by nature, equal in their rights and freedoms. This is the foundation for many modern ideas about justice and equality.

The historical understanding that humans are inherently unequal, based on notions of social hierarchy or divinely ordained differences.

The philosophical school that emphasized the inherent equality of all rational beings, asserting the shared capacity for reason and moral action.

A philosophical theory that proposes that the state of nature is characterized by individual freedom but lacks social order or authority. This concept was developed by prominent philosophers like Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau.

The philosopher who argued that social inequality arises from the human desire for power, possessions, and perfection. He proposed that returning to a natural state of equality is necessary to overcome social injustice.

An action that is just when it distributes benefits and burdens fairly, respecting the inherent worth of each individual. This concept evolved from the idea of natural right and reflects moral equality.

The concept that all individuals are equal before God, regardless of their social status, which has had a significant influence on moral and philosophical thought.

A principle that asserts that any unequal distribution of goods or resources must be justified by reasons that apply equally to all.

The core principle of human rights, established by Enlightenment thinkers like Kant, emphasizing equal freedom and autonomy for all rational beings.

A fundamental concept that underpins modern political theories, establishing a baseline of equal respect for every individual.

The core principle of equal treatment for all, forming the foundation of modern human rights declarations and constitutional principles.

Factors that are generally considered justifiable for unequal treatment in the economic sphere, such as need, rights, performance, efficiency, and compensation for discrimination.

The philosophical debate focusing on the kind of equal treatment that is morally required when all individuals are acknowledged as persons with equal dignity.

A procedural principle for constructing theories, focusing on equal distribution of goods and requiring justification for any unequal distribution.

A theory that believes equality is inherently good, regardless of practical benefits. It argues that inequality itself is bad, even if it doesn't harm anyone.

Justice between generations. It questions if the current generation has an obligation to provide equal living conditions for future generations.

Principles that focus on creating equal starting points for everyone, but don't guarantee continuous equality.

A type of equality principle that aims to achieve equal income at every point in time, even if it leads to wealth disparities.

The time frame in which a society is supposed to achieve and maintain the desired level of equality.

The idea that equality should be achieved, maintained, or at least pursued as a goal.

The notion that equality should be achieved despite morally arbitrary factors like birth or social status.

The idea that everyone should start with the same goods or resources, allowing them to use them freely afterwards, even if it leads to unequal outcomes.

The idea that striving for perfect equality can lead to a situation where everyone is equally bad off, without benefiting anyone. This objection arises when achieving equality requires taking away from those who are better off, without improving the situation for those who are worse off.

This view emphasizes the importance of promoting equality for its positive consequences, such as reducing poverty, increasing economic growth, or stabilizing society. It focuses on the practical benefits rather than the inherent fairness of equality.

A version of egalitarianism that accepts equality as a significant value, but also recognizes other values, such as individual wellbeing. It acknowledges that promoting equality can sometimes conflict with other values, and seeks to find solutions that balance both goals.

A type of egalitarianism that aims to achieve complete equality, even if it requires bringing everyone down to the same level. It focuses on maximizing equality without considering other potential benefits or drawbacks.

An approach to equality that emphasizes the importance of promoting the wellbeing of individuals, even if it sometimes requires accepting some degree of inequality. It prioritizes maximizing overall happiness and welfare.

The idea that achieving equality might sometimes require taking away from those who are better off to redistribute resources to those who are worse off. This raises questions about fairness and the ethics of such redistribution.

A form of equality that focuses on ensuring individuals have equal opportunities and access to resources, rather than attempting to achieve identical outcomes.