Podcast Beta
Questions and Answers
What is a key aspect of science that involves distinguishing between theories and evidence?
In the context of pseudoscience, what is a common characteristic regarding probabilities and mathematics?
What is a common logical fallacy observed in arguments where the authority of an individual is used as evidence?
Which factor contributes to the replication crisis in scientific research?
Signup and view all the answers
What differentiates science from pseudoscience in terms of how evidence is treated?
Signup and view all the answers
What distinguishes pseudoscience from science in terms of evidence collection?
Signup and view all the answers
What is a key characteristic of the replication crisis in scientific research?
Signup and view all the answers
Which factor contributes to making evidence-based conclusions in science probabilistic in nature?
Signup and view all the answers
What is a common aspect of pseudoscience regarding qualifications and grant procedures?
Signup and view all the answers
In distinguishing between science and pseudoscience, what role does transparency play in evidence collection?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Integrated Professional, Ethical, and Personal Identity
- Understanding the interaction between personal and professional selves in an ethical context
- Using best-known practices ensures harm minimization, defensible treatments, and systematic accumulation of knowledge
Science and Evidence
- Science involves an attitude of humility, wonder, and commitment to understanding the truth
- Involves understanding methods used to generate evidence and distinguishing between theories and evidence
- Recognizes that understandings are distinct from individuals who propose or support them
- Accepts that evidence-based conclusions are probabilistic and open to criticism
- Requires transparency in evidence gathering and open communication for worldwide transmission of findings and criticism
Pseudoscience
- Characterized by arrogance, accepting anecdotal and poorly controlled evidence, and inability to distinguish between theories and evidence
- Often involves an "important" individual associated with the theory, and evidence collected behind closed doors
- May involve one-way transmission of information with no opportunity for questioning or criticism
- May have little value or formalized qualifications, and status or promotions guaranteed by supporting current beliefs
Logical Fallacies
- Argument from/ Appeal to Authority: believing something is true because an important person said it or endorses it
- Ad Hominem: attacking someone personally instead of their claim or evidence
- Argument from/Appeal to Antiquity: believing something is true because it has been known for a long time
Replication Crisis
- Process of repeating research to determine the extent to which findings generalize across time and situations
- Factors contributing to the crisis include pressure to publish, desire for new studies, and lack of transparency in evidence gathering
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Explore the concept of an integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity and understand the importance of ethical considerations in one's personal and professional life. Learn how to minimize harm, avoid untested techniques, and choose the most effective treatments in practice.