Podcast
Questions and Answers
According to legal principles governing insurance contracts, which scenario would render an insurance agreement void?
According to legal principles governing insurance contracts, which scenario would render an insurance agreement void?
- The insured house was already destroyed by fire before the insurance contract was finalized. (correct)
- The insured experiences a minor change in their risk profile during the contract period.
- The insured party failed to regularly update their contact information with the insurer.
- The insured party experienced a job loss, impacting their ability to pay premiums on time leading to policy lapse.
An insurance policy that covers losses arising from trafficking in narcotics is enforceable, provided all premiums have been paid.
An insurance policy that covers losses arising from trafficking in narcotics is enforceable, provided all premiums have been paid.
False (B)
Under what specific circumstance related to a beneficiary's actions does an insurer remain obligated to fulfill an insurance payout, even when a deliberate act caused the insured risk to occur?
Under what specific circumstance related to a beneficiary's actions does an insurer remain obligated to fulfill an insurance payout, even when a deliberate act caused the insured risk to occur?
When the beneficiary is a third party unrelated to the wrongful conduct of the policyholder or insured.
As per Article 207, for an insurance contract to be valid, the cause must be existing, valid, lawful and not inconsistent with ______ policy or morals.
As per Article 207, for an insurance contract to be valid, the cause must be existing, valid, lawful and not inconsistent with ______ policy or morals.
Match the scenarios to the likely outcome regarding the insurance payout:
Match the scenarios to the likely outcome regarding the insurance payout:
What is the critical distinction between 'uncertainty regarding the timing of the risk' and 'uncertainty regarding the occurrence of the risk' in insurance contracts?
What is the critical distinction between 'uncertainty regarding the timing of the risk' and 'uncertainty regarding the occurrence of the risk' in insurance contracts?
If an insured party unintentionally provides inaccurate information that lessens the importance of the insured risk, but does so without fraud or ill faith, the insurer is still entitled to demand full payment of all premiums without assuming any risk.
If an insured party unintentionally provides inaccurate information that lessens the importance of the insured risk, but does so without fraud or ill faith, the insurer is still entitled to demand full payment of all premiums without assuming any risk.
When the insurance contract is rescinded due to the insured providing false information, what is the deciding factory that determines whether the insurer must refund the premiums paid?
When the insurance contract is rescinded due to the insured providing false information, what is the deciding factory that determines whether the insurer must refund the premiums paid?
According to the principles governing insurance contracts, the insured is obligated to disclose all information that the insurer considers important to assess the risks covered by the insurance policy at the time of ______ of the contract.
According to the principles governing insurance contracts, the insured is obligated to disclose all information that the insurer considers important to assess the risks covered by the insurance policy at the time of ______ of the contract.
Match the element of an insurance contract with its corresponding description:
Match the element of an insurance contract with its corresponding description:
Which of the elements below is NOT required for a valid insurable risk?
Which of the elements below is NOT required for a valid insurable risk?
An insurance company can insure businesses involved in immoral activities, as long as the activities are legal.
An insurance company can insure businesses involved in immoral activities, as long as the activities are legal.
Give an example of a situation covered in the content where an insured individual can still claim insurance proceeds despite committing an intentional act.
Give an example of a situation covered in the content where an insured individual can still claim insurance proceeds despite committing an intentional act.
According to Article 1034, the insurer is bound to pay the insured amount or the sum due to the insured or the beneficiary upon ______ of the risk or maturity of the period fixed in the contract.
According to Article 1034, the insurer is bound to pay the insured amount or the sum due to the insured or the beneficiary upon ______ of the risk or maturity of the period fixed in the contract.
Match the types of risk with whether payment would occur:
Match the types of risk with whether payment would occur:
Which of the following scenarios would nullify an isurance contract?
Which of the following scenarios would nullify an isurance contract?
If an insurance policy contains a clause that forfeits the insured's right to coverage merely for violating laws or regulations, the contract itself becomes invalid.
If an insurance policy contains a clause that forfeits the insured's right to coverage merely for violating laws or regulations, the contract itself becomes invalid.
Give 2 examples of when the insured may still claim the insurance despite committing an intentional act
Give 2 examples of when the insured may still claim the insurance despite committing an intentional act
According to Article 1033, concealing a matter or making a false statement in bad faith in such a manner as to lessen the importance of the risk insured against, or fraudulently breaching a promise to fulfill an obligation entitles the insurer to demand ______ of the contract.
According to Article 1033, concealing a matter or making a false statement in bad faith in such a manner as to lessen the importance of the risk insured against, or fraudulently breaching a promise to fulfill an obligation entitles the insurer to demand ______ of the contract.
Match the elements of insurance to what they are:
Match the elements of insurance to what they are:
Flashcards
What is Consent?
What is Consent?
A mutual agreement, willingly made, forming the basis of an insurance contract.
What is Insured Risk?
What is Insured Risk?
The potential event leading to a claim, which must be lawful, contingent, and uncertain.
What is Cause?
What is Cause?
The direct and intended purpose of the insurance contract, aligned with law and morals.
Lawful Insured Risk
Lawful Insured Risk
Signup and view all the flashcards
Contingent Insured Risk
Contingent Insured Risk
Signup and view all the flashcards
Uninsurable Risks
Uninsurable Risks
Signup and view all the flashcards
Uncertainty Regarding Risk
Uncertainty Regarding Risk
Signup and view all the flashcards
Uncertainty Regarding Timing
Uncertainty Regarding Timing
Signup and view all the flashcards
Contingency of Insured Risk
Contingency of Insured Risk
Signup and view all the flashcards
Risk Already Materialized
Risk Already Materialized
Signup and view all the flashcards
Insurance Against Deliberate Acts
Insurance Against Deliberate Acts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Exceptions for Third-Party Beneficiary
Exceptions for Third-Party Beneficiary
Signup and view all the flashcards
Acts Committed in Good Faith
Acts Committed in Good Faith
Signup and view all the flashcards
Valid Cause in Contract
Valid Cause in Contract
Signup and view all the flashcards
Obligation of Insured(Payment)
Obligation of Insured(Payment)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Obligation of Insured(Disclosure)
Obligation of Insured(Disclosure)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Bad Faith Consequences
Bad Faith Consequences
Signup and view all the flashcards
Insurer's obligation
Insurer's obligation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- The elements of an insurance contract are: consent, insured risk, and cause
Insured Risk
- The risk must be lawful and not contravene public policy or morals
- The risk must be lawful, meaning it cannot conflict with public policy or moral standards
- The insured risk is the subject matter of the insurance contract and the object must be lawful, otherwise the contract is void
- It is impermissible to insure against the risk of being ordered to pay a financial penalty imposed on an individual
- Insurance covering a criminal judgment involving confiscation is not allowed
- Insurance against risks arising from illicit activities, such as trafficking in narcotics or human organs, is forbidden
- It is impermissible to insure properties or businesses involved in immoral or illegal activities, such as prostitution, or illegal gaming establishments, against actions taken by public authorities
- The risk must be contingent (uncertain) in its occurrence
- The element of uncertainty is fundamental to aleatory contracts, including insurance contracts
- Uncertainty of the insured risk can manifest in one of two ways, uncertainty regarding the occurrence of the risk and uncertainty regarding the timing of the risk
- The occurrence of the risk itself is uncertain, meaning it may or may not happen, examples include insurance against fire, theft, liability, or accidents
- The risk is not uncertain in its occurrence and is certain, but its timing is unknown, example falls under life insurance in which the timing of death is unknown
- The insured risk must be contingent, meaning it is uncertain yet possible, and not impossible because the subject matter of the insurance contract must be feasible.
- If the insured risk is impossible, the contract is rendered void due to the impossibility of its subject matter, Article 201 CTL says "Should the object be impossible in itself shall be impossible in itself, at the time of the contract, the contract shall be void."
- The contingency of the insured risk requires that the risk must not have already occurred or cased to exist prior to the conclusion of the insurance contract.
- If a person insures a house against fire and the house has already burned down before the insurance is concluded, the risk faced by the insured has already materialized and is no longer uncertain.
- If goods have already been safely delivered, the risk of transit damage is impossible, and the contract is be void, regardless of whether the insurer was aware of the situation. Insurance Against Deliberate Acts
- A deliberate act leads to the nullity of the insurance contract and in cases where it results in the forfeiture of the insured's right to claim the insurance payout when the insured risk materializes
- An individual cannot seek insurance coverage for deliberate wrongful acts such acts such as those that constitute crimes under criminal law, those policies are void
- Deliberate Acts for violations of laws and regulations, an insurance contract will be valid unless these violations involve deliberate criminal acts
- If the insurance policy contains a clause that forfeits the insured's right to coverage merely for violating laws or regulations, the contract itself remains valid, but such a clause is nullified by operation of law.
- A deliberate act can lead to the forfeiture of the insured's right to claim insurance proceeds if an individual insures against a permissible risk but then intentionally causes the insured risk to materialize. An example include insuring a home against fire and then intentionally setting the house ablaze, also, insuring one's life or the life of another person, then committing suicide or murdering the insured individual
- In such cases, the insured loses the right to the insurance payout, and the insurer is discharged from their obligation and this does not nullify the insurance contract itself.
- The deliberate act is committed by the policyholder or the insured but the beneficiary is a third party (unrelated to the wrongful act), such act does not affect the beneficiary's right to claim the insurance proceeds and the insurer remains liable and must fulfill the obligation by paying the agreed amount to the third-party beneficiary.
- The insured may still claim the insurance proceeds despite committing an intentional act if the act was performed out of duty or for the public Interest, for example the insured risks their life (covered under the policy) to save another person from imminent danger such as drowning or a fire.
Cause
- The cause must be the direct intended purpose of the contract.
- The cause, as directed in Article 207, must be existing, valid, lawful, and not inconsistent with public policy or morals
Legal Effects
- As directed in Article 1032, the insured is bound to pay the agreed amounts on the term fixed in the contract.
- The insured has an obligation to reveal at the time of the contract, all information so the insurer can assess the risks covered
- The insured has an obligation to Inform the insurer of all matters occurring during the contract period which lead to the aggravation of risks
Obligation of the Insured
- Insured, in bad faith, conceals a matter or makes a false statement in such a manner as to lessen the importance of the risk insured against, or leads to a change in its object, or breaches a promise to fulfill an obligation, the insurer is entitled to demand rescission of the contract and be paid all premiums due
- Absence of fraud or ill faith, the insurer, upon demanding rescission, has to refund all premiums paid or the portion thereof for which he assumed no risk at all
Obligations of the Insurer
- As stated in Article 1034, the the insurer is bound to pay the insured amount or the sum due to the insured or the beneficiary as agreed, upon occurrence of the risk or maturity of the period fixed in the contract.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.