Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is a possible implication of a lack of information on a subject?
What is a possible implication of a lack of information on a subject?
- It prevents understanding and comprehension. (correct)
- It enhances communication skills.
- It encourages critical thinking.
- It leads to well-informed decisions.
How might insufficient data affect decision-making processes?
How might insufficient data affect decision-making processes?
- It can result in hasty and possibly incorrect conclusions. (correct)
- It promotes faster decision making.
- It guarantees successful outcomes.
- It allows for flexibility in choices.
Which of the following best describes the relationship between information and knowledge?
Which of the following best describes the relationship between information and knowledge?
- Knowledge is built upon the foundation of information. (correct)
- Information and knowledge are the same.
- Information is less significant than knowledge.
- Knowledge is completely independent from information.
What effect does misinformation have in a discussion?
What effect does misinformation have in a discussion?
Which of the following is NOT a consequence of having an abundance of unchecked information?
Which of the following is NOT a consequence of having an abundance of unchecked information?
Flashcards are hidden until you start studying
Study Notes
Negotiating in Management and Business
- Distributive negotiations involve opposing preferences, where one party's gain is the other's loss.
- The goal is maximizing individual gain ("slicing the pie").
- Integrative negotiations involve common interests, aiming for maximizing both individual and joint gain ("increasing the pie").
Distributive Negotiation Strategies
- Improve your BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement):
- Generate new alternatives.
- Improve the value of existing alternatives.
- Increase certainty for probabilistic alternatives.
- Ambitious first offers:
- Sets the tone (frames the discussion).
- Anchors the opponent (influences their expectations).
- Explains a large portion of outcome variance.
- Precise offers:
- Precision increases anchor potency.
- Negotiators with precise offers generally perform better.
- Use qualitative anchors:
- Qualities (e.g., product defects) can anchor perceptions.
- Highlight positive or negative qualities to influence outcomes.
- Decreasing concessions:
- Gradual concessions communicate seriousness for reaching bottom line.
- Some dealmakers use a 25-10-5 model.
Negotiating from a position of low power
- Make the other party smaller:
- Diversify business across multiple counterparts.
- Diversify across different parties within your counterpart.
- Make yourself bigger:
- Build coalitions with other entities.
- Use deals in sequence to build momentum, credibility, etc.
Example: When not to move first (1/2)
- In 1963, United Artists offered The Beatles' manager Brian Epstein $25,000 upfront and then asked for his view about a suitable percentage of profits for a low-budget movie.
- Epstein asserted they needed 7.5% of profits.
- The movie became a success. United Artists had been willing to offer up to 25%.
Example: When not to move first (2/2)
- Let the other party move first:
- If the negotiator lacks knowledge on the matter.
- Build expertise and do homework:
- Research past movie deals with other bands
- Play hard to get:
- E.g., playing a reluctant buyer
Integrative Negotiations
- Delay first offers:
- Allows for the discovery of creative agreements.
- Reduces focus on fixed positions.
- Take the other party's perspective:
- Empathy and perspective-taking can lead to better results.
- Build trust:
- Being likable (emphasizing commonalities).
- Being vulnerable (sharing information).
- Ask questions:
- Reveals priorities.
- Strengthens liking.
Complex Negotiations
- Logrolling: Trade-off issues with different values to each party.
- Post-settlement settlement: Exploring additional deals after a deal is agreed to.
- MESOs (Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers): Multiple offers of similar value to anchor the opponent, signal flexibility and reveal preferences.
- Scoorring systems: Quantifying possible outcomes by assigning weights to satisfaction/utility.
Negotiation in Teams
- Identify issues, define your BATNA, worst- and best-case scenarios.
- Decide on team procedures for meetings.
- Clarify facts and information.
- Develop a "Positions and Interests" chart; set priorities.
- Define team roles: Lead negotiator, Number cruncher, Note taker, Good cop/bad cop.
- Use rectangular or circular setups for team meetings dependent on goals.
- Rectangular tables are better for competitive situations while circular tables are better for cooperative situations.
Negotiating in a Global Context
- Culture is like an iceberg (much is unseen).
- Relevant dimensions to consider include: self-interest, communication styles, hierarchies, disagreement approaches, and scheduling.
- Create your own culture map for yourself and your counterpart.
- Be aware of cultural stereotypes.
- Use diverse communication channels for international negotiation
Communicating virtually
- Communication channels matter (synchronicity / social bandwidth).
- Use appropriate channels for the negotiation, participants' needs, etc.
- Be conscious of potential miscommunication with virtual negotiation channels.
Dispute Resolution
- A dispute arises when a claim is made and rejected, not just an exchange of resources.
- Characteristics: high emotions, possibly no bad intentions, and linked BATNAs
- Model of dispute resolution considers interests, rights, and power as interdependent factors.
- Effective dispute resolution focuses on interests first, using rights and power as backup.
- To address disputes, use an approach that balances power, rights, and interests.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.