Podcast
Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Questions and Answers
What did Ukraine argue when it invoked ICJ’s jurisdiction under the dispute resolution clause of the Genocide Convention?
What did Ukraine argue when it invoked ICJ’s jurisdiction under the dispute resolution clause of the Genocide Convention?
- That ICJ had no jurisdiction over the dispute
- That Russia invoked the Genocide Convention as a legal basis for its military operation
- That Russia falsely accused Kyiv of committing genocide in Luhansk and Donetsk regions (correct)
- That Russia's military operation was justified
What was Russia's response when the ICJ called for hearing the dispute?
What was Russia's response when the ICJ called for hearing the dispute?
- Russia immediately agreed to the ICJ's jurisdiction
- Russia accused ICJ of bias
- Russia chose not to participate in the proceedings (correct)
- Russia requested for an urgent resolution
What was the basis of Ukraine's prayer to the court?
What was the basis of Ukraine's prayer to the court?
- Request for a formal apology from Russia
- Declare that the Russian military operation was based on a false accusation of genocide (correct)
- Urge for immediate withdrawal of Russian forces
- Seek compensation for damages caused by the military operation
What did Russia assert regarding the subject matter of the case?
What did Russia assert regarding the subject matter of the case?
Signup and view all the answers
Why did Ukraine invoke ICJ’s jurisdiction under the dispute resolution clause of the Genocide Convention?
Why did Ukraine invoke ICJ’s jurisdiction under the dispute resolution clause of the Genocide Convention?
Signup and view all the answers
Flashcards are hidden until you start studying
