Inhaled Reliever Therapy for Asthma Study
5 Questions
1 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which therapy was found to be associated with the fewest severe exacerbations compared to SABA alone?

  • SABA combined with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)
  • SABA alone
  • Long-acting β agonist without ICS
  • Inhaled corticosteroids with formoterol (correct)
  • What improvement in asthma control was associated with ICS-formoterol compared to SABA alone?

  • 0.84 RR improvement
  • 1.07 RR improvement (correct)
  • 0.65 RR improvement
  • 0.78 RR improvement
  • What is the minimum important difference (MID) for the Asthma Control Questionnaire in terms of score change?

  • 0.3 points
  • 0.5 points (correct)
  • 1.0 points
  • 2.0 points
  • Among the therapies compared, which one showed a risk ratio of 0.84 for severe exacerbations when compared with SABA alone?

    <p>ICS-SABA</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the overall sample size for the randomized clinical trials included in the analysis?

    <p>50,496 patients</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Inhaled Reliever Therapy for Asthma

    • Study compared different inhaled reliever therapies for asthma
    • Focused on short-acting β agonists (SABA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with formoterol, and ICS combined with SABA
    • Analyzed data from 27 randomized clinical trials with a total of 50,496 adult and pediatric patients (mean age 41.0 years, 40% male)

    Findings

    • Reduced Exacerbations:
      • ICS-formoterol significantly reduced severe exacerbations (risk ratio [RR] 0.65, 95% CI 0.60-0.72) compared to SABA alone
      • ICS-SABA also showed a reduction in severe exacerbations (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.95) relative to SABA alone
    • Improved Asthma Control:
      • ICS-formoterol and ICS-SABA both led to improved asthma control compared to SABA alone. (Significant improvement in MID scores and respective risk differences)
    • Indirect Comparison (ICS-Formoterol vs. ICS-SABA):
      • ICS-formoterol exhibited a greater reduction in severe exacerbations (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.92) than ICS-SABA
    • Safety:
      • Neither ICS-formoterol nor ICS-SABA showed an increased risk of serious adverse events compared to SABA alone (high/moderate certainty)
    • Certainty of Evidence:
      • Evidence for reduced exacerbations and improved control is high certainty for both ICS combinations.
      • Evidence for ICS-formoterol vs. ICS-SABA and their safety effects is moderate to high certainty.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the findings of a comprehensive study comparing various inhaled reliever therapies for asthma, focusing on short-acting β agonists and combinations with inhaled corticosteroids. Analyze data from 27 trials to understand the impact of these therapies on exacerbations and asthma control in adult and pediatric patients.

    More Like This

    Inhaled Anesthetics
    51 questions

    Inhaled Anesthetics

    WorkableCreativity2568 avatar
    WorkableCreativity2568
    Inhaled Anesthetics in Clinical Use
    41 questions
    Pharmacology of Inhaled Beta2-Agonists
    40 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser